Ah, I see what you're saying. Still, with the raw data I think all you could do would be to change the weighting of the time spent at each apparent wind angle. For example, he used a 30 degree angle for 5% of the ride. If I have a 30 mph 30 degree apparent wind, I'm either close to sitting still or that storm has a name. In either case, it's time for me to go home.
There is no way I could take that data and try to apply it to a real world race course. You or I might use different assumptions to define expected racing conditions but the results would still be so specific to those assumptions that the only conclusions I could draw would still have to be generalized ones like the ones I stated above.
There is no way I could take that data and try to apply it to a real world race course. You or I might use different assumptions to define expected racing conditions but the results would still be so specific to those assumptions that the only conclusions I could draw would still have to be generalized ones like the ones I stated above.