Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals
Quote | Reply
It's no secret that housing in San Francisco is so expensive even people drawing fairly nice incomes -- such as non-Facebook, non-Google and non-Silicon Valley-type professionals -- can't afford to live there. In 2017, median rents for a one-bedroom apartment in the city by the bay ran from $3,333 (according to Abodo) to Zumper's $3,400 monthly.

For comparison, the median rent nationwide in 2017 was $845 month split between Houston, Texas and Anchorage, Alaska. San Fran landlords also typically demand a relatively high credit score (north of 730 FICO) plus first and last month's rent and a security deposit up front before they'll even consider handing over the keys to one of their apartments. So even if you're making some decent coin as a professional and you need to live in the city, good luck finding a place you can afford.

To answer that increasingly common problem, communes of a sort -- or what the New York Times calls "dorm living for professionals" -- have begun appearing in town and they're geared toward professionals who aren't pulling down Google or Facebook level salaries:

"Shared bathrooms at the end of the hall and having no individual kitchen or living room is becoming less weird for some of the city’s workers thanks to Starcity, a new development company that is expressly creating dorms for many of the non-tech population. . .

Starcity residents get a bedroom of 130 square feet to 220 square feet. Many of the buildings will feature some units with a private bath for a higher rent. But Jon Dishotsky, Starcity’s co-founder and chief executive, said a ratio of one bathroom for every two to three bedrooms makes the most sense for large-scale affordability. The average one-bedroom apartment in San Francisco rents for $3,300 a month, but Starcity rooms go for $1,400 to $2,400 a month fully furnished, with utilities and Wi-Fi included."

One side of me celebrates this move. It seems like it's a market-based solution to San Francisco's glaring housing problem, one that's increasing in seriousness every year, from all appearances.

The other side of me, however, is saying "This is going to end well." ;-)

"Politics is just show business for ugly people."
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [big kahuna] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
big kahuna wrote:

The other side of me, however, is saying "This is going to end well." ;-)
Did you mean to have a 'not' in there?

What's the endgame for these professionals, what are their goals in staying in SF? So you're a successful professional but you don't pull down the mid-6 figures of the tech giants what are you aspiring toward, because there are only so many of those types of jobs. There are tens of thousands of non-tech professionals in SF, it's not like they can just work hard and get into that mid-6 salary in their industries so why stay?

It has been and will continue to be fascinating watching SF and how they deal with housing and (relative) low- to moderate-income folks.
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [Brownie28] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Brownie28 wrote:
big kahuna wrote:


The other side of me, however, is saying "This is going to end well." ;-)

Did you mean to have a 'not' in there?

What's the endgame for these professionals, what are their goals in staying in SF? So you're a successful professional but you don't pull down the mid-6 figures of the tech giants what are you aspiring toward, because there are only so many of those types of jobs. There are tens of thousands of non-tech professionals in SF, it's not like they can just work hard and get into that mid-6 salary in their industries so why stay?

It has been and will continue to be fascinating watching SF and how they deal with housing and (relative) low- to moderate-income folks.

I wrote for several years about San Francisco real estate. Really, many of these coastal cities suffer with this issue of housing costs to one degree or another, so the subject interests me. That's especially true when it comes to seeing how San Fran and other cities will deal with the problem.

Frisco's also kind of unique when it comes to this phenomenon, in that it has rent control (1979 and older units, I believe) and some serious land-use restrictions and other non-friendly barriers to new housing construction. Plus some NIMBYism, no doubt about it. The ones that are there now aren't so happy to see new arrivals come in and change the 'character' of their city, though there's simply no stopping that.

There's also a burgeoning anti-gentrification movement taking place in many large urban areas, including Los Angeles and San Francisco. Rich white professionals, hipsters and similar types are moving into neighborhoods that were once middle class or lower and transforming them into tony enclaves... something that's beginning to irritate the community organizing folks to no end, apparently. After all, where are those displaced folks supposed to go?

"Politics is just show business for ugly people."
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [big kahuna] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Check out 28 Grand in downtown Detroit.

260 sq ft of urban living bliss. Fully furnished, extensive community amenities, and walking distance from One Campus Martius (Quicken).
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [big kahuna] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Aside from being boxed into not being able to afford a family, the first place my mind goes with this is to the bathrooms -- it was awful enough having a shared bathroom with 3 other guys in my college dorm, guys I became at least friendly with if not actual friends. Even getting group participation in managing bathroom times and clean up was a challenge there, and the college enforced a fairly high level of cleanliness in the dorms. (Side Note: I wish I had their ability to enforce that cleanliness with Mrs. MWR...) I cannot imagine sharing a bathroom with 3 or so complete strangers who are only forced into the communal misery because of the shared experience of not making a high enough salary to get out. Nobody is taking charge of cleaning that thing. And if a cleaner has to be hired...how does a janitorial worker afford that kind of rent?
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [big kahuna] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Except there are actually nice studio and 1 BR places available for much less. And that is just in San Francisco proper.

Apartments.com kind of messes up the narrative. And 2 and 3+ BR are out there too, so you don't have to have anyone sleep in the hallway to make rent.

Having roommates has been a thing for a long time.

