Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Prev Next
IMTX race report – 9h09 – 19th in M40–44
Quote | Reply
   
Full report with pictures and such is here.

IMTX 2018 was my seventh participation in the event and my tenth full distance. Apart from 2014, which I failed to register for, I've done Texas every year, simply because it’s local. This year, it came after two good races in 2017, with a 9h38 at IMTX 2017 and a 9h32 at IMFL 2017. After these, both of which with pretty good runs, I had high aspiration for a break-through performance.
The race also came at an eventful time in my life, as I’m taking a new job in the fall, relocating to Europe over the summer, getting married shortly, selling my house … In short, preparation competed with a bunch of priorities. I imagine those of you doing this while raising children wouldn’t find that very impressive, but it was a bit of challenge for me.
Despite these competing priorities, my training block when well, and I felt that I was hitting the race in as good a shape as ever. That was good: With the prospect of relocating to Switzerland soon, IMTX 2018 is probably my last participation in the Woodlands—no offense, but the prospect of riding Hardy toll road is hardly a compelling argument—so I wanted to make it count.
François has coached me since 2012, so he knows me. He also felt that Texas could be a good race. He had figured that I could build on Florida to shave another ~15 minutes for a 9h15 target (1h10 swim, 4h50 bike, 3h10 run with 5 minutes in transitions). Toying with this in the final week, I felt that that was possible.
I knew that going under 9h15 might put me on the bubble for Kona—I missed qualifying by 2m8s and one spot in Florida, so I wasn’t that far off. But KQ wasn’t really the goal: I don’t have an interest in going anyway and, besides, IMTX is ridiculously stacked and I can’t control who shows up. Still, getting a qualifying time would be a nice way to say goodbye.
Swim: (1:10:16 – Garmin distance: 4,406m / 1:52min/100m)
Being a so-so swimmer, I welcomed the news that wetsuits would be authorized. When I went to pick up my packet on Wednesday, I toyed with the idea of getting a Röka to replace my X-Terra, which I had received as a prize for winning HITS Ocala (how’s that for a backdoor brag?), but which felt overly warm. However, I eventually decided against it. Of course that decision haunted me for two days, and when I was back at the expo after dropping my bike on Friday, I swung by the Röka booth, picked up a suit—the last one in my size!—and headed straight to Rice’s pool for a quick try out.
Fast forward a few hours, and I’m on the start line, seeding right around the 1h10 mark. The beginning was surprisingly mellow, and I felt for a while that the swim would be a breeze. But contact increased around the first buoy and remained sustained until the beginning of the canal.
My Garmin recorded 4,046m, and I’ve seen others that were right on 3.8km, which suggests that the course was well measured but that my open-water swimming abilities are still crap. If I’m perfectly honest, that’s not entirely surprising.
Overall it was pretty uneventful, and I was glad to exit the water right on my expected time at 1h10m16s, a PR. That’s nowhere close to the fast swimmers, but right on where I needed to be for my goals.
Bike: (4:39:14 for 176.58km, 214 AP, 225 NP)
I had high aspirations for the bike, particularly because it has improved significantly in the last 18 months. Last year, I biked a 5h02 in Texas (196W AP, 204W NP) and a 4h50 in Florida (208W AP, 215W NP), so there was a nice progression. But this year’s training block finished strong, including a couple of 4h+ rides on the trainer around 230240W. So, we knew that I had a better bike fitness than ever.
I also modified my nutrition strategy, opting for four bottles of Infinit (two on the bike, two in special needs) with ~300 cals in each, plus a bunch of Powergel Shots and Sports Beans, as well as a flask with 5 gels. This turned out to be a good call, and I’ll continue this approach, as I felt fueled up throughout and didn’t have any GI issues.
The bike started innocuously enough, but by the time I made it to the Hardy Toll Road, it was clear that some guys weren’t dropping back as they should when you passed them. One in particular, was jumping on the wheel of anyone passing him, swaying dangerously doing so, and he almost took me out, twice. It doesn’t help my patriotic pride that he turned out to be French (and, yes, dude, I’ve got your number).
After the first turn around, a guy closeby suggested that we slingshot legally. So we started working, him, me, and another fellow, and for a few minutes of the first north-bound leg we passed one another,
dropping out of the envelope each time we were overtaken before taking our turn. But doing so required me to push too much power, and I let them go. (Kudos 309 for racing cleaning, as far as I can tell.)
There was another fellow who did a great job, but I can’t remember his number. 52 years old, with a black and orange race suit. He never took anybody’s draft and was overall very clean. I saw him after the finish and when I congratulated him on keeping things legal, he seemed to care: for the people attempting to race clean, it feels like any recognition of these efforts was much appreciated.
For the most part, though, the drafting just kept getting worse and worse. There was a group of 20 or so with which I traded places for a while towards the end of my ride. When they passed me, I dropped out of the envelope, feeling frustrated about how much soft pedaling that required. Then I’d overtake them and, for a while, stayed clear in the front. But I didn’t have the output to fully drop them and, after a while, they slowly crept back up. Rinse, repeat. I called them out: “you are aware that this is a non-drafting race, aren’t you?” and if feels that that bothered some. For the most part, however, they kept on coasting. I’ve got one number.
