Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Prev Next
Re: Alberto Salazar receives 4 year ban from Athletics [iron_mike] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
iron_mike wrote:
surely brett sutton is tri's most famous example of this.

i'm also a bit ambivalent about guilt by association when it comes to some coaches. salazar, for instance, wasn't only successful because he was doping his athletes. so if i'm a runner on the other side of the world who emails salazar sometimes to get advice about workouts or something, i don't think that my 'association' with him ought necessarily to cast doubt on my performances. . .

here is teh problem.

Names like Team Sky, US Postal, New York Yankees, Iten Kenya training group, Team La Vie Claire, Hicham El Geurrouj's training group, Italian 1990's XC ski team (the one that beat Norway at Lillehammar in the 4x10km), Charlie Francis' track group , Norwegian XC ski team, Chinese women runners, East German swim team, Salazar Oregon project and everyone of their peers are basically interchangeable in this discussion.

Anyone thinking that any of these organizations/groups are choir boys and is sitting around to playing nice to give the other group in their sport a leg up not doing everythng in the grey zone and red zone is in disneyland. This is like saying that the pros next weekend in Kona will not sit at the edge of the draft zone (of course they are). They will do everything they can possibly get away with before they get slapped, recoil, re plan, and go at it again. Vino winning the London Olympic gold medal after being slapped and told to sit out is the ultimate example, although Contador ranks highly for not repenting. But both are revered in their homelands (I really did enjoy Contador in his closing Vuelta taking 4th and winning on Angliru in an epic day).

Is Sir Mo playing hanky panky? Well I don't think any more than Bekele and Kipchoge. If we think they are all choir boys, then there is nothing more to discuss.
Quote Reply
Re: Alberto Salazar receives 4 year ban from Athletics [devashish_paul] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
That’s exactly why it’s actually now on the ethics of the athletes w/ Salazar case.

He’s only going to secretly coach if the athletes want him to and actually don’t think anything was done wrong....

If he’s kicked to the curb quickly then you realize they stand for fair play. But if it becomes known that he’s “secretly” coaching it then becomes a tell on the athletes imo.

Brooks Doughtie, M.S.
Exercise Physiology
-USAT Level II
Quote Reply
Re: Alberto Salazar receives 4 year ban from Athletics [devashish_paul] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
devashish_paul wrote:
jkhayc wrote:
Wait, you're saying that one of the biggest coaches, personalities, and names in the entire sport of running receiving a 4 year ban is...yawn?

It is absolutely not the same as "any protour team director" getting a ban.



How is elite track any different from elite cycling. Lots of podiums to win, lots of glory to get, lots of egos at stack, margins between winning and losing = razor thin. So why would track be any cleaner than cycling (or NFL or NBA).

Exhibit A from 1988 in case anyone forgot about the legacy of doping in track:


Fuze
calling...
Can't complete call
We're sorry about that. Please try again or contact support if you continue to have issues.
CancelRetry
[/url]

From this image only Robson Da Silva and Calvin Smith are purported to be clean. Ray Stewart in last pace here with a blown hamstring architected lots of doping subsequently in Jamaican sprinting. Soooo, it all feels like a yawn especially when a coach who was an elite athlete during the same era is busted!!!!

I wish Dennis Mitchell got called to testify to Congress so he could give that excuse for his positive test live on C-Span. That would be amazing.
Quote Reply
Re: Alberto Salazar receives 4 year ban from Athletics [devashish_paul] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
devashish_paul wrote:

here is teh problem.

Names like Team Sky, US Postal, New York Yankees, Iten Kenya training group, Team La Vie Claire, Hicham El Geurrouj's training group, Italian 1990's XC ski team (the one that beat Norway at Lillehammar in the 4x10km), Charlie Francis' track group , Norwegian XC ski team, Chinese women runners, East German swim team, Salazar Oregon project and everyone of their peers are basically interchangeable in this discussion.