I'm beginning to think that we are much more fucked than I thought.
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [efernand] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
efernand wrote:
Check out 28 Grand in downtown Detroit.

260 sq ft of urban living bliss. Fully furnished, extensive community amenities, and walking distance from One Campus Martius (Quicken).

Detroit and Quicken are big on this development, and they can get away with it. Because it's Detroit, after all. ;-)

"Politics is just show business for ugly people."
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [j p o] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
j p o wrote:
Except there are actually nice studio and 1 BR places available for much less. And that is just in San Francisco proper.

Apartments.com kind of messes up the narrative. And 2 and 3+ BR are out there too, so you don't have to have anyone sleep in the hallway to make rent.

Having roommates has been a thing for a long time.

Just quoting from the median rents available online from Curbed and other sites, as well as what many landlords in SFO want to see from tenants. As far as roommates goes, that's all well and good, but what if you don't want or can't live with a roommate, or you have a family? "Familymates" could be the next big trend, though. I think I see a market for that kind of match-up service, in fact... ;-)

"Politics is just show business for ugly people."
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [Brownie28] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Quote:

What's the endgame for these professionals, what are their goals in staying in SF?


Some will stay, some will go. The actual endgame is that many of them will fall in love, usually with another young professional who makes about the same amount. In a few years they will easily pull 200K+. they may stay or go, but they are making a combined income that gives them many choices. the bigger issue is for the longer-term single renter. I know lots of them who who gotten crushed over the passing decades.

(BTW, Converted studio/garages go for $1,800-2000/mo. near Facebook/Palo Alto)
Last edited by: oldandslow: Mar 6, 18 7:29
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [oldandslow] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
oldandslow wrote:
Quote:

What's the endgame for these professionals, what are their goals in staying in SF?


Some will stay, some will go. The actual endgame is that many of them will fall in love, usually with another young professional who makes about the same amount. In a few years they will easily pull 200K+. they may stay or go, but they are making a combined income that gives them many choices. the bigger issue is for the longer-term single renter. I know lots of them who who gotten crushed over the passing decades.

(BTW, Converted studio/garages go for $1,800-2000/mo. near Facebook/Palo Alto)

The last time I was in Palo Alto was in '79. Not nearly as expensive back then as now, I imagine (though it's all relative, admittedly).

"Politics is just show business for ugly people."
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [big kahuna] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
big kahuna wrote:
j p o wrote:
Except there are actually nice studio and 1 BR places available for much less. And that is just in San Francisco proper.

Apartments.com kind of messes up the narrative. And 2 and 3+ BR are out there too, so you don't have to have anyone sleep in the hallway to make rent.

Having roommates has been a thing for a long time.


Just quoting from the median rents available online from Curbed and other sites, as well as what many landlords in SFO want to see from tenants. As far as roommates goes, that's all well and good, but what if you don't want or can't live with a roommate, or you have a family? "Familymates" could be the next big trend, though. I think I see a market for that kind of match-up service, in fact... ;-)

Then maybe you don't get a view of the bridge. :)

I just don't think the situation is as desire as some people act. And I think snobs from those kind of areas like to pretend like every house/apartment is 5k/mth. I get tired of the, 'oh, I can't make ends meet on $200k/yr.' Fucking coastal liberals anyway.

Of course I could quote what my house would be worth in Manhattan, how much does 2.5 acres in Manhattan go for? Even if I put a single wide on it.

I'm beginning to think that we are much more fucked than I thought.
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [j p o] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
j p o wrote:
big kahuna wrote:
j p o wrote:
Except there are actually nice studio and 1 BR places available for much less. And that is just in San Francisco proper.

Apartments.com kind of messes up the narrative. And 2 and 3+ BR are out there too, so you don't have to have anyone sleep in the hallway to make rent.

Having roommates has been a thing for a long time.


Just quoting from the median rents available online from Curbed and other sites, as well as what many landlords in SFO want to see from tenants. As far as roommates goes, that's all well and good, but what if you don't want or can't live with a roommate, or you have a family? "Familymates" could be the next big trend, though. I think I see a market for that kind of match-up service, in fact... ;-)


Then maybe you don't get a view of the bridge. :)

I just don't think the situation is as desire as some people act. And I think snobs from those kind of areas like to pretend like every house/apartment is 5k/mth. I get tired of the, 'oh, I can't make ends meet on $200k/yr.' Fucking coastal liberals anyway.

Of course I could quote what my house would be worth in Manhattan, how much does 2.5 acres in Manhattan go for? Even if I put a single wide on it.

Two-and-a-half acres in Manhattan? Manhattan, NY or Manhattan, Kansas? I can't even conceive of how much 2.5 acres in NYC's Manhattan would fetch. Probably enough to buy the Los Angeles Lakers or the Dallas Cowboys. ;-)

"Politics is just show business for ugly people."
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [big kahuna] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
What role (if any) does foreign investment play in this market?

As a landlord or homeowner I’m sure they love foreign investment. As tenants or struggling homebuyers, foreign ownership of residential property sucks.
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [mv2005] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
mv2005 wrote:
What role (if any) does foreign investment play in this market?

As a landlord or homeowner I’m sure they love foreign investment. As tenants or struggling homebuyers, foreign ownership of residential property sucks.