Overall, there’s no doubt that I benefited from being in the vicinity of such a fast mass of air moving in the right direction. It’s a little hard to be conclusive even with the data, because the fourth quarter of my ride corresponds not just to trading places with that group but also with going back north when there was now a significant tailwind that was helping, and a drop in speed when we exited Hardy to get back to T2.
But dealing with the group wasn’t just a positive. I also felt frustrated, and I feel that I expended a lot of nervous energy on the course. I guess I need to learn to chill.
At any rate, I got into T2 after 4h39 on the bike, another PR.
Run: (3:12:26 for 42.44km / 4:32 min/km)
The run is where I usually pick up people. After my epiphany of last year, where I realized that I was able to run a 3h12 in an IM and repeating the feat—albeit a little slower, 3h18—in Florida six months later, I had big hopes for this race, with a possible 3h10. My run training had come out well, and I thought that was a possibility. And, indeed, it was fun to pick up some of the guys—and gals—who had passed me as part of a horde on the bike. I was able to stay focused and keep a decent pace throughout, fueling primarily with coke at each station without having to stop or walk.
Sticking with my long-lasting decision to not piss on myself—we all have to draw the line somewhere—I stopped early in the run my only pee break of the day. That took 68 seconds or so, but who’s counting?
For the most part, the run was uneventful, aside from side stitches that came and went, and those that came around km 38 and didn’t leave me until the finish line, despite my best efforts.
I don’t remember anybody passing me on the run except for a guy that I had passed on the bike. Slim fellow with a 27 on the calf. He passed me halfway through the third loop, and I had absolutely nothing; the guy was flying. It was particularly impressive because I don’t get passed much on the run, but this dude was in a class of his own.
Anyway, I gave it all I had, and that got me to the line in 9h09:17.
Epilogue
9h09 is as fast as I could have gone on the day, so I’m delighted about this. It’s the result of a strong training block and as good an execution on race day as I could hope to put together, so I have no regrets whatsoever. 9h09 was also good enough for … wait for it … a whooping 19th in the M40–44 age group! And that’s a source of frustration.
What I am pissed about is the despicable attitude of many of the competitors and the downright inept organization
Inept organization
WTC dropped the ball before, during, and after the race. They weren’t able to provide an appropriately measured by bike course, even though they not only had a closed highway to work with, they also had data from last year! dudes, What else do you need?
During the race, they failed to produce a single marshal on the ride—not a single motorcycle to police over 2,000 age groupers.
And since the race, we haven’t heard anything from them. To my knowledge, they haven’t admitted to doing anything wrong, extended apologies, or provided remedial actions to ensure that last year would be better. Last year, there was a sustained presence of marshals and I remember the penalty tents overflowing with competitors. In other words, nothing gave the impression that this year would be such chaos. But, based on this year’s data, we should assume that 2019 will be run in a similar amateurish way. If you have higher expectations, prepare to be disappointed.
Prevalent cheating(?)
Even before the race, there were strange events. Someone found a testosterone patch in one of the hotels hosting participants a couple of days before the race.
Right after the finish line, I bumped into a guy I know who had finished ahead of me. When I told him how disgusted I was about the drafting, he shrugged as if to say “it is what it is,” which I interpreted as an admission of partaking in the group ride. Looking at how he went through the time checks (thanks for the data, Alan Couzens), he crossed every one of them with at least a handful of people within 12 seconds, and he crossed several time checks with the same people. Now, there are scenarii in which such data are coherent with racing legally: it could be that people were drafting off of him. It is also possible that no drafting was involved, and he was just passing people or being passed legally. Nonetheless, in my arguably biased opinion, it’s hard to conclude that it was all kosher.
I haven’t checked the slot allocation, but assuming that M 40–44 gets 10 spots, like last year, qualifying would have required me to come in in 8h47. That’s a seriously fast field! A 9h09 last year would have bought me third place; now, I barely make the first page of results.
Even after ten days, it’s hard to feel great about the race. And I should feel great, with a massive PR in the swim and bike (and a PR on the run missed only by seconds). Yet there’s a bitter aftertaste.
Oh, well. The nice part is that I’m headed to the Swiss mountains. My next race will be on a course that has some serious climbs. That way, I’ll know that the guys who beat me actually had to work for it.
Thanks
I’m immensely grateful to various people for getting me here. Leslie gave me the time to prepare for this, which came at a very steep price, especially as the third race in a series that saw one race every six months. François did a fantastic job preparing me. You got me from a 11h22 in 2011 to a 9h09 this year. I thought that a sub 10 would be hard to get; I never thought that a low 9h was in the cards for me, so merci, l’ami ! And, last but not least, Fred, who’s been the best race-day support you could hope for at every single one of my participations in Texas. Merci, Fred. On fait la prochaine en Europe !

