N.Cornyn wrote:
The E118 Tri+ seems to be a pretty similar bike to the Orbea Ordu (lower weight relative to average tri bikes, aggressive base bar, responsive etc.).
Not to completely derail this thread but assuming both bikes fit well, which would you consider purchasing? Racing mainly 70.3s with the odd IM (targeting hillier courses). Average 2:10-2:15 for 70.3s if that makes the decision change.
TLDR: I am
very happy with my Argon18 E-118.
The Orbea wasn't on my radar. I saw it featured on GCN but there wasn't a LBS near me that carried the brand. My short list really came down to the E-119 Disc, the E-118Tri+ and the Trek Speed Concept (specifically the UCI version as it was in stock last December). The Shiv TT was not in stock, I had too many questions regarding the SpeedMax geometry. I found a couple of shops in the US that had the Cervelo P5 available in my size but price + shipping/exchange/duties to Canada scratched that off my list.
What put me off about the Trek was the complexity in sourcing the multitude of options for the basebar(s), tower(s), etc. If my local Trek dealer was scratching his head... With an Argon18, you get all the parts in the box; if I want to play with different pad heights later, I'm not going open my wallet to do so.
I've had mine for a 70.3, travelled with it to Europe for Challenge Roth and rode it up Alpe d'Huez. A full season with many happy miles.
Want to know the most subtle thing that I love about the E-118? Water bottle bosses on the down tube AND seat tube. For how I like to do, that means calories, lots of calories, in bottles that are always easy to reach, never going to eject out the back, no sticky hands fumbling with gel packets or dealing with litter. Ah... the simple things :)