Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Race Security Overreaction?
Quote | Reply
I'm doing a large, well-known tri this weekend.

Just received an email from the RD with new security precautions that we apparently have to follow. We apparently will be given two numbered clear plastic bags that we are supposed to use for all of our transition gear. All bags are numbered for each athlete, and we are specifically asked NOT to bring any other type of bags (ie backpacks/transition bags), and everything we do bring will be searched by the PD prior to allowing us to enter transition on race morning.

Am I alone in thinking this bit of "security theater" is a bit much of an overreaction to the events in Boston?

--
I ride Felt.
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [coredump] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [coredump] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Total over-reaction but I can't say I am surprised at all.I wonder if it was the decision of the organizers or the local authorities..

---
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [coredump] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
with the benefit of hindsight do you think anyone from Boston would consider this 'security theater'?

personally I don't think such an action would occur in transition but just outside where the crowds are watching bike mount and dismount, that tends to be where crowds and VIP tents are.
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [shep] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
shep wrote:
with the benefit of hindsight do you think anyone from Boston would consider this 'security theater'?.

Yes, every rational person would think it was silly.
There aren't a lot of them, but there are some.



Kat Hunter reports on the San Dimas Stage Race from inside the GC winning team
Aeroweenie.com -Compendium of Aero Data and Knowledge
Freelance sports & outdoors writer Kathryn Hunter
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [coredump] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
you are not alone, but.... seems like it's a way to cut down on the crap in transition. Not unlike some WTC races where you can't have things on your bike and have to use transition bags. Plus it might be easier to see what bag is yours if you can see in them. Think of it as a blessing in disguise.
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [coredump] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I saw lots big black backpacks at ITU last weekend and no transition bags were checked as far as I know, more than a few high profile people at that race.
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [coredump] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
We had a moment of silence before my triathlon on Saturday in honor of Boston.

I'd be willing to give up a few minutes for a bag check to avoid random danger...


-----------------------------------------------------------------
You. You make me stronger.
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [shep] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
shep wrote:
with the benefit of hindsight do you think anyone from Boston would consider this 'security theater'?


When you say "anyone from Boston" it seems you are implying there was some sort of manly reaction - you know, like what you would see in some countries where they spray the blood off the street and open for business again the next day like nothing happened. What I saw was a little scared girl who jumps up on a chair when she sees a mouse and swats it with a broom. Except she was on the chair swatting for several days.
Last edited by: endofempire: Apr 22, 13 22:48
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [Agilecipher] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Agilecipher wrote:
I'd be willing to give up a few minutes for a bag check to avoid random danger...

So you're willing to do worthless acts of worthlessness to not prevent anything... what idiot would put a bomb in a bag that was going to be checked?

You can check all the bags, make them clear, you can run bomb sniffing dogs before the race, but no matter what you do it doesn't prevent someone who wants to set off a bomb from setting one off in an open area. You can't make an open field/open race course secure, well you can but I don't think anyone wants to pay the cost of that race. How many races happen a year, between all the running races all the tris and everything else. 20k+?? and this has been going on for how many years with not one incident? Out of all these races for all these years we've had one bombing, yet now for some reason people feel unsafe going to a race. I don't get it.
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [endofempire] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
endofempire wrote:
shep wrote:
with the benefit of hindsight do you think anyone from Boston would consider this 'security theater'?


When you say "anyone from Boston" it seems you are implying there was some sort of manly reaction - you know, like what you would see in some countries where they spray the blood off the street and open for business again the next day like nothing happened. What I saw was a little scared girl who jumps up on a chair when she sees a mouse and swats it with a broom. Except she was on the chair swatting for several days.

no no, was trying to say that anyone in Boston at that particular time would probably have been very glad to jump through whatever hoops were necessary to increase safety of all concerned...in hindsight. Nothing about any manly reaction.
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [Grant.Reuter] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I remember living in Tampa about 8 years ago, and they were adding pat downs when you entered the Bucs NFL games. What struck me as so odd was that people were actually really hell bent against the act. I kinda just shrugged and thought it was with the times that we live in. I just thought it was interesting how pissed off that people were getting about it and how they were going to lengths of trying to make it out like their "rights" were being violated. This reminds me of that.

------------------
@brooksdoughtie
USAT-L2,Y&J; USAC-L2
http://www.aomultisport.com
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [BDoughtie] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I am all for this. This may keep all the excess stuff in transition. Also may limit the people in the transition who should not be in there.

Jeremy
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [coredump] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Am I alone in thinking this bit of "security theater" is a bit much of an overreaction to the events in Boston?


