Sub17Project wrote:
I think his retirement coupled with less participants and less races does signal major restructuring on Ironman's part.
When revenue is cut in half you can't pay for expenses to include the over inflated salary of the CEO. I think it echoes the financial woes Ironman is going through due to numbers plummeting.
With time I think we will forget many of the ups and downs of IM during Messick's tenure. He does some good things. But I think the one thing we will remember is the killing or severe injury to the mystique of Kona.
We can pretend it was for fairness to women, bla, bla, bla. But it was a need to put 5000 people on a course to "grow", not the sport, but earnings. Long term they would have been better with 2400 people in a one day event and found alternatives for many of the other issues.
Had we been in a boom, maybe they would have been able to transfer some of that mystique elsewhere and Nice was certainly a candidate. But the timing was not good. The powers (PTO, Challenge, IM) should have cooperated for their own good.
Bad conditions, good pilot, one can recover. Bad conditions, bad pilot, goes into a tailspin.
I do not blame Andrew, he is is accountable to his shareholders not to any legacy
Only time will tell.