The character of SFO housing, as far as I remember, used to be a lot of individuals renting to other individuals, but I'm sure foreign investment is buying up more and more of these places and packaging them for subsequent rentals as a longer-term investment. Mr. Oldandslow probably has more of a handle on SFO than I do, that's for sure. He's one of those bug-eyed San Francisco lunatic liberals. ;-) ;-)

"Politics is just show business for ugly people."
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [big kahuna] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
big kahuna wrote:

Two-and-a-half acres in Manhattan? Manhattan, NY or Manhattan, Kansas? I can't even conceive of how much 2.5 acres in NYC's Manhattan would fetch. Probably enough to buy the Los Angeles Lakers or the Dallas Cowboys. ;-)

Careful, soldier. I have fond memories of the Little Apple.

If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went. - Will Rogers

Emery's Third Coast Triathlon | Tri Wisconsin Triathlon Team | Push Endurance | GLWR
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [big kahuna] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I can't imagine why anybody would want to live in a place where you're accommodation poor on $200,000 a year with no hope of purchasing a house unless you're willing to commute 2 or 3 hrs each way. Find a little town out in bumfuk, nowhere and you can purchase a nice house on a third of your salary.

I've talked about this with my daughter. She lives in Vancouver and has zero possibility of purchasing a house on her salary. I've told her if she'd move to my neck of the woods I could help her with a down payment and she'd be able to easily carry a mortgage on half the salary she is making now. Makes all the sense in the world to leave Vancouver but she won't because she tells me she "loves Vancouver too much". And then she asks me where would she meet a guy in the boonies. 33 yrs old and still single. Not like meeting the right guy has been working out in Vancouver after being there for ten years. Kids:-(
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [cerveloguy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Couple things at play here around the desire to live and work in the big metro areas:
1. Big city appeal; the sports, the arts, the restaurants, you stumble out of your apartment and have a million things and people you can see and meet. When you're young, single, wanting to experience new things and meet new people that's a huge draw...hell, it's a huge draw for a lot of older people, too.
2. Job opportunities and the chance to hit it big. Can you find a decent job and live comfortably in the middle of nowhere? Sure you can...but how much career advancement is there, really? In the cities you spend a decade working your ass off, networking, moving up and then if you're lucky you might just be able to afford to live in/around your favorite city even when you settle down and have kids. Or maybe you REALLY make it and can retire early and live a comfortable life...there's almost a zero-point-zero percent chance that happens if you live in a small town

Now that's your average big city 'cost/benefit analysis'. For SF I think the calculus is different, it's just such a different beast from everywhere else imo and I can't imagine, unless you're in tech, having any desire to deal with it. Every big city in the country has varying levels of industry that'd support most professionals, if you're not trying to hit it big with software why would you ever want to live in SF?
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [big kahuna] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Quote:
The character of SFO housing, as far as I remember, used to be a lot of individuals renting to other individuals, but I'm sure foreign investment is buying up more and more of these places and packaging them for subsequent rentals as a longer-term investment. Mr. Oldandslow probably has more of a handle on SFO than I do, that's for sure. He's one of those bug-eyed San Francisco lunatic liberals. ;-) ;-)

Well, I'm much more Silicon Valley lunatic (less bug-eyed). There is no one single story. There are inherited family homes, and old folks two have 2-3 properties, and 90-year old geezers who bought in the 70's; and perfectly nice couples who have wealthy parents, and Google millionaires, and professional DINKS, and a bunch of guys stuffed in a single home and some recent foreign investors. There are also a bunch of relatively cheaper alternatives, depending on location. Folks tend to pick the single story that suits what they want to believe.
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [j p o] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
j p o wrote:
big kahuna wrote:
j p o wrote:
Except there are actually nice studio and 1 BR places available for much less. And that is just in San Francisco proper.

Apartments.com kind of messes up the narrative. And 2 and 3+ BR are out there too, so you don't have to have anyone sleep in the hallway to make rent.

Having roommates has been a thing for a long time.


Just quoting from the median rents available online from Curbed and other sites, as well as what many landlords in SFO want to see from tenants. As far as roommates goes, that's all well and good, but what if you don't want or can't live with a roommate, or you have a family? "Familymates" could be the next big trend, though. I think I see a market for that kind of match-up service, in fact... ;-)


Then maybe you don't get a view of the bridge. :)

I just don't think the situation is as desire as some people act. And I think snobs from those kind of areas like to pretend like every house/apartment is 5k/mth. I get tired of the, 'oh, I can't make ends meet on $200k/yr.' Fucking coastal liberals anyway.

Of course I could quote what my house would be worth in Manhattan, how much does 2.5 acres in Manhattan go for? Even if I put a single wide on it.

Manhattan and Bay Area aren't comparable because Manhattan is dense, the Bay area is not. You really can't build your way to more affordable housing in Manhattan like you could in the Bay Area.
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [efernand] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Seriously a $1000 for Downtown Detroit for 270 sq feet.
I grew up there 0 to 9.
I visit for funerals only as an adult. So I know Detroit.
I am a house poor sales profession, living in a Beach Community of Los Angeles, 3/4 of mile from the beach and a major Tech Hub (Google / Belkin/ YouTube/ etc).
Rents for a low end 1 bedroom 750 sq ft have gone from $1400 2008 to about $2000 today in my neighborhood.
My thoughts, that is ridiculously expensive. Especially since there is little recreation in the area (Belle Isle really?),
I will give Greek town a pass and the stadiums for night life.
Not to mention it is COLD AF during the winter, with no real skiing (Pine Knob does not count).