I gather you are not American :)


Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [coredump] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
You are not alone. I think it is a large overreaction to a virtually nonexistent threat. As someone already pointed out, if there's going to be a problem, it would most likely come from the spectator side, and there is just not a plausible way to control that. And yes, I am American (some later post suggested the OP must not be) and I had friends at Boston.
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [coredump] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Yesterday a woman at work asked me if I was running the NYC marathon this year. I looked at her weirdly at first (because I've never run an open marathon) and then asked if she meant the one in November. She said "sure, if that's when it is" so I said no because I'll be in Florida for IMFL. She then asked if I was scared to race because they are so dangerous now. I decided to tell her that getting in my car and driving home was also dangerous. So is riding my bike on the side of the road with distracted drivers going by. There is nothing we can do and to eliminate risks in life. Knee jerk reactions to give people a false sense of security are not the answer.

George Carlin had a funny bit about airport security that sort of relates. Check it out:

The point is we incur risk in so many things we do. Using clear bags instead of regular ones isn't a major change or a big deal (and I agree with the poster about maybe it keep transition less cluttered) but it is doing zero to prevent anything from happening at a race. The way communities came together after Boston and have in so many other tragedies makes me believe that most people are inherently good. We have to trust in that and know that on an open course like our races, there is no complete safety net, but the risk is also extremely minuscule. You're more likely to get blown off your bike in strong wind or slide out on wet roads.

_____________________________________________________
Instagram | Team Kiwami North America
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [Sbradley11] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply

Quote:
riding my bike on the side of the road with distracted drivers

Your statement is right on. As a 41yo healthy suburban male if I ranked my risks for serious injury:
  1. cycling in training
  2. driving
  3. running in training
  4. undiagnosed health conditions
  5. home accidents


Cycling - concerns me because I have been hit before and I have "near misses" each time I cycle. Driving - I have been doing for so long that I take it for granted, but occasionally during poor road conditions or during expressway traffic driving I am more concerned. The other 3 don't worry me at all.

I got the same over-reaction from people who know I do marys. It is similar reaction when they read about somebody having a clincher during a marathon or drowning during a triathlon.


Swim - Bike - Run the rest is just clothing changes.
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [coredump] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Yes and no! All it takes is 1 crazy triathlete to blow him self up in T1 then you will say i wish they had better security.

-------------------------------------------------
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [temoniprince] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
temoniprince wrote:
Yes and no! All it takes is 1 crazy triathlete to blow him self up in T1 then you will say i wish they had better security.

------


Triathletes blow themselves up all the time,usually from lack of training...

----
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [coredump] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
What's wrong with security theater? 95% of all security is theater.

A race director has 2 choices - do nothing and risk looking like an idiot or do something and at least then he can say he tried. Clear bags are a pretty easy way to be in a position to say you tried.

On a more practical note, I do believe that it took the PD a really long time and alot of effort to check huge stash of runner bags in Boston that were transported from the start to finish. If the bags had been clear, it would have made the search for a 3rd bomb quicker. I predict clear bags will become the norm at any race where participants are bringing/storing stuff during the race.
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [Ultra-tri-guy] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
If thats the case then we make a huge percentage of suicide bombers BHAHAHA I know im really good at it.

-------------------------------------------------
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [coredump] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
The St. Anthony's RD provided a nice response in a similiar thread.
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [endofempire] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
endofempire wrote:
shep wrote:
with the benefit of hindsight do you think anyone from Boston would consider this 'security theater'?


When you say "anyone from Boston" it seems you are implying there was some sort of manly reaction - you know, like what you would see in some countries where they spray the blood off the street and open for business again the next day like nothing happened. What I saw was a little scared girl who jumps up on a chair when she sees a mouse and swats it with a broom. Except she was on the chair swatting for several days.

Just had to quote this for posterity. Maybe you might take a different tone if you knew one of the dead, or one of the dozens that were maimed for life. I suppose your definition of a "manly response" doesn't take into consideration the police officers that risked their own lives in a gun battle or rescuing victims even though there might have been another bomb, or the fact that one police officer was killed and another nearly killed during those days of "swatting a mouse with a broom". But I'm sure you take such selfless risks all the time in your life. I know that many terrible things happen all the time in other countries but maybe it's part of their tragedy that they have no choice but to carry on and by washing the blood off the street immediately they're acknowledging they don't have the resources to do a proper investigation that might catch the perpetrators and help end the cycle of violence.
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [Grant.Reuter] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Grant.Reuter wrote:
Agilecipher wrote:

I'd be willing to give up a few minutes for a bag check to avoid random danger...