Full report with pictures and such is here.

http://powerful-problem-solving.com
Last edited by: Arnaud: May 10, 18 16:48
Quote Reply
Re: IMTX race report – 9h09 – 19th in M40–44 [Arnaud] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
It seemed like a tough day out there for the few that tried to ride fair. Kudos for you admitting the advantage, but why would you call that a PR ride knowing it was 109 miles and assisted?? You go on to complain about WTC and the enforcement and course itself, so why not be honest with yourself and just put that time our to pasture??
Quote Reply
Re: IMTX race report – 9h09 – 19th in M40–44 [monty] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Why worry about what a person personally considers an accomplishment?

And as a participant, its frustrating to constantly hear "few" that rode fair (this isnt solely directed at you, but the constant second guessing that anyone rode correctly). Maybe those on the pointy end that were competing for spots in Kona were cheating at a high rate. But in the grand scheme, thats a few people. There was a lot of bad riding and it frustrated me even at the MOP. But there are lots of us who already have to deal with a short course casting a shadow on the hard work. Dont de-legitimize more and make it seem like 2500 people cheated. Ill give you 10% or 250, but thats not most. In any case, you cant say "few" rode clean.
Quote Reply
Re: IMTX race report – 9h09 – 19th in M40–44 [Arnaud] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
curious, how much do you weigh?
Quote Reply
Re: IMTX race report – 9h09 – 19th in M40–44 [KG6] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
KG6 wrote:
Why worry about what a person personally considers an accomplishment?

Because it is ST’s MO to villify every person that is happy with their race at IMTX.
Quote Reply
Re: IMTX race report – 9h09 – 19th in M40–44 [pokey] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
72 – 73kg (and 1m83)

http://powerful-problem-solving.com
Quote Reply
Re: IMTX race report – 9h09 – 19th in M40–44 [KG6] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I dont worry about what people think about what they did, but I'm a stickler in my own life and sport on what I actually accomplished. And dont kid yourself, most people cheated that day. On one part of the course where we got a snapshot, we could see packs of 40 to 70 riders with a few inbetween. And I'm confident that the few in-between got caught up later at some point, and a lot of them became pack riders, or a few minutes, or hours. It would have been very rare of any rider to have riden that course legally for all 112 miles. We have reports from the top AG men who said as much.