Pete

2017 Cervelo P2
2017 Cervelo S2
itraininla.com
#itraininla
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [big kahuna] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
It's taking off all over the country. Now you can WeLive where you WeWork. What could go wrong?

https://www.welive.com/
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [JSA] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
JSA wrote:
big kahuna wrote:


Two-and-a-half acres in Manhattan? Manhattan, NY or Manhattan, Kansas? I can't even conceive of how much 2.5 acres in NYC's Manhattan would fetch. Probably enough to buy the Los Angeles Lakers or the Dallas Cowboys. ;-)


Careful, soldier. I have fond memories of the Little Apple.

Fort Riley. 'Nuff said. ;-)

"Politics is just show business for ugly people."
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [cerveloguy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
cerveloguy wrote:
I can't imagine why anybody would want to live in a place where you're accommodation poor on $200,000 a year with no hope of purchasing a house unless you're willing to commute 2 or 3 hrs each way. Find a little town out in bumfuk, nowhere and you can purchase a nice house on a third of your salary.

I've talked about this with my daughter. She lives in Vancouver and has zero possibility of purchasing a house on her salary. I've told her if she'd move to my neck of the woods I could help her with a down payment and she'd be able to easily carry a mortgage on half the salary she is making now. Makes all the sense in the world to leave Vancouver but she won't because she tells me she "loves Vancouver too much". And then she asks me where would she meet a guy in the boonies. 33 yrs old and still single. Not like meeting the right guy has been working out in Vancouver after being there for ten years. Kids:-(

Is she hot? Does she like fine rum & Cuban cigars?
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [axlsix3] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
axlsix3 wrote:
cerveloguy wrote:
I can't imagine why anybody would want to live in a place where you're accommodation poor on $200,000 a year with no hope of purchasing a house unless you're willing to commute 2 or 3 hrs each way. Find a little town out in bumfuk, nowhere and you can purchase a nice house on a third of your salary.

I've talked about this with my daughter. She lives in Vancouver and has zero possibility of purchasing a house on her salary. I've told her if she'd move to my neck of the woods I could help her with a down payment and she'd be able to easily carry a mortgage on half the salary she is making now. Makes all the sense in the world to leave Vancouver but she won't because she tells me she "loves Vancouver too much". And then she asks me where would she meet a guy in the boonies. 33 yrs old and still single. Not like meeting the right guy has been working out in Vancouver after being there for ten years. Kids:-(


Is she hot? Does she like fine rum & Cuban cigars?

Way too hot and classy for you pal.
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [cerveloguy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
cerveloguy wrote:
axlsix3 wrote:
cerveloguy wrote:
I can't imagine why anybody would want to live in a place where you're accommodation poor on $200,000 a year with no hope of purchasing a house unless you're willing to commute 2 or 3 hrs each way. Find a little town out in bumfuk, nowhere and you can purchase a nice house on a third of your salary.

I've talked about this with my daughter. She lives in Vancouver and has zero possibility of purchasing a house on her salary. I've told her if she'd move to my neck of the woods I could help her with a down payment and she'd be able to easily carry a mortgage on half the salary she is making now. Makes all the sense in the world to leave Vancouver but she won't because she tells me she "loves Vancouver too much". And then she asks me where would she meet a guy in the boonies. 33 yrs old and still single. Not like meeting the right guy has been working out in Vancouver after being there for ten years. Kids:-(


Is she hot? Does she like fine rum & Cuban cigars?


Way too hot and classy for you pal.


Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [cerveloguy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
cerveloguy wrote:
I can't imagine why anybody would want to live in a place where you're accommodation poor on $200,000 a year with no hope of purchasing a house unless you're willing to commute 2 or 3 hrs each way. Find a little town out in bumfuk, nowhere and you can purchase a nice house on a third of your salary.

I've talked about this with my daughter. She lives in Vancouver and has zero possibility of purchasing a house on her salary. I've told her if she'd move to my neck of the woods I could help her with a down payment and she'd be able to easily carry a mortgage on half the salary she is making now. Makes all the sense in the world to leave Vancouver but she won't because she tells me she "loves Vancouver too much". And then she asks me where would she meet a guy in the boonies. 33 yrs old and still single. Not like meeting the right guy has been working out in Vancouver after being there for ten years. Kids:-(

Same here. My daughter is 31 and lives in Seattle. She and the guy I think she is going to marry both make good coin. Both realize there is zero chance they can afford to ever buy a house in Seattle. They could be making similar money a lot of other places and have a nice place. They don't even have to live in the boonies to do so, just someplace more reasonable. But, she says she loves Seattle too much. The boyfriend, not so much, but he loves my daughter, so, he's screwed.

Now, my son, on the other hand, has finally come around. 30 years old, just got married, lives in Henderson, NV. He and wifie finally got the "adventure" out of their systems and are ready to start a family. So, they are moving back here where they can afford to do so.