So you're willing to do worthless acts of worthlessness to not prevent anything... what idiot would put a bomb in a bag that was going to be checked?

You can check all the bags, make them clear, you can run bomb sniffing dogs before the race, but no matter what you do it doesn't prevent someone who wants to set off a bomb from setting one off in an open area. You can't make an open field/open race course secure, well you can but I don't think anyone wants to pay the cost of that race. How many races happen a year, between all the running races all the tris and everything else. 20k+?? and this has been going on for how many years with not one incident? Out of all these races for all these years we've had one bombing, yet now for some reason people feel unsafe going to a race. I don't get it.

Well said. It seems the only reaction we have anymore is benign overreaction. It's getting almost formulaic:

1. The media and politicians will continue to blow it out of proportion to meet their needs (I expect someone to propose new laws regarding pressure cooker registration and background checks any day now).
2. We will have plenty of fake outrage by keyboard warriors desperate to draw attention to their blogs. Most of these will be posted within 36 hours of the incident. Commenters will tell them how awesome they are.
3. Millions of ribbons are made up, generated, and sold, in appropriate colors. For convenience, the ribbons are not actually ribbon, but stickers, magnets, screen-printed shirts, etc. in the shape of a ribbon. I'm surprised the shape hasn't been trademarked.
4. The phrase "in solidarity with" gets thrown around a lot.
5. We implement mostly useless and ineffective strategies to "prevent" it from happening again.
6. We will accept these inconveniences and additional costs in the name of "patriotism." Yeah, we're really showing them who's boss.
7. The insurance companies latch on, and we won't be able to afford to race because the insurance and costs of extra security will skyrocket.

Wash. Rinse. Repeat. The net result is that we don't actually *do* anything. In the meantime, there are probably thousands of individuals and other groups out there plotting some action that nobody has thought of yet. Effective terrorists stay a step ahead of everybody. This is how terrorism works - making people fearful of normal living.

Sorry. I went off on a rant there and will probably regret this, but I'm just tired of the fake outrage.

Travis Rassat
Vector Cycle Works
Noblesville, IN
BikeFit Instructor | FMS | F.I.S.T. | IBFI
Toughman Triathlon Series Ambassador
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [STP] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
STP wrote:
What's wrong with security theater? 95% of all security is theater.

A race director has 2 choices - do nothing and risk looking like an idiot or do something and at least then he can say he tried. Clear bags are a pretty easy way to be in a position to say you tried.

The problem with this rationalization is that it blatantly focuses all on how the race director looks, rather than measures which actually are needed and useful. And that is the foundation of the objections to security theater.

The problem with security theater is that it adds minimal (read: "zero") protection at the cost of maximum hassle. Death by degrees. They could implement TSA-level screening at triathlons, with long lines, full-body-scanners and having you all take off your shoes to get into transition and I'm sure there would still be a number of fanatics who would sign up and participate. But you still would not be safe.

You don't need to be from Boston to see this. But I am if that actually matters to someone.
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [endofempire] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
What I saw was a little scared girl who jumps up on a chair when she sees a mouse and swats it with a broom. Except she was on the chair swatting for several days

First of all, your reading comprehension sucks. He wasn't talking about any sort of "manly" reaction. Seems like you read it that way just to have an excuse to throw stones.

Second, we were all back at work on Tuesday morning. Does sitting behind your computer screen and mocking people who were afraid in the wake of a public bombing make you feel like a tough guy?

Friday, local authorities decided to shut things down and I'm fine with that. If only to prevent large crowds of people that are common on weekdays and coule be an easy target. These two guys weren't afraid to die (or at least one of them wasn't). Pretty easy to walk a homemade bomb into a T station and take a bunch of people with you on your way out.



Portside Athletics Blog
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [coredump] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I'm about done with St. Anthony's.

If they cancel the swim again I'm out until a new race director is selected.

They took a race that once would sell out in 24 hours and turned it into the laughing stock of of the sport.

Just to bring my smile back from the fear control freaks telling me how things are going to be done - I'm going to fill my plastic bag with the nastiest smelling workout gear I've ever baked.
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [coredump] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I'm guessing more people will be injured by crashing their bikes trying to ride and carry these bags (unlike, say, my backpack that allows me full use of my hands) from the parking lot to transition than will be saved by deterring terrorists.