And as to the short course, how could anyone call that a PR? I mean if you add 3 miles or so to your time and then you PR'd, then fine, you are using a mph for a 112 mile course and that is legit. But like a downstream swim that pros swam in 35 minutes, it just doesn't seem like that should go down as your PR at the water cooler the next day at work..I guess I just dont like people that dont tell the truth..
Quote Reply
Re: IMTX race report – 9h09 – 19th in M40–44 [monty] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I just assumed that it was valid. For the record, my Garmin measured this year's course as a tad longer than last year's (177km vs. 176km). Are we ditching last year's results as well? Was that the collective wisdom, because I missed it. Besides, we already ditched the ones in 2016, so now do I get 3 years of data that I can't look at?

When HITS canceled Ocala's swim in 2017 (for thunder, they're actually better organized than WTC) or IMTX shortened the ride by ~1h in 2016, I understand the concept of not validating the record personally. This is why I never thought of myself as a 9h01 finisher, or whatever I did on one of those.

When the bike course is 3km short, I tend to think that this, unfortunately, falls within the error bounds of WTC's course design.

http://powerful-problem-solving.com
Quote Reply
Re: IMTX race report – 9h09 – 19th in M40–44 [Arnaud] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Arnaud wrote:
Besides, we already ditched the ones in 2016, so now do I get 3 years of data that I can't look at?

No, just stop feeling the need to be validated on SLOWtwitch.
Quote Reply
Re: IMTX race report – 9h09 – 19th in M40–44 [Arnaud] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
When the bike course is 3km short, I tend to think that this, unfortunately, falls within the error bounds of WTC's course design. //

Hey listen, you can do whatever you want. For me if I know a course is 109 miles, I will add the 3 miles to my time. The promoters may not be able to measure a correct course, but I sure as hell can adjust my time afterwards to know what I really would have done on a correct course. And yes, I would have adjusted the short course last year too. It is not that hard to know what you would have done on a legit measured course on a given day. If the run was a mile long and I ran 3 hours, I would subtract 6;52. And I'm sure if a course Is long everyone makes a special note to all who care in their worlds, and their log books. Just seems odd to me that short courses dont get the same attention.




Last edited by: monty: May 10, 18 17:26
Quote Reply
Re: IMTX race report – 9h09 – 19th in M40–44 [monty] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Quote:
It would have been very rare of any rider to have riden that course legally for all 112 miles. We have reports from the top AG men who said as much.

So the top AG men who were most affected by the groups and will be most biased speak for the people stretched out for miles on the course. Those 40+ person pelotons definitely existed. I saw them. Good thing about the out and back is I saw them even if they were ahead or behind me. There were about 4 pretty big packs and only one or two were REALLY big. That's where I come up with the 250 number. And you are right that there was also plenty of bad riding on other sections by riders with a different pace, so it's not like if you weren't part of that draft fest, you were clean. But that stuff is the stuff that is at every race I've ever been in. Not anything to hang on IMTX specifically. I got passed on my first lap by two of the big packs. I saw a few that were already ahead of me that had made the turn when I was heading south. After they cleared me, it wasn't hard at all to ride a typical race. For the people at the pointy end, they had to deal with it the whole time. I know that is frustrating and this was definitely worse than most if not all races. But it's still small compared to the overall number of competitors.
Quote Reply
Re: IMTX race report – 9h09 – 19th in M40–44 [KG6] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I'm not going to argue with you on this, the video speaks for itself. Did you see that fwy footage of one spot on the course? If not, you should take a look. It went on for quite sometime. If you count the size of the packs, the others in positions of drafting, you will find on this one tiny spot that most were drafting. And like I said, it would be herculean to have avoided all of that on the other 108 miles of the course that the video did not show. I dont need to guess that most drafted, it is right there on the tape, I suggest you take a look at it and then come back and tell me the only a few of the 2500 drafted..
Quote Reply
Re: IMTX race report – 9h09 – 19th in M40–44 [Arnaud] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Good race, good report. Best wishes on your move. IMTX 2019
Quote Reply
Re: IMTX race report – 9h09 – 19th in M40–44 [monty] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Ok. Throughout my time racing, if the distance was grossly inaccurate, I've discarded it. Otherwise, I have kept the official time. I have never subtracted time to long courses or added time to short ones, so the double standard that you describe doesn't apply to my approach.