If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went. - Will Rogers

Emery's Third Coast Triathlon | Tri Wisconsin Triathlon Team | Push Endurance | GLWR
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [JSA] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
JSA wrote:
cerveloguy wrote:
I can't imagine why anybody would want to live in a place where you're accommodation poor on $200,000 a year with no hope of purchasing a house unless you're willing to commute 2 or 3 hrs each way. Find a little town out in bumfuk, nowhere and you can purchase a nice house on a third of your salary.

I've talked about this with my daughter. She lives in Vancouver and has zero possibility of purchasing a house on her salary. I've told her if she'd move to my neck of the woods I could help her with a down payment and she'd be able to easily carry a mortgage on half the salary she is making now. Makes all the sense in the world to leave Vancouver but she won't because she tells me she "loves Vancouver too much". And then she asks me where would she meet a guy in the boonies. 33 yrs old and still single. Not like meeting the right guy has been working out in Vancouver after being there for ten years. Kids:-(


Same here. My daughter is 31 and lives in Seattle. She and the guy I think she is going to marry both make good coin. Both realize there is zero chance they can afford to ever buy a house in Seattle. They could be making similar money a lot of other places and have a nice place. They don't even have to live in the boonies to do so, just someplace more reasonable. But, she says she loves Seattle too much. The boyfriend, not so much, but he loves my daughter, so, he's screwed.

Now, my son, on the other hand, has finally come around. 30 years old, just got married, lives in Henderson, NV. He and wifie finally got the "adventure" out of their systems and are ready to start a family. So, they are moving back here where they can afford to do so.

That Aesop guy knew what he was talking about. ;-)

The City Mouse and the Country Mouse

"Politics is just show business for ugly people."
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [JSA] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Think about living in Mountain View (Google headquarters) where you need to be making at least $300K a year to buy a three bedroom house on a 6,000 square foot lot.
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [jimatbeyond] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
jimatbeyond wrote:
Think about living in Mountain View (Google headquarters) where you need to be making at least $300K a year to buy a three bedroom house on a 6,000 square foot lot.

That's just stupid. Not the three-bedroom house, but the price for one of them. We live in a condo (because we don't want to cut grass or do exterior maintenance), but most of my family and friends that live in houses and not apartments or condos have backyards much bigger than 6,000 square feet. Talk about an overheated real estate market...

Man, I was stationed for a time up in the Bay Area and other parts of Northern California (and Southern; it's like two different states). I liked SFO and everything around it. Great lifestyle, at least back when I was there (and the last time I was in the Napa Valley was for the '98 Vineman half-Iron tri). But is it worth having to try to make more money than many specialty physicians make in a year just to live up there? I'm not so sure.

I tell you: that tar paper shack in the wilds of Montana is looking better and better with each passing year. ;-)

"Politics is just show business for ugly people."
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [JSA] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
JSA wrote:
cerveloguy wrote:
I can't imagine why anybody would want to live in a place where you're accommodation poor on $200,000 a year with no hope of purchasing a house unless you're willing to commute 2 or 3 hrs each way. Find a little town out in bumfuk, nowhere and you can purchase a nice house on a third of your salary.

I've talked about this with my daughter. She lives in Vancouver and has zero possibility of purchasing a house on her salary. I've told her if she'd move to my neck of the woods I could help her with a down payment and she'd be able to easily carry a mortgage on half the salary she is making now. Makes all the sense in the world to leave Vancouver but she won't because she tells me she "loves Vancouver too much". And then she asks me where would she meet a guy in the boonies. 33 yrs old and still single. Not like meeting the right guy has been working out in Vancouver after being there for ten years. Kids:-(


Same here. My daughter is 31 and lives in Seattle. She and the guy I think she is going to marry both make good coin. Both realize there is zero chance they can afford to ever buy a house in Seattle. They could be making similar money a lot of other places and have a nice place. They don't even have to live in the boonies to do so, just someplace more reasonable. But, she says she loves Seattle too much. The boyfriend, not so much, but he loves my daughter, so, he's screwed.

Now, my son, on the other hand, has finally come around. 30 years old, just got married, lives in Henderson, NV. He and wifie finally got the "adventure" out of their systems and are ready to start a family. So, they are moving back here where they can afford to do so.

Sorry, I would live in a tent in Seattle before I moved to Henderson.

Don't get me wrong. I live in Columbus for a reason. But places like Seattle, SF, Vancouver, etc. have definite advantages even over Edens like Columbus. There is a reason so many people want to live there.

You just have to make tradeoffs on how big your house is if you live there. They don't get an affordable 3000+ sf house on a large lot, we don't get mountains, oceans, or beaches.

I'm beginning to think that we are much more fucked than I thought.
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [j p o] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
j p o wrote:
Don't get me wrong. I live in Columbus for a reason. But places like Seattle, SF, Vancouver, etc. have definite advantages even over Edens like Columbus. There is a reason so many people want to live there.

You just have to make tradeoffs on how big your house is if you live there. They don't get an affordable 3000+ sf house on a large lot, we don't get mountains, oceans, or beaches.