----------------------------------
"Go yell at an M&M"
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [klehner] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
klehner wrote:
I'm guessing more people will be injured by crashing their bikes trying to ride and carry these bags (unlike, say, my backpack that allows me full use of my hands) from the parking lot to transition than will be saved by deterring terrorists.

bingo. So many races I try to stay less than 10 miles from transition so I can bike to and from the race (Timberman it made the day actually work). I do not give a rat's hiny if they want to search my transition bag but I have no interest in trying to carry plastic bags with my gear at dark o clock
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [coredump] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Personally, I don't see the big deal. Instead of arriving at TA with all my gear on Sunday morning, most of my stuff will already be there with my bike from the mandatory drop on Saturday. It will only take a minute to move all my stuff from my usual transition bag into the plastic bag. So maybe I walk (instead of ride) my bike to TA...no biggie - pretty sure we're all in good enough shape to handle it without sacrificing race performance :)
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [BDoughtie] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
For me it has nothing to do with my rights being violated, I have no right to do a triathlon. Its the fact that doing what the poster suggested doesn't actually change the likelihood of having an attack occur at a race. Its just a waste of time and increases cost.

For your bucs example, all they did was prevent something from occuring in the stadium. Someone could easily do something in the parking lot tailgating or in the line for the security pat down. So did you really prevent anything? No you just changed the location of where someone would do something.

For his example so you prevent someone from walking into transition with a bomb. Well okay except they can still set one off in the line for the bag check, next to the swim start next to transition area, next to the finish line, etc. So the net effect is there is no increase in security just an increase in cost and a false sense of increased safety.
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [coredump] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
As an athlete I am not worried about my safety more about spectators. Check every bag if needed, do whatever you need to do.

After Boston, every RD will need to re-evaluate security..
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [shep] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
shep wrote:
endofempire wrote:
shep wrote:
with the benefit of hindsight do you think anyone from Boston would consider this 'security theater'?


When you say "anyone from Boston" it seems you are implying there was some sort of manly reaction - you know, like what you would see in some countries where they spray the blood off the street and open for business again the next day like nothing happened. What I saw was a little scared girl who jumps up on a chair when she sees a mouse and swats it with a broom. Except she was on the chair swatting for several days.


no no, was trying to say that anyone in Boston at that particular time would probably have been very glad to jump through whatever hoops were necessary to increase safety of all concerned...in hindsight. Nothing about any manly reaction.

In 1983 I was in the Harrods department store as it was bombed by the IRA. Six people died there. In 2011 I was in a bicycle accident which almost killed me. Neither incidents were preventable in my opinion (well, the kid that hit me could have paid more attention I guess, but accidents happen). To think that "if I had done XYZ it wouldn't have happened" or "if the cops would have done ABC they would have prevented it" is shortsighted. The world is a dangerous place. People get injured and killed every day. It can be you, one day. I feel that as the memory of the world wars fades, people start to see an uneventful life as a right. It is not.

Citizen of the world, former drunkard. Resident Traumatic Brain Injury advocate.
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [jackmott] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Yes, every rational person would think it was silly.

It is very depressing how easily this country is turning into a police state.

Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [Agilecipher] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I'd be willing to give up a few minutes for a bag check to avoid random danger...

But it won't avoid anything. Seriously it's a joke.

Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [Medieval Times] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Medieval Times wrote:
As an athlete I am not worried about my safety more about spectators. Check every bag if needed, do whatever you need to do.


So illegal searches just because you are standing on the side of a road to watch a race? Geez, I guess the terrorists have won.
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [tttiltheend] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
tttiltheend wrote:
endofempire wrote:
shep wrote:
with the benefit of hindsight do you think anyone from Boston would consider this 'security theater'?



When you say "anyone from Boston" it seems you are implying there was some sort of manly reaction - you know, like what you would see in some countries where they spray the blood off the street and open for business again the next day like nothing happened. What I saw was a little scared girl who jumps up on a chair when she sees a mouse and swats it with a broom. Except she was on the chair swatting for several days.


Just had to quote this for posterity. Maybe you might take a different tone if you knew one of the dead, or one of the dozens that were maimed for life. I suppose your definition of a "manly response" doesn't take into consideration the police officers that risked their own lives in a gun battle or rescuing victims even though there might have been another bomb, or the fact that one police officer was killed and another nearly killed during those days of "swatting a mouse with a broom". But I'm sure you take such selfless risks all the time in your life. I know that many terrible things happen all the time in other countries but maybe it's part of their tragedy that they have no choice but to carry on and by washing the blood off the street immediately they're acknowledging they don't have the resources to do a proper investigation that might catch the perpetrators and help end the cycle of violence.


There was a lot of individual bravery by many that we can all be proud of. It was important that we caught these guys, and I'm glad we did.