Anyone thinking that any of these organizations/groups are choir boys and is sitting around to playing nice to give the other group in their sport a leg up not doing everythng in the grey zone and red zone is in disneyland. This is like saying that the pros next weekend in Kona will not sit at the edge of the draft zone (of course they are). They will do everything they can possibly get away with before they get slapped, recoil, re plan, and go at it again.


snip



Is Sir Mo playing hanky panky? Well I don't think any more than Bekele and Kipchoge. If we think they are all choir boys, then there is nothing more to discuss.

This is where I'm at tbh. If its not illegal,then its legal. The rules are written, and then teams of lawyers see what ISN'T written. Its the nature of the sport at Pro Level. I'm not surprised Salazar was testing to see where the line is. Difference is that he clearly went over it in several areas that put him in violation of the rules.



Mentioning Sutton imo, is incorrect. His ban is not related to doping. IIRC His ban is related to training under 18s. I suspect that this background automatically precludes him from many federations. If not legally, but more for the PR side. Switzerland of course being famously neutral...
Quote Reply
Re: Alberto Salazar receives 4 year ban from Athletics [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Quote Reply
Re: Alberto Salazar receives 4 year ban from Athletics [BT_DreamChaser] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I was watching the 5000m yesterday iaaf championship. Klosterholfen not at a health weight at all. Look it up and who is involved Salazaar. Galen Rupp looks like he would get tired stirring spagetti sauce.

BT_DreamChaser wrote:
Dude used his own kids to experiment on. As a father I find that appalling. I'd never put a banned substance on any of my children for any reason, ever, period



Excerpt:


The Gatlin case involved testosterone so we decided to see if rubbing Androgel on an athlete after a race could cause a positive test. Dr. Jeffery Brown set up the experiment. Existing medical literature indicated that eight squirts of Androgel would cause a marked increase in male hormones within 15 minutes of being placed on the skin. Eight squirts, however, is a lot of Androgel and would be clearly noticed by the person on which it was being rubbed. The experiment was designed to see if lower amounts, which the athlete may not notice being applied could trigger a positive test. The subjects for the experiment were my sons, who are the same approximate age as typical elite athletes and are in good physical condition. But are not elite athletes subject to USADA or any other elite testing pool.

They constantly try to escape from the darkness outside and within
Dreaming of systems so perfect that no one will need to be good T.S. Eliot

Quote Reply
Re: Alberto Salazar receives 4 year ban from Athletics [Race1] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Race1 wrote:

Mentioning Sutton imo, is incorrect. His ban is not related to doping. IIRC His ban is related to training under 18s.


That's not correct. None of his criminal bans or ITU sanctions was related to minors according to any source material I can find. (Source1, Source2). Where they applied, they applied to all coaching, irrespective of age.
Last edited by: trail: Oct 6, 19 17:10
Quote Reply
Re: Alberto Salazar receives 4 year ban from Athletics [devashish_paul] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
devashish_paul wrote:

Is Sir Mo playing hanky panky? Well I don't think any more than Bekele and Kipchoge. If we think they are all choir boys, then there is nothing more to discuss.


No one is saying that because we we may want to take a closer look at Mo that it means that everyone else is clean. Present or past. Investigations into doping don't have to be "fair."

Continuously in this thread you seem to be posting as if you think we're all naive and had no idea what was and is going on, and you're doing us some kind of favor by informing us about reality. And using this as some sort of odd logic to suggest that we're over-excited about Salazar.

I don't think most in this thread are naive. Nor do I think the blase attitude that "everyone dopes, so why should we bother about Salazar's gray areas" is the general approach we should have to doping in sport. Yeah, all the sprinters in '88 were doping. So what? Does that mean we can no longer enforce doping in 2019?
Last edited by: trail: Oct 6, 19 17:20
Quote Reply
Re: Alberto Salazar receives 4 year ban from Athletics [hubcaps] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
hubcaps wrote:
FYI Goucher's response:

https://www.bbc.com/...t/athletics/49951671


From the article:
Nike has also said they will support Salazar's appeal and are paying Salazar and Dr Brown's legal bills.

