Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Prev Next
Ironman and UTMB Partnership
Quote | Reply
Interesting podcast that was just released this morning announcing the partnership of UTMB and Ironman. Seems like more of an acquisition of UTMB by Ironman than a partnership, but guess we will see.

https://trailrunnernation.com/2021/05/the-ultra-trail-du-mont-blanc-and-ironman-announce-a-new-partnership-what-will-it-mean-for-trail-running/
Quote Reply
Re: Ironman and UTMB Partnership [ultrasu] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
So gross 🤢

I say that as a multiple time Ironman finisher and still avid triathlete, but also avid trail runner. The segment of triathlon that MDot represents is NOT compatible with trail running. And to take the crowning event of MUT running and roll it into “the brand” is horrifying.
Quote Reply
Re: Ironman and UTMB Partnership [ultrasu] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Story in Trail Runner today.

As someone who is moving toward trail ultras partly because they are not like IM, I wasn't real happy at first glance to see this announcement this morning, but I was a enthusiastic IM customer for a decade starting in the mid '90s and still love to watch the Kona race each year. My A race for this year and the first trail ultra I did is MaXi-Race France that in 2019 attracted 10K participants for a weekend of trail races of various distances and had other events around the globe, so it wasn't a hard-core, local event that first attracted me to doing a trail ultra.

OTOH, I did my first trail marathon in Georgia a couple of weeks ago that had 40 finishers and it was very different than a large triathlon in multiple ways that I enjoyed.

I'll likely stay a MaXi-Race participant down the road when I want a big race and hope that any increased interest the IM brand brings to trail ultras helps the MaXi-Race brand be successful and motivates them to differentiate their brand from IM.
Last edited by: Mark Lemmon: May 7, 21 8:34
Quote Reply
Re: Ironman and UTMB Partnership [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Man, when I saw UTMB, I thought it was University of Texas Medical Branch.
Quote Reply
Re: Ironman and UTMB Partnership [s13tx] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
s13tx wrote:
Man, when I saw UTMB, I thought it was University of Texas Medical Branch.

I mean that's probably no a bad acquisition either for them. They could do a sports med center and a cardiac arrest to IM program in 2 years.

Brian Stover USAT LII
Accelerate3 Coaching
Insta

Quote Reply
Re: Ironman and UTMB Partnership [cloesch] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
cloesch wrote:
So gross 🤢

I say that as a multiple time Ironman finisher and still avid triathlete, but also avid trail runner. The segment of triathlon that MDot represents is NOT compatible with trail running. And to take the crowning event of MUT running and roll it into “the brand” is horrifying.


I agree this mortifies me. I started in trail running before trying my hand at triathlon and after Lake Placid whenever it eventually goes off I'm done with iron Man. You cannot compare the two scenes to each other and iron Man's move into trail running would completely ruin it...... They are polar opposites and have no business being in bed together....
SAD
Quote Reply
Re: Ironman and UTMB Partnership [ultrasu] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Ugh. Disgusting.
Quote Reply
Re: Ironman and UTMB Partnership [Fishbum] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Just to add to this where does it stop? God forbid these idiots start buying up things like Western States 100 or run rabbit run or any races along those lines... These idiots are like government they can find a way to ruin the best things!!!!!!


I didn't feel like getting into it earlier but in another thread Dan made the statement he doesn't know of anyone or very few who have been disappointed by iron Man events I find that interesting I would say it's a 50/50 split of most people I talk to.
Quote Reply
Re: Ironman and UTMB Partnership [Fishbum] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I'd be interested to hear Dan's perspective on this news.

I believe that the goal of UTMB and Ironman is to build a business model in trail similar to what they have built in triathlon. Has Ironman become successful with this through a process of uniformity and replication? Is it necessary for them, in order to put on so many events, to some extent, create an assembly line model of race directing? Does that remove some of the soul of the original race?
Quote Reply
Re: Ironman and UTMB Partnership [ultrasu] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
The way I look at it and why I say they're not compatible is just the type of person that each race attracts. In my opinion I think you would be hard-pressed to find anyone who's done both iron Man and ultra trails to say that the crowd in ultra trail running would want all the commercialization that will be brought with something like iron Man at the helm. Just a vastly different scene. I've been at Ultras where you see dudes pounding beers before the race but then you'll see those same guys at the end of the race changing socks grabbing gels and heading back out in the other direction to help their friends finish.
Quote Reply
Re: Ironman and UTMB Partnership [Fishbum] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Fishbum wrote:
The way I look at it and why I say they're not compatible is just the type of person that each race attracts. In my opinion I think you would be hard-pressed to find anyone who's done both iron Man and ultra trails to say that the crowd in ultra trail running would want all the commercialization that will be brought with something like iron Man at the helm.
.