I worry about the Boston response because there are also future lives that we need to protect as well. For example, Al Qaeda has stated - in plain language - that their strategy is to practice asymmetric warfare that targets our economy and terrorizes our citizens. What lesson do they learn when they see that our response to a small attack is to shut down and otherwise disrupt a major American city for days causing tens of millions of dollars of economic damage, and then hyperventilate about it for more than a week in the news and on social media? Does that response make it more or less likely that this attack will repeat itself in some grander form?
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [Grant.Reuter] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Grant.Reuter wrote:
Medieval Times wrote:
As an athlete I am not worried about my safety more about spectators. Check every bag if needed, do whatever you need to do.



So illegal searches just because you are standing on the side of a road to watch a race? Geez, I guess the terrorists have won.


This isn't about terrorists winning or losing. This is about protecting peoples safety. Make sense?!
Last edited by: Medieval Times: Apr 23, 13 8:46
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [shep] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
shep wrote:
with the benefit of hindsight do you think anyone from Boston would consider this 'security theater'?

personally I don't think such an action would occur in transition but just outside where the crowds are watching bike mount and dismount, that tends to be where crowds and VIP tents are.

I was hanging around the finishing shoot waiting for someone else to finish when it happened. I don't know if that qualifies me as "from Boston," or whether I need better creds to have a valid opinion. Nonetheless, I'd consider it an over reaction. I probably wouldn't let it bother me too much though.
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [coredump] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Last year at the Marine Corps marathon in Washington DC everyone had to go through metal detectors to get into the expo and uniformed Marines frisked runners as they walked to the starting line before the event. In Boston last week there were SWAT cops with M4s in my hotel lobby for days after the event. This is the new look of America and its not going away any time soon. Tim
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [Medieval Times] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Well, I'm from Boston ('burbs, but used to be Boston - have stood "right there" many times...), but I don't think that changes my perspective toooo much on the follow on effects of the bombing.

My wife and I are running the James Joyce 10k this weekend, and it'll be a huge field, and the Boston HM in about a month which went from around 2,500 to 8,000 people in the few days post bombing. Awesome display of a giant middle finger to terrorist types...

Anyway, to this thread, I'm just hoping they don't institute so many "safety measures" with no effect that the races become a huge hassle. Many of the changes they COULD make will have no impact on safety, but could ruin the experience of the race.

If there were reasonable precautions that would actually DO something, I'd be open to them (within bounds), but races should continue to be fun, open events... At least IMO
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [Medieval Times] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Medieval Times wrote:

This isn't about terrorists winning or losing. This is about protecting peoples safety. Make sense?!

If it actually protected anyone's safety it might.
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [Medieval Times] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Well one thing is for sure, you guys sure hate the idea of living every day like it's your last...
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [tttiltheend] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
tttiltheend wrote:
endofempire wrote:
shep wrote:
with the benefit of hindsight do you think anyone from Boston would consider this 'security theater'?


When you say "anyone from Boston" it seems you are implying there was some sort of manly reaction - you know, like what you would see in some countries where they spray the blood off the street and open for business again the next day like nothing happened. What I saw was a little scared girl who jumps up on a chair when she sees a mouse and swats it with a broom. Except she was on the chair swatting for several days.


Just had to quote this for posterity. Maybe you might take a different tone if you knew one of the dead, or one of the dozens that were maimed for life. I suppose your definition of a "manly response" doesn't take into consideration the police officers that risked their own lives in a gun battle or rescuing victims even though there might have been another bomb, or the fact that one police officer was killed and another nearly killed during those days of "swatting a mouse with a broom". But I'm sure you take such selfless risks all the time in your life. I know that many terrible things happen all the time in other countries but maybe it's part of their tragedy that they have no choice but to carry on and by washing the blood off the street immediately they're acknowledging they don't have the resources to do a proper investigation that might catch the perpetrators and help end the cycle of violence.


OK, not trying to minimize any tragedy, but what part of having all the race participants use clear searchable bags for all their race gear would have made one whit of difference to the Tsarnaev bros last week?
Last edited by: OneGoodLeg: Apr 23, 13 9:06
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [coredump] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
The Boston bombing took place...

1. In an iconic town,
2. On an iconic day (Patriot's Day), and
3. At an iconic race.

I am signed up to do a non-WTC, half-iron race later this year. After Boston, my relatives expressed concern about my race. It makes me feel sad. My response to them has been:

1. My race is not in an iconic town.
2. My race is not on a special holiday.
3. It's a no-name race.
4. Therefore, what possible interest could a bomber or terrorist have in my race??!!

