Stay away from these clowns at the range 😜
In the foreground pic was cropped there is another rifle not pointed down range
In the foreground pic was cropped there is another rifle not pointed down range
Lavender Room
Login required to started new threads
Login required to post replies
Re: New ATF ruling on Pistol Braces. [jimatbeyond]
[ In reply to ]
Re: New ATF ruling on Pistol Braces. [Constantine]
[ In reply to ]
That looks like the Range Master, which makes it a double WTF?
"...the street finds its own uses for things"
"...the street finds its own uses for things"
Re: New ATF ruling on Pistol Braces. [patf]
[ In reply to ]
Long live the SBR , the ATF rule is dead.
Re: New ATF ruling on Pistol Braces. [Constantine]
[ In reply to ]
The ATF will appeal this ruling to the 5th Circuit Court and they will rule in favor of the plaintiffs.
The ATF will then appeal to the Supreme Court and they will rule in favor of the plaintiffs.
All of the ATF's interpretations of laws are about to come tumbling down. Bumpstocks will not be machineguns. Forced reset triggers will not be machineguns. 80% frames and receivers will not be firearms.
The ATF will then appeal to the Supreme Court and they will rule in favor of the plaintiffs.
All of the ATF's interpretations of laws are about to come tumbling down. Bumpstocks will not be machineguns. Forced reset triggers will not be machineguns. 80% frames and receivers will not be firearms.
Last edited by:
jimatbeyond: Nov 9, 23 14:54
Re: New ATF ruling on Pistol Braces. [Constantine]
[ In reply to ]
ATF just got kicked in the teeth again. Their partial frames and receivers rule just lost in the VanDerStok v. Garland case.
Re: New ATF ruling on Pistol Braces. [Constantine]
[ In reply to ]
The Supreme Court will be holding a conference tomorrow to decide if the VanDerStok case should be granted certiorari.
It only takes four votes to get it on to its next step.
I can easily see the court making a decision in the Cargill case and then doing a GVR on VanDerStok.
It only takes four votes to get it on to its next step.
I can easily see the court making a decision in the Cargill case and then doing a GVR on VanDerStok.
DarkSpeedWorks wrote:
That's a fascinating youtuber. I like his 'let's go Brandon t-shirt'.
And he mentions "the anti-gun industry". What is that exactly?
Obviously, the companies that produce and sell anti-guns.