Just curious how you all would feel about this situation I've run into in previous years (note - I don't mean this year per se as I haven't raced much this year.)
I did 3 local triathlons last year, and they were well attended. I think 2 of them sold out before race day, if not all 3. Well run events, pretty competitive, with lots of very experienced folks showing up but also a wide range of ability.
At all 3 events, the AG podiums for every category from M<25 to M<45 were heavily overrepresented, if not outright swept by a particular 'team'. I normally have no problem with this, but in this case, this team was all sponsored by one commericial product, which was clearly and obviously emblazoned on their matching team kit. And everyone on the team was fast - it wasn't like a more inclusive commerical team where there are both elites but also MOP AGers - this team was clearly aimed to recruit podium-worthy triathletes (I found their website, which seems to clearly suggest that. I'm not going to mention them as I do NOT intend to and do not think this is a place for a company witch hunt, so please don't use this thread to try and hunt them down in public.)
I'm not one to raise a big schtick over the podium as I'm nowhere near contention for the overall at these races and can barely creep onto the AG podium myself, but there was something unsettling to me about seeing almost all the AG spots at every single race I did, nearly swept by the same commercially-sponsored venture, even if the guys on the team aren't being paid to race.
I guess it just felt to me kind of unsportmanlike to recruit the fastest racers from the region, give them perks to show up to represent your product at the race, and then crush the AGers as opposing to racing elite/pro, as I'd be most of those team racers wouldn't even be there if they weren't sponsored to do so.
Anyway, just wondering out loud about it.
I did 3 local triathlons last year, and they were well attended. I think 2 of them sold out before race day, if not all 3. Well run events, pretty competitive, with lots of very experienced folks showing up but also a wide range of ability.
At all 3 events, the AG podiums for every category from M<25 to M<45 were heavily overrepresented, if not outright swept by a particular 'team'. I normally have no problem with this, but in this case, this team was all sponsored by one commericial product, which was clearly and obviously emblazoned on their matching team kit. And everyone on the team was fast - it wasn't like a more inclusive commerical team where there are both elites but also MOP AGers - this team was clearly aimed to recruit podium-worthy triathletes (I found their website, which seems to clearly suggest that. I'm not going to mention them as I do NOT intend to and do not think this is a place for a company witch hunt, so please don't use this thread to try and hunt them down in public.)
I'm not one to raise a big schtick over the podium as I'm nowhere near contention for the overall at these races and can barely creep onto the AG podium myself, but there was something unsettling to me about seeing almost all the AG spots at every single race I did, nearly swept by the same commercially-sponsored venture, even if the guys on the team aren't being paid to race.
I guess it just felt to me kind of unsportmanlike to recruit the fastest racers from the region, give them perks to show up to represent your product at the race, and then crush the AGers as opposing to racing elite/pro, as I'd be most of those team racers wouldn't even be there if they weren't sponsored to do so.
Anyway, just wondering out loud about it.