Would you pay a trillion bucks for Montana?

Feb 15, 19 11:25

Post #1 of 29 Views: 1527

Just what Canada needs, more empty space......

ttps://http://www.bing.com/...amp;filters=tnTID%3d"056253EF-B47A-464e-8369-2AE83D640E4C"+Segment%3d"popularnow.carousel"&nvaug=%5bNewsVertical+topicviewtype%3d"2"%5d&qpvt=Montana+to+Canada+petition&FORM=EWRE

Re: Would you pay a trillion bucks for Montana? [cerveloguy] [ In reply to ]

Feb 15, 19 11:27

Post #2 of 29 Views: 1509

Too far away and not enough lakes for my liking. Can we buy Minnesota instead?

How does Danny Hart sit down with balls that big?

Re: Would you pay a trillion bucks for Montana? [cerveloguy] [ In reply to ]

Feb 15, 19 11:31

Post #3 of 29 Views: 1480

And it's a pretty good deal. It's only about $30 per person in Canada.

How does Danny Hart sit down with balls that big?

Re: Would you pay a trillion bucks for Montana? [BLeP] [ In reply to ]

Feb 15, 19 11:38

Post #4 of 29 Views: 1468

BLeP wrote:

And it's a pretty good deal. It's only about $30 per person in Canada.

$30,000?

Or is the exchange rate that bad now?

Re: Would you pay a trillion bucks for Montana? [BLeP] [ In reply to ]

Feb 15, 19 11:41

Post #5 of 29 Views: 1450

BLeP wrote:

And it's a pretty good deal. It's only about $30 per person in Canada.

I think you need to check your math. You're off by several orders of magnitude.

Re: Would you pay a trillion bucks for Montana? [wimsey] [ In reply to ]

Feb 15, 19 11:45

Post #6 of 29 Views: 1436

Re: Would you pay a trillion bucks for Montana? [wimsey] [ In reply to ]

Feb 15, 19 11:51

Post #7 of 29 Views: 1424

wimsey wrote:

BLeP wrote:

And it's a pretty good deal. It's only about $30 per person in Canada.

I think you need to check your math. You're off by several orders of magnitude.

It’s possible that I missed a few 0s. Are we really going to quibble over $000? Just give us Minnesota already.

How does Danny Hart sit down with balls that big?

Last edited by: BLeP: Feb 15, 19 11:51

Re: Would you pay a trillion bucks for Montana? [BLeP] [ In reply to ]

Feb 15, 19 12:00

Post #8 of 29 Views: 1401

BLeP wrote:

wimsey wrote:

BLeP wrote:

And it's a pretty good deal. It's only about $30 per person in Canada.

I think you need to check your math. You're off by several orders of magnitude.

It’s possible that I missed a few 0s. Are we really going to quibble over $000? Just give us Minnesota already.

Jerry: "Double zero?"

George: "It's 'ooh', As in 'ooh ooh ah ah.'"

Last edited by: wimsey: Feb 15, 19 12:02

Re: Would you pay a trillion bucks for Montana? [BLeP] [ In reply to ]

Feb 15, 19 12:04

Post #9 of 29 Views: 1379

BLeP wrote:

wimsey wrote:

BLeP wrote:

And it's a pretty good deal. It's only about $30 per person in Canada.

I think you need to check your math. You're off by several orders of magnitude.

It’s possible that I missed a few 0s. Are we really going to quibble over $000? Just give us Minnesota already.

You may have the mosquitoes in the Boundary Waters and perhaps the town of Bemidji. Now pay up, cheapskate.

Re: Would you pay a trillion bucks for Montana? [wimsey] [ In reply to ]

Feb 15, 19 12:07

Post #10 of 29 Views: 1366

wimsey wrote:

BLeP wrote:

wimsey wrote:

BLeP wrote:

And it's a pretty good deal. It's only about $30 per person in Canada.

I think you need to check your math. You're off by several orders of magnitude.

It’s possible that I missed a few 0s. Are we really going to quibble over $000? Just give us Minnesota already.

You may have the mosquitoes in the Boundary Waters and perhaps the town of Bemidji. Now pay up, cheapskate.

We'll take the mosquitoes if it comes with the Boundary Waters. You can keep the rest of your snow ridden state.

We'll give you a loonie.

How does Danny Hart sit down with balls that big?

Re: Would you pay a trillion bucks for Montana? [BLeP] [ In reply to ]

Feb 15, 19 12:10

Post #11 of 29 Views: 1356

BLeP wrote:

wimsey wrote:

BLeP wrote:

wimsey wrote:

BLeP wrote:

And it's a pretty good deal. It's only about $30 per person in Canada.