.
.
I don't know who you hang out with but I know so many people who have done both Ultra-trails/North Face,Western States,Leadville.Badwater and Ironman's and Ultraman's that it wouldn't be worth trying to list them.They are usually a very different personality for sure but they are around in numbers.
.
Ironman bought Ultra-Trail Australia three years ago (and own two other Ultra-Trail events)
Ultra-Trail Australia acquired by IRONMAN - endurance.biz
.
Last edited by: ThailandUltras: May 6, 21 12:04
Quote Reply
Re: Ironman and UTMB Partnership [ThailandUltras] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
ThailandUltras wrote:
Fishbum wrote:
The way I look at it and why I say they're not compatible is just the type of person that each race attracts. In my opinion I think you would be hard-pressed to find anyone who's done both iron Man and ultra trails to say that the crowd in ultra trail running would want all the commercialization that will be brought with something like iron Man at the helm.
.

.
.
I don't know who you hang out with but I know so many people who have done both Ultra-trails/North Face,Western States,Leadville.Badwater and Ironman's and Ultraman's that it wouldn't be worth trying to list them.They are usually a very different personality for sure but they are around in numbers.



I'm not quite sure what you're getting at with the last sentence that they are around in numbers?


And I'm quite certain we are all hanging out with very different people. At least here in central Pennsylvania we are
.
Last edited by: Fishbum: May 6, 21 12:13
Quote Reply
Re: Ironman and UTMB Partnership [Fishbum] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
20 year IM athlete here. sold my tri back this year. got my IMC refund after spending COVID seeking new adventures. Have not swam since summer in the lake. I am not going back. Too much of adventure to find out there.

Lots of time last year adventuring in trails and did a small 3 peaks race in Kelowna and a solo 50K. I just absolutely love it. I see this 'merger' as a real long term ultratrail problem if we follow what's happen the past 10 years in triathlon
  1. monopoly on entry to UTMB effective immediately. The local race director getting licensing from UTMB for athletes to get points/stones for the UTMB lottery qualification just ended. This is what WTC did in Triathlon. How did that workout? A: lots of local races don't exist anymore. In fact some race series were bought by WTC to only close the very next year
  2. this will not be the end of the acquisition train and more is to follow. Especially considering Ironman Group is again private equity. Margins are actually small in these events so scale is critical for growth to in turn, sell again at profit.
  3. ironman athletes may cross pollinate to ultra but it won't happen other way around. Cost of entry huge and ultra trail running takes just as much training time (100K and 100M is a long way after all!). There will be friction in cultures. They are completely different. While I advocate how community driven triathlon is as it has commercialized the inverse of said community I have witnessed. That happens with growth. Big concern that creeps into ultratrail over next 5 years.
  4. somewhat sarcastic here but how long until Ironman Group sends cease and desist letters to races or people using the term "ultra". I mean, look at IronCowboy!

I can't wait to this little Kelowna 50K ultra in September. Ironically the race series owner used to take a team to UTMB via her series licensing. Typically every other year. I guess that just stopped. Exhibit A to above point #1.

Last, don't forget they were engaging with Abbott Major Marathons as well wanted to expand the big 6 to 8 and adding China and Thailand.

@rhyspencer
Quote Reply
Re: Ironman and UTMB Partnership [Fishbum] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Fishbum wrote:
ThailandUltras wrote:
Fishbum wrote:
The way I look at it and why I say they're not compatible is just the type of person that each race attracts. In my opinion I think you would be hard-pressed to find anyone who's done both iron Man and ultra trails to say that the crowd in ultra trail running would want all the commercialization that will be brought with something like iron Man at the helm.
.

.
.
I don't know who you hang out with but I know so many people who have done both Ultra-trails/North Face,Western States,Leadville.Badwater and Ironman's and Ultraman's that it wouldn't be worth trying to list them.They are usually a very different personality for sure but they are around in numbers.



I'm not quite sure what you're getting at with the last sentence that they are around in numbers?


And I'm quite certain we are all hanging out with very different people. At least here in central Pennsylvania we are
.

If you stay in your bubble then all you meet are people in your bubble.

I am very aware of a significant number of people who crossover between IM events, triathlons in general, and trail running events. Perhaps in the US people focus one just one sport (triathlon is one sport with three arms) but in NZ and Australia at least any number of us do not.

