ThailandUltras wrote:
Fishbum wrote:
The way I look at it and why I say they're not compatible is just the type of person that each race attracts. In my opinion I think you would be hard-pressed to find anyone who's done both iron Man and ultra trails to say that the crowd in ultra trail running would want all the commercialization that will be brought with something like iron Man at the helm.
.
.
.
I don't know who you hang out with but I know so many people who have done both Ultra-trails/North Face,Western States,Leadville.Badwater and Ironman's and Ultraman's that it wouldn't be worth trying to list them.They are usually a very different personality for sure but they are around in numbers.
.
Ironman bought Ultra-Trail Australia three years ago (and own two other Ultra-Trail events)
Ultra-Trail Australia acquired by IRONMAN - endurance.biz .
It will be interesting to see what Ironman's game plan is with buying up ultras.
UTMB is a very different race to UTA 100km in Australia.
UTAust has some similarities with IM. No qualification standards, relatively high entry fee, extremely generous cut-off time. While a reasonably tough 100km worth of trails, it is an accessible entry point for anyone interested in getting into trail ultras. With the addition of the 50km, 25km and now 12km events over the race weekend, it even has its equivalents of a 70.3, 5150 and Ironkids events!
UTMB is different. It's not an event for everyone in the same way IM is marketed. And it requires qualification at other races. And this is where I wonder where Ironman is headed.
With qualification for UTMB currently earned through points from completing any number of independent ultras around the world, will IM give preference to UTMB qualification at the relatively few ultras they already own, or will they seek to franchise the sport to same extent as they have with Kona and long distance triathlon?
While the UTMB qualification system isn't broken, I don't trust Ironman not to try and "fix" it.