I'd worry maybe about Boston again, NYC marathon, Ironman Hawaii. The other races: No bomber/terrorist is going to even have them on their radar, because THE PUBLIC DOES NOT CARE about generic (non-Boston) triathlons or marathons. If they go after another sporting event, it is going to be a Giants parade or something that a lot of Americans actually follow and care about.

I'm not in favor of increased security at the generic races. (Unless, of course, the race is known for having stuff stolen from transition, and could use some beefing-up on that account.) Just not interested in the culture of fear invading our grassroots events.

- Oleander
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [Jan de Visser] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Jan de Visser wrote:
shep wrote:
endofempire wrote:
shep wrote:
with the benefit of hindsight do you think anyone from Boston would consider this 'security theater'?


When you say "anyone from Boston" it seems you are implying there was some sort of manly reaction - you know, like what you would see in some countries where they spray the blood off the street and open for business again the next day like nothing happened. What I saw was a little scared girl who jumps up on a chair when she sees a mouse and swats it with a broom. Except she was on the chair swatting for several days.


no no, was trying to say that anyone in Boston at that particular time would probably have been very glad to jump through whatever hoops were necessary to increase safety of all concerned...in hindsight. Nothing about any manly reaction.


In 1983 I was in the Harrods department store as it was bombed by the IRA. Six people died there. In 2011 I was in a bicycle accident which almost killed me. Neither incidents were preventable in my opinion (well, the kid that hit me could have paid more attention I guess, but accidents happen). To think that "if I had done XYZ it wouldn't have happened" or "if the cops would have done ABC they would have prevented it" is shortsighted. The world is a dangerous place. People get injured and killed every day. It can be you, one day. I feel that as the memory of the world wars fades, people start to see an uneventful life as a right. It is not.

Great comment. I recall once seeing a photo essay from a bike tour in Africa which featured human roadkill... the same kind of leathery, sun-baked, 'pizza' like you see all the time that used to be an opossum or a squirrel, only it was kind of sprawled in the form of a person like you'd see in a chalk outline... and it was right there in the street with everyday traffic going by and nobody was fazed by it except the tourist.

I've spent just enough time in 3rd-world countries to see how cheap life can really be. Too many of us are too far removed from it to see what literally billions of other people see all the time, so we're shocked when a glimpse of it comes to us.
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [OneGoodLeg] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
OneGoodLeg wrote:

OK, not trying to minimize any tragedy, but what part of having all the race participants use clear searchable bags for all their race gear would have made one whit of difference to the Tsarnaev bros last week?
I was responding to endofempires comments making light of the Boston tragedy, not expressing any opinion on clear searchable bags. Your question is nonsensical, of course it wouldn't have made any difference. I actually do this particular initiative is an overreaction, FWIW.
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [endofempire] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
There's some truth to what you say but regardless this was a pretty significant incident, even if the loss of life pales in comparison with some other incidents, and under any circumstances it would be difficult to reign the media in given the way the entire episode unfolded. Such is the nature of modern mass media, like it or not.
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [coredump] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
coredump wrote:
I'm doing a large, well-known tri this weekend.

Just received an email from the RD with new security precautions that we apparently have to follow. We apparently will be given two numbered clear plastic bags that we are supposed to use for all of our transition gear. All bags are numbered for each athlete, and we are specifically asked NOT to bring any other type of bags (ie backpacks/transition bags), and everything we do bring will be searched by the PD prior to allowing us to enter transition on race morning.

Am I alone in thinking this bit of "security theater" is a bit much of an overreaction to the events in Boston?

a little inconvenience is better than legs blown off and dead people, we will have dog sniffing bombs are our little tri, just because,

better be safe than sorry
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [Medieval Times] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Before this "Security Precaution" there was no time other than the race start where athletes would be bunched together.

Now, athletes will be waiting in a longer line to get in and out of transition before & after the race.

It is clear to me that this is actually putting the athletes AT MORE RISK THAN BEFORE.

The question is... why?

1. Because a Police Department feels the need to "do something"? (As the Race Director appears to pass the buck here in another thread).
2. Because the race director has no vision to share with the PD what this step DOESN'T DO and ends up CAUSING.

At no time in my history of racing triathlons have I ever been bunched up with a bunch of athletes inside of a transition at any one time (day before, morning of, during race, post race) since they naturally are spread out due to bike racks, staggered starts, & staggered finishes.

How about you let me determine the amount of risk I'm interested in taking. I've signed the waiver.
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [Oleander] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Actually, if I was a terrorist and wanted to sow mass terror, I'd probably go after the non-special events on non-special days. There are far more non-special events and non-special days in a year than special ones (that's the definition of special), and by making people terrified at non-special events on non-special days in non-special places, I'd be more likely to paralyze my hated enemies with fear full-time. They'd end up spending 20% of their GDP and tons of time on security, just to prevent 200 injuries and a couple deaths in a year. Imagine if that bombing had happened at a 1000-person HM in some no-name midwest town. Every single athletic event in the country would feel much more vulnerable.