I think you need to check your math. You're off by several orders of magnitude.

It’s possible that I missed a few 0s. Are we really going to quibble over $000? Just give us Minnesota already.

You may have the mosquitoes in the Boundary Waters and perhaps the town of Bemidji. Now pay up, cheapskate.

We'll take the mosquitoes if it comes with the Boundary Waters. You can keep the rest of your snow ridden state.

We'll give you a loonie.

I feel dirty just typing this, but you're welcome.

https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/mammals/moose.html

Re: Would you pay a trillion bucks for Montana? [BLeP] [ In reply to ]

Feb 15, 19 12:12

Post #12 of 29 Views: 1352

BLeP wrote:

wimsey wrote:

BLeP wrote:

wimsey wrote:

BLeP wrote:

And it's a pretty good deal. It's only about $30 per person in Canada.

I think you need to check your math. You're off by several orders of magnitude.

It’s possible that I missed a few 0s. Are we really going to quibble over $000? Just give us Minnesota already.

You may have the mosquitoes in the Boundary Waters and perhaps the town of Bemidji. Now pay up, cheapskate.

We'll take the mosquitoes if it comes with the Boundary Waters. You can keep the rest of your snow ridden state.

We'll give you a loonie.

No, you misunderstand. You get only the mosquitoes, though we will throw in the black flies gratis. If you want the Boundary Waters, that shit costs extra. A lot extra.

Re: Would you pay a trillion bucks for Montana? [wimsey] [ In reply to ]

Feb 15, 19 12:13

Post #13 of 29 Views: 1349

As long as we don't have to take that shithole Wisconsin. I hear bad lawyers breed like rats there.

===============
Proud member of the MSF (Maple Syrup Mafia)

Re: Would you pay a trillion bucks for Montana? [cerveloguy] [ In reply to ]

Feb 15, 19 12:16

Post #14 of 29 Views: 1343

cerveloguy wrote:

Just what Canada needs, more empty space......

ttps://http://www.bing.com/...amp;filters=tnTID%3d"056253EF-B47A-464e-8369-2AE83D640E4C"+Segment%3d"popularnow.carousel"&nvaug=%5bNewsVertical+topicviewtype%3d"2"%5d&qpvt=Montana+to+Canada+petition&FORM=EWRE

I would consider a trillion dollars to be a low ball offer for Montana.

Suffer Well.

Re: Would you pay a trillion bucks for Montana? [CaptainCanada] [ In reply to ]

Feb 15, 19 12:19

Post #15 of 29 Views: 1337

CaptainCanada wrote:

As long as we don't have to take that shithole Wisconsin. I hear bad lawyers breed like rats there.

Re: Would you pay a trillion bucks for Montana? [wimsey] [ In reply to ]

Feb 15, 19 12:27

Post #16 of 29 Views: 1319

wimsey wrote:

No, you misunderstand. You get only the mosquitoes, though we will throw in the black flies gratis. If you want the Boundary Waters, that shit costs extra. A lot extra.

No, you are the one who does not understand. You will give us the Boundary Waters and you will build a wall around it on your own land outside of the Boundary Waters. You can declare a national emergency to pay for it, whatever.

I am giving you 1 Canadian dollar.

Do it.

Don't make me send in our troop.

How does Danny Hart sit down with balls that big?

Re: Would you pay a trillion bucks for Montana? [BLeP] [ In reply to ]

Feb 15, 19 12:29

Post #17 of 29 Views: 1313

BLeP wrote:

wimsey wrote:

Don't make me send in our troop.

This made me laugh.

Re: Would you pay a trillion bucks for Montana? [BLeP] [ In reply to ]

Feb 15, 19 12:45

Post #18 of 29 Views: 1283

You can have the polluted southern ones, we are keeping the clean ones up north.

Pactimo brand ambassador, ask me about promo codes

Re: Would you pay a trillion bucks for Montana? [BLeP] [ In reply to ]

Feb 15, 19 13:24

Post #19 of 29 Views: 1234

BLeP wrote:

wimsey wrote:

No, you misunderstand. You get only the mosquitoes, though we will throw in the black flies gratis. If you want the Boundary Waters, that shit costs extra. A lot extra.

No, you are the one who does not understand. You will give us the Boundary Waters and you will build a wall around it on your own land outside of the Boundary Waters. You can declare a national emergency to pay for it, whatever.

I am giving you 1 Canadian dollar.

Do it.

Don't make me send in our troop.

Boy Scouts or Eagle Scouts (or are they the same thing)?

Re: Would you pay a trillion bucks for Montana? [cerveloguy] [ In reply to ]

Feb 15, 19 13:32

Post #20 of 29 Views: 1224

Buy Montana and we’ll throw in New Jersey for free.