Understood. But, I do not think a lot of these younger folks really can afford to even live there. I'll use my kids as examples - 30 and 31 years old. They cannot afford to own a home, so they are not creating any equity. The cost of living is draining nearly all their income, so they are not investing or doing much, if anything, for retirement. Now, granted, they are paying their bills and have a roof over their heads. But, they are talking family, kids, not working forever, etc. That isn't going to happen at this pace.

If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went. - Will Rogers

Emery's Third Coast Triathlon | Tri Wisconsin Triathlon Team | Push Endurance | GLWR
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [big kahuna] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Its unreal.

A few years ago I got a linkedIn request from a recruiter from Google. I don't want to move to San Fran, especially not being a tech person (this was back office job), I took phone interview because, well how often do you get someone like google to seek you out and ask to interview you!! Pretty much ended when I said no to moving to their HQ office. I would be poor on a back office salary.
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [JSA] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
All of these posts point to two things, an inability to understand about how things work, and a huge lack of imagination on the part of most of the LR.
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [oldandslow] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
oldandslow wrote:
All of these posts point to two things, an inability to understand about how things work, and a huge lack of imagination on the part of most of the LR.

I don't understand your response. Please explain.

If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went. - Will Rogers

Emery's Third Coast Triathlon | Tri Wisconsin Triathlon Team | Push Endurance | GLWR
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [JSA] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Repeatedly folks here don't seem to understand why folks come to the Bay Area or why they stay. These type of bias has been going on for literally decades, yet young folks seem to ignore it and do just fine. "Makes all the sense in the world to leave " "my son, on the other hand, has finally come around". There are certainly reasons to live in a more affordable are AND different reasons to live in more expensive areas.
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [oldandslow] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Do these young people often stay? Or do you have high turnover? I get what your saying, but how is it turning out after a few decades?

Young and single or even a married DINK, yeah I think bay area would be fun and an experience. I would have done it for a while, but now that I have kids and realize I need to save for retirement, no way!

The article attached says 66% of millennials have no retirement savings. I think that is a high number, but even if it was 10-20% overstated that is a high number. Article states its due to student loans and rent/mortgage.

http://money.cnn.com/2018/03/07/retirement/millennial-retirement-savings/index.html
Last edited by: AndysStrongAle: Mar 7, 18 9:12
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [oldandslow] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
oldandslow wrote:
Repeatedly folks here don't seem to understand why folks come to the Bay Area or why they stay. These type of bias has been going on for literally decades, yet young folks seem to ignore it and do just fine. "Makes all the sense in the world to leave " "my son, on the other hand, has finally come around". There are certainly reasons to live in a more affordable are AND different reasons to live in more expensive areas.

I wasn't making any reference to the Bay Area. I merely commented on the situations involving my daughter in Seattle and my son in Henderson.

I cannot speak for others, but, it is not "bias" on my part, in a negative sense. If someone wants to rent forever and consume their entire paycheck on living expenses for the location, more power to them. What I don't understand is expressing the desire to own a home, raise a family, and retire at 65 while continuing to live in a place that does not permit any of that. Again, I am only speaking as it pertains to my two kids.

My son has "finally come around," in the sense that he recognizes he and his wife cannot do these things in Henderson. Perhaps many others can, but, he cannot. Plus, he really likes Milwaukee - go figure.

Look, I still live in the "starter home" wifie and I bought 15 years ago. My associates have bigger and more expensive houses than mine. So, my mentality as it pertains to living expenses is quite different than that of many others.

If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went. - Will Rogers

Emery's Third Coast Triathlon | Tri Wisconsin Triathlon Team | Push Endurance | GLWR
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [AndysStrongAle] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
AndysStrongAle wrote:
Do these young people often stay? Or do you have high turnover? I get what your saying, but how is it turning out after a few decades?

Young and single or even a married DINK, yeah I think bay area would be fun and an experience. I would have done it for a while, but now that I have kids and realize I need to save for retirement, no way!

The article attached says 66% of millennials have no retirement savings. I think that is a high number, but even if it was 10-20% overstated that is a high number. Article states its due to student loans and rent/mortgage.

http://money.cnn.com/...t-savings/index.html


I think it is spot on. I also believe, if that was changed to "adequate retirement savings," that number would rise to 90%.

If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went. - Will Rogers

Emery's Third Coast Triathlon | Tri Wisconsin Triathlon Team | Push Endurance | GLWR
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [JSA] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
JSA wrote:
AndysStrongAle wrote:
Do these young people often stay? Or do you have high turnover? I get what your saying, but how is it turning out after a few decades?

Young and single or even a married DINK, yeah I think bay area would be fun and an experience. I would have done it for a while, but now that I have kids and realize I need to save for retirement, no way!

The article attached says 66% of millennials have no retirement savings. I think that is a high number, but even if it was 10-20% overstated that is a high number. Article states its due to student loans and rent/mortgage.

http://money.cnn.com/...t-savings/index.html



I think it is spot on. I also believe, if that was changed to "adequate retirement savings," that number would rise to 90%.

What I see in my little world are the young people move into Toronto (insert any large city) after University to work, party and have fun. once they meet someone and decide they want more out of life,they leave and settle down somewhere outside that city.
I don't know too many older folks nowadays that move to the big city to retire.
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [JSA] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
JSA wrote:
AndysStrongAle wrote:
Do these young people often stay? Or do you have high turnover? I get what your saying, but how is it turning out after a few decades?