And to put all this in perspective, it should be mandatory in all news coverage of terrorist events to include the addendum: "meanwhile, 32000 americans die in car accidents every year". Terrorism is tragic, but it's small potatoes compared to other preventable ways people die. I can't find the numbers right now, but there's also the thousands of people that die from accidental discharge of firearms every year too. Hell, I'll bet the 3 dead will pale compared to how many people will die in the swim of triathlons this summer alone, let alone deaths during marathons or training.
Last edited by: AHare: Apr 23, 13 10:16
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [Medieval Times] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Medieval Times wrote:
Grant.Reuter wrote:
Medieval Times wrote:
As an athlete I am not worried about my safety more about spectators. Check every bag if needed, do whatever you need to do.



So illegal searches just because you are standing on the side of a road to watch a race? Geez, I guess the terrorists have won.


This isn't about terrorists winning or losing. This is about protecting peoples safety. Make sense?!

Really... explain how you are going to search every bag of every person and every spectator on a race course that miles long. Once you are done with that explain how it is not just playing wackamole because someone could just walk up and suicide bomb the race, or could make a car bomb or heck a bike bomb. You aren't protecting anyone all you're doing is giving people a false sense of security, and yes you're letting a group of people who want us dead dictate our lives. How do you find that okay?

Further more this "protecting peoples safety" is a giant joke of a talking point. More people die a day from drunk drivin, than if a boston attack happened every day, why don't we just ban alcohol or require breathalizers in every car? Or ban smoking since second hand smoke kills even more people than that. But yes we should be "protecting people safety" by doing a bunch of stuff that doesn't protect anyones safety at a race and just makes us look silly.
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [cervelorider] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Well, not really as far as the MCM is concerned. The MCM expo was held at the Armory of the United States of America. At any military installations, you would have to do the same. The building I work in has been like that, even before 9/11. Try walking through the Pentagon and see how many layers of security you have to walk through :) ... even before 9/11.

Try being a civilian who wants to go to the bathroom by himself while inside the Pentagon :)

cervelorider wrote:
Last year at the Marine Corps marathon in Washington DC everyone had to go through metal detectors to get into the expo and uniformed Marines frisked runners as they walked to the starting line before the event. In Boston last week there were SWAT cops with M4s in my hotel lobby for days after the event. This is the new look of America and its not going away any time soon. Tim


__________________________________________________________________________
My marathon PR is "under three, high twos. I had a two hour and fifty-something."
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [ian moone] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
ian moone wrote:
coredump wrote:
I'm doing a large, well-known tri this weekend.

Just received an email from the RD with new security precautions that we apparently have to follow. We apparently will be given two numbered clear plastic bags that we are supposed to use for all of our transition gear. All bags are numbered for each athlete, and we are specifically asked NOT to bring any other type of bags (ie backpacks/transition bags), and everything we do bring will be searched by the PD prior to allowing us to enter transition on race morning.

Am I alone in thinking this bit of "security theater" is a bit much of an overreaction to the events in Boston?


a little inconvenience is better than legs blown off and dead people, we will have dog sniffing bombs are our little tri, just because,

better be safe than sorry

Bomb sniffing dogs is actually something that could make a difference, though I still think you have an over abundance of caution.

Forcing athletes to use only clear bags in transition, and not allowing transition bags or backpacks does nothing to increase safety, it only increases inconvenience. The same way that banning a 9oz container of liquids from going through security, while allowing you to bring 3 x 3oz containers and an empty 9oz container through does absolutely nothing to improve security.

It's been pointed out what race I'm referring to, and there's 4-5,000 participants. Searching all of those bags (2x per athlete) is going to take a LOOOONG time. It already takes a long time to get into transition on race morning ( body marking, etc. ).

We can react hysterically in response to acts like this, or we can move on with our lives. Placing restrictions on ourselves, and moving more and more into a police state where everyone distrusts everyone else, is playing into exactly what terrorists want, which is for us to be "terrorized" in the course of our normal lives.

--
I ride Felt.
Quote Reply
Post deleted by Medieval Times [ In reply to ]
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [Medieval Times] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply

Quote:

giving people especially spectators a "sense" of security
I think you mean giving people a false sense of security. What people are saying, and I agree, is efforts like the clear bag initiative have little or no benefit. It won't even add to spectators' sense of security unless they know about the clear bags. Having a more visible police presence may add to the sense of and possibly even the real level of security.