Brooks Doughtie, M.S.
Exercise Physiology
-USAT Level II
Quote Reply
Re: Alberto Salazar receives 4 year ban from Athletics [nhoya] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
agreed and hassan's 3.51 1500 is a bit suspicious from 10k training (she is up against world class ladies who just specialise in the middle distances). I doubt she could do that before going to Salazar. I hate to say it but reminds me of Mo's 10k and ridiculous 1500m time. Is there something that special going on in Salazar's group that cant be done anywhere else?
Quote Reply
Re: Alberto Salazar receives 4 year ban from Athletics [B_Doughtie] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
B_Doughtie wrote:
hubcaps wrote:
FYI Goucher's response:

https://www.bbc.com/...t/athletics/49951671



From the article:
Nike has also said they will support Salazar's appeal and are paying Salazar and Dr Brown's legal bills.

I still can't find the explanation on why it was (according to the ruling) the Gouchers themselves who introduced Dr Brown to Salazar/NOP in the first place. Have they explained/been asked the background on this?
Quote Reply
Re: Alberto Salazar receives 4 year ban from Athletics [nhoya] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Couple things, the womens mile record is soft, should be around 4:08, so it's more like closing in 3:53 for the men. Secondly, Siffan runs a 65 half, which is pretty much dead on HM-pace for her, followed by a fast mile. The men finished with a 4:04 in a fast race.
There are some suspicious things about Siffan, but her 10k is not one of them.

Terrible Tuesday’s Triathlon
Quote Reply
Re: Alberto Salazar receives 4 year ban from Athletics [B_Doughtie] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Some UK news of Salazar and Mo Farah ...

https://www.bbc.com/...t/athletics/51591701

Edit :

This one is interesting also (appear as a link in the first article) :

https://www.bbc.com/...t/athletics/51599747
Last edited by: Pyrenean Wolf: Feb 24, 20 5:08
Quote Reply
Re: Alberto Salazar receives 4 year ban from Athletics [Pyrenean Wolf] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
LetsRun seems to believe that a major ban/bust is going to be revealed in the near future, wonder if it'll be Mo.
Quote Reply
Re: Alberto Salazar receives 4 year ban from Athletics [devashish_paul] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
devashish_paul wrote:
This would be in the same category of any protour team director getting a ban. Nothing to see, its just who gets banned and when and who escapes under the radar. Now imagine if USADA was all over the NFL or NBA, it would be a free for all, but they are not signatories.
Fuze
calling...
Can't complete call
We're sorry about that. Please try again or contact support if you continue to have issues.
CancelRetry
[/url]

There is a reason why no real money making professional sport league would use the USADA. During the Lance (regardless what you think of lance) case the USADA worked with the feds to make the case for them. No league will risk that.
Quote Reply
Re: Alberto Salazar receives 4 year ban from Athletics [jkhayc] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Yeah a lot of talk regarding Farah. If Mo is busted maybe Galen will get that London gold medal for 10k!?
Quote Reply
Re: Alberto Salazar receives 4 year ban from Athletics [Tri2win352] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Tri2win352 wrote:
Yeah a lot of talk regarding Farah. If Mo is busted maybe Galen will get that London gold medal for 10k!?

If that happens it will go to third place

Eric Reid AeroFit | Instagram Portfolio
Aerodynamic Retul Bike Fitting

“You are experiencing the criminal coverup of a foreign backed fascist hostile takeover of a mafia shakedown of an authoritarian religious slow motion coup. Persuade people to vote for Democracy.”
Quote Reply
Re: Alberto Salazar receives 4 year ban from Athletics [ericMPro] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I’m think Galen is home free but Mo seems to have his history of lies catching up to him regarding L- Carnitine dosages and also, and more importantly, his links to Jama Aden which he also lied about.
Quote Reply
Re: Alberto Salazar receives 4 year ban from Athletics [B_Doughtie] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
B_Doughtie wrote:
hubcaps wrote:
FYI Goucher's response:

https://www.bbc.com/...t/athletics/49951671



From the article:
Nike has also said they will support Salazar's appeal and are paying Salazar and Dr Brown's legal bills.


Capitalism doesn't care about right and wrong. Whether directly or indirectly, these guys bring in a lot of money for Nike, so they will protect their investment until it no longer makes financial sense to do so.
Last edited by: jhammond: Feb 24, 20 8:19
Quote Reply

Prev Next