Trust me I’m a doctor!
Well, I have a PhD :-)
Quote Reply
Re: Ironman and UTMB Partnership [ultrasu] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Anyone know how the MTB community has reacted to IM Group's purchase of Cape Epic in 2017? I think cyclists who do that event may have a similar ethos to ultra trail runners.
Quote Reply
Re: Ironman and UTMB Partnership [s13tx] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
s13tx wrote:
Man, when I saw UTMB, I thought it was University of Texas Medical Branch.
as a texan i thought the same thing.

80/20 Endurance Ambassador
Quote Reply
Re: Ironman and UTMB Partnership [ultrasu] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
What this might mean for the future of ultras and trail running is so depressing. Ultra/trail is my background, and I hate to think what the commercialization and monetization will do to the spirit and experience. At least the smaller and local trail races will still be refuges.
Quote Reply
Re: Ironman and UTMB Partnership [ultrasu] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
ultrasu wrote:
I'd be interested to hear Dan's perspective on this news.

I believe that the goal of UTMB and Ironman is to build a business model in trail similar to what they have built in triathlon. Has Ironman become successful with this through a process of uniformity and replication? Is it necessary for them, in order to put on so many events, to some extent, create an assembly line model of race directing? Does that remove some of the soul of the original race?

Looking at some stats is appears that UTMB had approx 8000 participants across the various distances in their 2019 edition. I could see a large brand like Ironman wanting to be associated with this. But how does that translate to events like Western States with a field limit of 369 and zero chance to grow due to land restrictions? Even with the people who come along with the runners it’s still a relatively small crowd. Do any US events allow more than a few hundred runners? Assuming Ironman plans to get into the US trail running market it will be interesting to see how they try to grow events. A few years ago Leadville increased their field way too much and it was a bad experience for everyone.

Quote:
Does that remove some of the soul of the original race?
Yes. One thing I really like about trail races is they are each very different and the vibe is reflective of the team directing the event. For me they’d be much less fun if they were run under a single brand’s playbook and felt the same but in a different location.
Quote Reply
Re: Ironman and UTMB Partnership [IM-Yeti] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
IM-Yeti wrote:
What this might mean for the future of ultras and trail running is so depressing. Ultra/trail is my background, and I hate to think what the commercialization and monetization will do to the spirit and experience. At least the smaller and local trail races will still be refuges.




Exactly what you and others on here have said is spot on.
Quote Reply
Re: Ironman and UTMB Partnership [ultrasu] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Oh well.

Seems like a different breed.

I enjoy non MDot races better.

I dont like the brashness of it.

A lot more people are on the trails and looking for new ' extreme ' experiences. IRONMAN is seeing the trend and going with it.

I'll do trail races until they get too slick.
Quote Reply
Re: Ironman and UTMB Partnership [rhayden] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
only good of this is to attract more stacked field to races (pros).

alternatives are -

golden trail series

Sky runner series

xterra trail
Quote Reply
Re: Ironman and UTMB Partnership [synthetic] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I've been running ultras this year and like others said, the events are the farthest thing from ironman races.

the good news is that there seem to be way more small ultras you can choose to run as am alternative.
Quote Reply
Re: Ironman and UTMB Partnership [s13tx] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Haha same!
Quote Reply
Re: Ironman and UTMB Partnership [synthetic] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I like the Skyrunner series. Was contemplating the one they were going to do in Southern Alberta and also the one in Italy.
Quote Reply
Re: Ironman and UTMB Partnership [Ijustrun] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Ijustrun wrote:
ultrasu wrote:
I'd be interested to hear Dan's perspective on this news.

I believe that the goal of UTMB and Ironman is to build a business model in trail similar to what they have built in triathlon. Has Ironman become successful with this through a process of uniformity and replication? Is it necessary for them, in order to put on so many events, to some extent, create an assembly line model of race directing? Does that remove some of the soul of the original race?


Looking at some stats is appears that UTMB had approx 8000 participants across the various distances in their 2019 edition. I could see a large brand like Ironman wanting to be associated with this. But how does that translate to events like Western States with a field limit of 369 and zero chance to grow due to land restrictions? Even with the people who come along with the runners it’s still a relatively small crowd. Do any US events allow more than a few hundred runners? Assuming Ironman plans to get into the US trail running market it will be interesting to see how they try to grow events. A few years ago Leadville increased their field way too much and it was a bad experience for everyone.

Quote:
Does that remove some of the soul of the original race?

Yes. One thing I really like about trail races is they are each very different and the vibe is reflective of the team directing the event. For me they’d be much less fun if they were run under a single brand’s playbook and felt the same but in a different location.

That looks like a lot of synergy with Ironman under the Rock N Roll Marathon brand when you consider a Run Rock n' Roll Weekend has 20k participants across the four distances offered.

Washed up footy player turned Triathlete.
Quote Reply

Prev Next