http://powerful-problem-solving.com
Quote Reply
Re: IMTX race report – 9h09 – 19th in M40–44 [Arnaud] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Nice run
Quote Reply
Re: IMTX race report – 9h09 – 19th in M40–44 [monty] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Way to hijack this thread guys.

Congratulations on a strong race! Best of luck the rest of the year.

-
"It's nice to be great, but far greater to be nice"
Quote Reply
Re: IMTX race report – 9h09 – 19th in M40–44 [yoe400800] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
yoe400800 wrote:
Way to hijack this thread guys.

Congratulations on a strong race! Best of luck the rest of the year.

Seems an innocuous thing to pick up on despite it being an odd thing to say. Well done on your race mate. Maybe edit out the PR bit though?!
Quote Reply
Re: IMTX race report – 9h09 – 19th in M40–44 [Arnaud] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Congrats on a great race execution. Its a shame there were obviously cheats on the course, and WTC did not step up to ensure a fair race. Nevertheless you did what you could with what you had. Well Done!!!!

He who understands the WHY, will understand the HOW.
Quote Reply
Re: IMTX race report – 9h09 – 19th in M40–44 [Arnaud] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Great race, congrats! To what do you attribute your fast run split? Would you mind shedding a little light on your training volume and area(s) of focus, specifically miles/week of running?
Quote Reply
Re: IMTX race report – 9h09 – 19th in M40–44 [STJ_2028] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I have Arnaud run in vibrams all the time, off the bike 4 times a week, he does a lot of running drills, and he lifts a lot ;)

More seriously, no secret. I have him run 5 days a week most weeks. A long run throughout the year with pace work when races are close, some speedwork early in the season, transitioning to tempo as IM looms. A few short runs off the bike towards the end of the preparation.

Off the top of my head, his biggest run week was about 55mi with a large chunk done around 7:30/mi.

I guess the key is that we have worked together for a long while, he and I communicate very well, so it's been easy to make sure he is consistent with training. But there really is no secret.
Quote Reply
Re: IMTX race report – 9h09 – 19th in M40–44 [STJ_2028] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Thanks for the kind words!

I attribute my faster run split to the fact that running agrees with my body … the way swimming disagrees with it. :-)
François can provide another perspective on the run.

Pragmatically, in the weeks prior to the race, he had me do five runs a week:
– Tuesday – 60 minutes tempo 4x8min @ 10k pace with 2min rest
– Wednesday – 50 minutes aero
– Thursday – 50 minutes hill repeats, 6x3min hard, 3 min easy
– Saturday – 30 or 40 minutes brick off the bike, including 15 min tempo
– Sunday – long (up to 2.5h)

That added up to 65 – 85 km per week.

http://powerful-problem-solving.com
Quote Reply
Re: IMTX race report – 9h09 – 19th in M40–44 [Francois] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
That's right, we communicate very well. I insult him, and he insults me right back.

http://powerful-problem-solving.com
Quote Reply
Re: IMTX race report – 9h09 – 19th in M40–44 [Arnaud] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Connard de Versaillais.
Quote Reply
Re: IMTX race report – 9h09 – 19th in M40–44 [Francois] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
'foiré et XVIème-ard. Les boules.

http://powerful-problem-solving.com
Quote Reply
Re: IMTX race report – 9h09 – 19th in M40–44 [Francois] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
i hate french people.... but good race boys!

Jonathan Caron / Professional Coach / ironman champions / age group world champions
Jonnyo Coaching
Instargram
Quote Reply

Prev Next