Re: Would you pay a trillion bucks for Montana? [BLeP] [ In reply to ]

Feb 15, 19 18:50

Post #21 of 29 Views: 1119

BLeP wrote:

wimsey wrote:

No, you misunderstand. You get only the mosquitoes, though we will throw in the black flies gratis. If you want the Boundary Waters, that shit costs extra. A lot extra.

No, you are the one who does not understand. You will give us the Boundary Waters and you will build a wall around it on your own land outside of the Boundary Waters. You can declare a national emergency to pay for it, whatever.

I am giving you 1 Canadian dollar.

Do it.

Don't make me send in our troop.

We are not dumb enough to put the wall on the wrong side of an important source of freshwater and restrict our access to it. That is FAKE NEWS.

Re: Would you pay a trillion bucks for Montana? [JD21] [ In reply to ]

Feb 15, 19 18:57

Post #22 of 29 Views: 1109

JD21 wrote:

Buy Montana and we’ll throw in New Jersey for free.

It was looking like a sweet deal until you brought up New Jersey.

Long Chile was a silly place.

Re: Would you pay a trillion bucks for Montana? [BCtriguy1] [ In reply to ]

Feb 15, 19 19:03

Post #23 of 29 Views: 1099

BCtriguy1 wrote:

JD21 wrote:

Buy Montana and we’ll throw in New Jersey for free.

It was looking like a sweet deal until you brought up New Jersey.[/quote

NJ - where they murda each other as well as the English language. Just cut out Camden and the area across the Hudson from NYC and a few other areas and it might not be too bad. Southern NJ is actually quite nice.

Re: Would you pay a trillion bucks for Montana? [BCtriguy1] [ In reply to ]

Feb 15, 19 19:12

Post #24 of 29 Views: 1079

BCtriguy1 wrote:

JD21 wrote:

Buy Montana and we’ll throw in New Jersey for free.

It was looking like a sweet deal until you brought up New Jersey.

You have to take New Jersey and all of its residents.

If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went. - Will Rogers

Emery's Third Coast Triathlon | Tri Wisconsin Triathlon Team | Push Endurance | GLWR

Re: Would you pay a trillion bucks for Montana? [JSA] [ In reply to ]

Feb 15, 19 19:36

Post #25 of 29 Views: 1055

Ok ok. California has an awesome bullet train to throw into the deal. Along w NJ, let’s get this done!

Re: Would you pay a trillion bucks for Montana? [torrey] [ In reply to ]

Feb 15, 19 19:47

Post #26 of 29 Views: 254

torrey wrote:

BLeP wrote:

wimsey wrote:

No, you misunderstand. You get only the mosquitoes, though we will throw in the black flies gratis. If you want the Boundary Waters, that shit costs extra. A lot extra.

No, you are the one who does not understand. You will give us the Boundary Waters and you will build a wall around it on your own land outside of the Boundary Waters. You can declare a national emergency to pay for it, whatever.

I am giving you 1 Canadian dollar.

Do it.

Don't make me send in our troop.

We are not dumb enough to put the wall on the wrong side of an important source of freshwater and restrict our access to it. That is FAKE NEWS.

Chapeau.

How does Danny Hart sit down with balls that big?

Re: Would you pay a trillion bucks for Montana? [JSA] [ In reply to ]

Feb 15, 19 19:59

Post #27 of 29 Views: 247

JSA wrote:

BCtriguy1 wrote:

JD21 wrote:

Buy Montana and we’ll throw in New Jersey for free.

It was looking like a sweet deal until you brought up New Jersey.

You have to take New Jersey and all of its residents.

Fine, but, we are 'gifting' Quebec to you. Enjoy.

Long Chile was a silly place.

Re: Would you pay a trillion bucks for Montana? [cerveloguy] [ In reply to ]

Feb 16, 19 4:13

Post #28 of 29 Views: 211

Montana? There's nothing wrong with Montana. Boring yes, but no real problems. Can't we sell them Alabama instead?

Take a short break from ST and read my blog:
http://tri-banter.blogspot.com/

Re: Would you pay a trillion bucks for Montana? [cerveloguy] [ In reply to ]

Feb 16, 19 5:04

Post #29 of 29 Views: 196

Yes

They constantly try to escape from the darkness outside and within
Dreaming of systems so perfect that no one will need to be good T.S. Eliot

Last edited by: len: Feb 16, 19 5:07

Our Partners

transition-DOT-area-AT-slowtwitch-DOT-com

Advertise with us

©1999-2024 Slowtwitch, Inc., and Slowtwitch.com
Reproduction of material from any Slowtwitch.com page
without written permission is strictly prohibited.