DarkSpeedWorks wrote:
Quote:
l feel it’s worthwhile to bring attention to the fact that biological women who are competing for roster spots, trophies, records, scholarships, or paychecks also find it unfair that their events are open biological men and they may be burdened and forced to pay more or move to find areas that don’t allow biological men to compete and/or they suffer economic hardship by missing out on scholarships or opportunities or prize monies.No disagreement at all.
But do you sincerely think that Blakeman's approach with county facilities is the best way to achieve this goal, to address the issue quoted above?
Best? No idea.
But at times I certainly think the govt needs to step in. And title IX was ruled on 50+ years ago. This definitely undermines that.
So I like this option better than the lack of continuity that surely is a detriment to women seeking a fair opportunity and is almost certainly going to continue if it’s left up to individuals here there and everywhere.