iron_mike wrote:
surely brett sutton is tri's most famous example of this. i'm also a bit ambivalent about guilt by association when it comes to some coaches. salazar, for instance, wasn't only successful because he was doping his athletes. so if i'm a runner on the other side of the world who emails salazar sometimes to get advice about workouts or something, i don't think that my 'association' with him ought necessarily to cast doubt on my performances. . .
here is teh problem.
Names like Team Sky, US Postal, New York Yankees, Iten Kenya training group, Team La Vie Claire, Hicham El Geurrouj's training group, Italian 1990's XC ski team (the one that beat Norway at Lillehammar in the 4x10km), Charlie Francis' track group , Norwegian XC ski team, Chinese women runners, East German swim team, Salazar Oregon project and everyone of their peers are basically interchangeable in this discussion.
Anyone thinking that any of these organizations/groups are choir boys and is sitting around to playing nice to give the other group in their sport a leg up not doing everythng in the grey zone and red zone is in disneyland. This is like saying that the pros next weekend in Kona will not sit at the edge of the draft zone (of course they are). They will do everything they can possibly get away with before they get slapped, recoil, re plan, and go at it again. Vino winning the London Olympic gold medal after being slapped and told to sit out is the ultimate example, although Contador ranks highly for not repenting. But both are revered in their homelands (I really did enjoy Contador in his closing Vuelta taking 4th and winning on Angliru in an epic day).
Is Sir Mo playing hanky panky? Well I don't think any more than Bekele and Kipchoge. If we think they are all choir boys, then there is nothing more to discuss.