My original post is below (shortened a tad). I'm adding a video with a bit more explanation:
======================================
So, I was turned on to this by Rappstar several years back. TSB just doesn't correspond with post-hoc PE analysis. Whereas, post-hoc analysis of ATL/CTL correlates incredibly well with post-hoc evaluation of PE. I emphasize post-hoc because of possibly masking effects (great topic covered here: velonews article) and the perceived immune suppression-related symptoms that occurs later, after the workout.
I designed a week around a desired daily ATL/CTL, keeping it under 1.50, which seems to correlate very well with over-training, injury, sickness.
I've then gone in and entered my Planned ATL/CTL values and solved for the daily total prescribed (Rx) TSS for that day, so it updates depending on the actual TSS from the previous day, and I stick with total TSS so it's at my discretion how I split up the TSS among sports.
======================================
So, I was turned on to this by Rappstar several years back. TSB just doesn't correspond with post-hoc PE analysis. Whereas, post-hoc analysis of ATL/CTL correlates incredibly well with post-hoc evaluation of PE. I emphasize post-hoc because of possibly masking effects (great topic covered here: velonews article) and the perceived immune suppression-related symptoms that occurs later, after the workout.
I designed a week around a desired daily ATL/CTL, keeping it under 1.50, which seems to correlate very well with over-training, injury, sickness.
I've then gone in and entered my Planned ATL/CTL values and solved for the daily total prescribed (Rx) TSS for that day, so it updates depending on the actual TSS from the previous day, and I stick with total TSS so it's at my discretion how I split up the TSS among sports.
Last edited by:
milesthedog: Jan 29, 24 12:52