Let me check on that.
Although the rim shape does taper back in somewhat at the spokebed, I would definitely not classify it as narrow or pointy there - it's just not a blunt radius. In our shape optimization studies, we found that the balance of depth at 64mm and max width at ~30mm allowed us to better fine tune the trade off between wake recovery when the spoke bed is the trailing edge (wheel front half) and acceptable curvature for when the spoke bed is the leading edge (wheel back half).
One common misconception, I think, is that for some reason the spoke bed needs to be especially blunt or even match the tire radius. An optimized leading edge shape isn't necessarily a large blunt radius. And that's especially the case when that same shape is being co-optimized to be both a leading and trailing edge.
Chris Yu
Applied Technology
Specialized Bicycle Components
@chrisyuinc
Although the rim shape does taper back in somewhat at the spokebed, I would definitely not classify it as narrow or pointy there - it's just not a blunt radius. In our shape optimization studies, we found that the balance of depth at 64mm and max width at ~30mm allowed us to better fine tune the trade off between wake recovery when the spoke bed is the trailing edge (wheel front half) and acceptable curvature for when the spoke bed is the leading edge (wheel back half).
One common misconception, I think, is that for some reason the spoke bed needs to be especially blunt or even match the tire radius. An optimized leading edge shape isn't necessarily a large blunt radius. And that's especially the case when that same shape is being co-optimized to be both a leading and trailing edge.
Chris Yu
Applied Technology
Specialized Bicycle Components
@chrisyuinc