Young and single or even a married DINK, yeah I think bay area would be fun and an experience. I would have done it for a while, but now that I have kids and realize I need to save for retirement, no way!

The article attached says 66% of millennials have no retirement savings. I think that is a high number, but even if it was 10-20% overstated that is a high number. Article states its due to student loans and rent/mortgage.

http://money.cnn.com/...t-savings/index.html



I think it is spot on. I also believe, if that was changed to "adequate retirement savings," that number would rise to 90%.

It doesn't bother me that millennials haven't saved anything. People in their 20's have never been high on saving for retirement.

The scarier thing is the number of people overall with little or not savings. This article claims 56% with less than $10k, http://time.com/...ment-savings-survey/

There are a lot of different scenarios and different people will need different amounts. But $10k only works if you plan to die before 62 and you are using that money to get buried.

Me, I've run the numbers and if I retire right now I could live comfortably for the next 11 minutes.

I'm beginning to think that we are much more fucked than I thought.
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [M~] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
M~ wrote:
What I see in my little world are the young people move into Toronto (insert any large city) after University to work, party and have fun. once they meet someone and decide they want more out of life,they leave and settle down somewhere outside that city.
I don't know too many older folks nowadays that move to the big city to retire.

That was my impression, until recently. What is interesting is that this is becoming "a thing" here in Milwaukee (and elsewhere). High end apartments and condos are going up downtown, especially around the new Milwaukee Bucks arena. They are catering more to empty nesters and retirees than to young urban types. Wifie is even talking about it, now that we are empty nesters (but far from retirement).

Wifie and I went to Nashville for a Packers game a year ago. We met a newly retired couple who moved from their huge rural house to a smaller condo downtown, within walking distance of the NHL arena. They retired, moved to the city, bought season tix, and go to all the games. They have a few friends doing the same. Not sure I would want to do this, but I can see part of the appeal.

If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went. - Will Rogers

Emery's Third Coast Triathlon | Tri Wisconsin Triathlon Team | Push Endurance | GLWR
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [j p o] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
j p o wrote:
JSA wrote:
AndysStrongAle wrote:
Do these young people often stay? Or do you have high turnover? I get what your saying, but how is it turning out after a few decades?

Young and single or even a married DINK, yeah I think bay area would be fun and an experience. I would have done it for a while, but now that I have kids and realize I need to save for retirement, no way!

The article attached says 66% of millennials have no retirement savings. I think that is a high number, but even if it was 10-20% overstated that is a high number. Article states its due to student loans and rent/mortgage.

http://money.cnn.com/...t-savings/index.html



I think it is spot on. I also believe, if that was changed to "adequate retirement savings," that number would rise to 90%.


It doesn't bother me that millennials haven't saved anything. People in their 20's have never been high on saving for retirement.

Agreed. But, this is spilling into people in their 30s.

j p o wrote:
The scarier thing is the number of people overall with little or not savings. This article claims 56% with less than $10k, http://time.com/...ment-savings-survey/

There are a lot of different scenarios and different people will need different amounts. But $10k only works if you plan to die before 62 and you are using that money to get buried.

Agreed. But, these millenials are not at all forward thinking. Very few have any plans to buy a house at any point in the remote future. Many are absolutely drowning in student loans. It is a different situation.

j p o wrote:
Me, I've run the numbers and if I retire right now I could live comfortably for the next 11 minutes.

No shit. I completed an online retirement calculator a couple weeks ago and nearly had a panic attack. Fortunately, I do not plan on retiring anytime soon.

If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went. - Will Rogers

Emery's Third Coast Triathlon | Tri Wisconsin Triathlon Team | Push Endurance | GLWR
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [JSA] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
JSA wrote:
M~ wrote:

What I see in my little world are the young people move into Toronto (insert any large city) after University to work, party and have fun. once they meet someone and decide they want more out of life,they leave and settle down somewhere outside that city.
I don't know too many older folks nowadays that move to the big city to retire.


That was my impression, until recently. What is interesting is that this is becoming "a thing" here in Milwaukee (and elsewhere). High end apartments and condos are going up downtown, especially around the new Milwaukee Bucks arena. They are catering more to empty nesters and retirees than to young urban types. Wifie is even talking about it, now that we are empty nesters (but far from retirement).

Wifie and I went to Nashville for a Packers game a year ago. We met a newly retired couple who moved from their huge rural house to a smaller condo downtown, within walking distance of the NHL arena. They retired, moved to the city, bought season tix, and go to all the games. They have a few friends doing the same. Not sure I would want to do this, but I can see part of the appeal.

I see that here too. Our neighbours, empty nesters, and can sell their house for a cool 2 million easy (its paid off). Husband wants to move to high rise condo downtown and not worry about house chores. Same thing with a co-worker and wife who are recently empty nesters. They are thinking of selling house in the burbs and moving into a downtown condo.
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [AndysStrongAle] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Quote:
Do these young people often stay? Or do you have high turnover? I get what your saying, but how is it turning out after a few decades?
Some stay, some don't. The turnover is high, but lots of folks remain. It has been turning out extremely well for (usually two-income) families who have purchased. Of course, it is always going to turn out well after a few decades if you purchase a property that rises >6% annually. New buyers are funded by family wealth and /or high incomes and/or stock options and/or appreciated housing that gets rolled over. OTOH, I know some long-time renters (usually single) who never bought, and they are moving out to populate cheaper areas with their evil "blue" ideas ;).

Quote:
The article attached says 66% of millennials have no retirement savings. I think that is a high number, but even if it was 10-20% overstated that is a high number. Article states its due to student loans and rent/mortgage.

34% of millennials have retirement savings??? That is surprisingly good and I am not being facetious, I didn't have savings at that age, and student loans have been burying a good percentage of kids recently.
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [JSA] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I probably live in my own little world as I have never worked/lived in a HCOL area with the exception of growing up. I'm a millennial (low 30's) but my wife and I are very much savers and I can tell you we are probably in your 10% adequate retirement savings.

But like you stated, student loans is a killer to most people. Rent probably comes in a close second.
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [Uncle Arqyle] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Uncle Arqyle wrote:
JSA wrote:
M~ wrote:

What I see in my little world are the young people move into Toronto (insert any large city) after University to work, party and have fun. once they meet someone and decide they want more out of life,they leave and settle down somewhere outside that city.
I don't know too many older folks nowadays that move to the big city to retire.


That was my impression, until recently. What is interesting is that this is becoming "a thing" here in Milwaukee (and elsewhere). High end apartments and condos are going up downtown, especially around the new Milwaukee Bucks arena. They are catering more to empty nesters and retirees than to young urban types. Wifie is even talking about it, now that we are empty nesters (but far from retirement).

Wifie and I went to Nashville for a Packers game a year ago. We met a newly retired couple who moved from their huge rural house to a smaller condo downtown, within walking distance of the NHL arena. They retired, moved to the city, bought season tix, and go to all the games. They have a few friends doing the same. Not sure I would want to do this, but I can see part of the appeal.


I see that here too. Our neighbours, empty nesters, and can sell their house for a cool 2 million easy (its paid off). Husband wants to move to high rise condo downtown and not worry about house chores. Same thing with a co-worker and wife who are recently empty nesters. They are thinking of selling house in the burbs and moving into a downtown condo.

Interesting. When my wife and I were between houses, we had to rent a friends condo while the house was being finished. That was the most miserable 3 months ever. TONNES of rules, too many people and the elevators drove me crazy. I guess you can get use to anything but it was a real pain in the ass. The final straw was when they told me I couldn't bring my bike into the condo and had to leave it in the parking garage in the POS bike rack. Yeah, that was going to happen. But I guess old people like rules.
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [M~] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I bought a condo when I first moved here after the Army. I'm with you - I don't want to ever do it again for the reasons you stated.

If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went. - Will Rogers

Emery's Third Coast Triathlon | Tri Wisconsin Triathlon Team | Push Endurance | GLWR
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [JSA] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Quote:
No shit. I completed an online retirement calculator a couple weeks ago and nearly had a panic attack.

Those online retirement calculators are complete bullshit.
Quote Reply
Re: San Francisco's Dormitories for Not-Rich-Enough Professionals [M~] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
M~ wrote:
Uncle Arqyle wrote:
JSA wrote:
M~ wrote:

What I see in my little world are the young people move into Toronto (insert any large city) after University to work, party and have fun. once they meet someone and decide they want more out of life,they leave and settle down somewhere outside that city.
I don't know too many older folks nowadays that move to the big city to retire.


That was my impression, until recently. What is interesting is that this is becoming "a thing" here in Milwaukee (and elsewhere). High end apartments and condos are going up downtown, especially around the new Milwaukee Bucks arena. They are catering more to empty nesters and retirees than to young urban types. Wifie is even talking about it, now that we are empty nesters (but far from retirement).

Wifie and I went to Nashville for a Packers game a year ago. We met a newly retired couple who moved from their huge rural house to a smaller condo downtown, within walking distance of the NHL arena. They retired, moved to the city, bought season tix, and go to all the games. They have a few friends doing the same. Not sure I would want to do this, but I can see part of the appeal.


I see that here too. Our neighbours, empty nesters, and can sell their house for a cool 2 million easy (its paid off). Husband wants to move to high rise condo downtown and not worry about house chores. Same thing with a co-worker and wife who are recently empty nesters. They are thinking of selling house in the burbs and moving into a downtown condo.


Interesting. When my wife and I were between houses, we had to rent a friends condo while the house was being finished. That was the most miserable 3 months ever. TONNES of rules, too many people and the elevators drove me crazy. I guess you can get use to anything but it was a real pain in the ass. The final straw was when they told me I couldn't bring my bike into the condo and had to leave it in the parking garage in the POS bike rack. Yeah, that was going to happen. But I guess old people like rules.

I guess it depends on where you live. We rented a condo when we were between houses. I never considered bringing my bike to the condo because we had a storage unit in the garage. I don't recall any crazy rules but had access to an indoor pool, our unit was above a Westin hotel so we could order room service, go down to the bar and bring cocktails to our room and other sorts of amenities.
Quote Reply