A logical extension of the reasoning would be to only allow clear plastic suitcases in airports, so people can feel secure that there isn't a bomb wrapped up in a layer of clothes.


Quote:

Not sure how having law enforcement searching a bag is really that big of a deal

A bag, it's not a big deal. Thousands of bags, it's a huge waste of time and resources.
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [Grant.Reuter] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
You can check all the bags, make them clear, you can run bomb sniffing dogs before the race, but no matter what you do it doesn't prevent someone who wants to set off a bomb from setting one off in an open area. You can't make an open field/open race course secure, well you can but I don't think anyone wants to pay the cost of that race. How many races happen a year, between all the running races all the tris and everything else. 20k+?? and this has been going on for how many years with not one incident? Out of all these races for all these years we've had one bombing, yet now for some reason people feel unsafe going to a race. I don't get it.

Grant,

This has been the discussion that has been going on behind the scenes at larger endurance sports events of all kinds in the past few weeks since the Boston tragedy. There are things that larger events could do and there are things they will do* (perhaps by force from local police, boards of directors, or their insurers). However, you are right that many of these events are wide open to the general public. I am sure some form of "lock down" security could be arranged at specific areas for races, but as you point out I am not sure of participants would be willing to pay that much extra for said event - in this business, it's participants that pay almost all of the freight.

*I noticed that at one of the larger running races locally in our area, a change in the procedure for them was that for the Bag-Check ( it was a point-to-point running race), that you could only check gear in, in a race supplied clear plastic bag. No sports bags, back-packs or personal bags could be checked.

Anyone notice any changes in events in their areas in the past few weeks?







Steve Fleck @stevefleck | Blog
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [Fleck] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
There was a massive police presence at a local half marathon in Rochester, NY this weekend. That was the only difference I noticed.

_____________________________________________________
Instagram | Team Kiwami North America
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [coredump] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
At least the security procedures don't impact the actual race like some of the water "safety" mesures will. Just say no to time trial starts.
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [Fleck] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Fleck wrote:
*I noticed that at one of the larger running races locally in our area, a change in the procedure for them was that for the Bag-Check ( it was a point-to-point running race), that you could only check gear in, in a race supplied clear plastic bag. No sports bags, back-packs or personal bags could be checked.

Anyone notice any changes in events in their areas in the past few weeks?

Interesting. I'm running the Toronto Goodlife this weekend, which is also point to point, and all they are saying is to be vigilant if we see funny stuff when dropping off our bags. I think I prefer that attitude.

Citizen of the world, former drunkard. Resident Traumatic Brain Injury advocate.
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [Fleck] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I was watching Drake Relays last weekend and ran the half marathon on Sunday. There was a lot of volunteer PD there from what my gf said she heard, and a bomb squad unit. I don't know if the bomb squad was normal but it wouldn't surprise me for how big that event is. There was a purse check for women and my gf was pissed that students couldn't bring their backpacks in which is really dumb considering the event is on campus. But besides that nothing out of the ordinary from any other sporting event I have been to.

Same thing for the half marathon, they had a bag drop off in blue relay bags but you basically just walked right into your starting corral and went off. Everything seemed completely normal to me.
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [Fleck] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Yes I ran a 4 mile race in central park put on by NYRR. Only can check the clear plastic bag they give you.
I repeat this is in central park
spectators and the rest of the park where we run no such clear bag rule - would not have made a hoot of difference in boston if racers had clear plastic bags to check.

the ONLY positive change I saw was that NYPD had an eyes in the sky unit at the finish area
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [Grant.Reuter] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
At our Heroes Half last weekend in Everett Washington we had the bomb squad and dogs. Worked out great just to have the dogs quietly moving around a fairly controlled area, and 4 uniformed officers.
Quote Reply
Re: Race Security Overreaction? [coredump] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Here is an article on the security done for Kemah this weekend. Although the article isn't particularly informative I thought it was interesting how it was viewed as a success:

http://www.texsar.org/...013-kemah-triathlon/

Quote:
TEXSAR’s Incident Management Team and Search and Rescue Team – together with Galveston County Office of Emergency Management (OEM), Kemah Police Department and a number of other agencies – successfully provided security for the 2013 Kemah Triathlon. In light of the recent tragedy at the Boston Marathon, Galveston County put a spotlight on public security, and TEXSAR used the opportunity to shine.
“This event was an example of the awesome relationship between TEXSAR and the County of Galveston. TEXSAR did a great job. Words can’t describe how pleased I am,” said David Popoff, Emergency Management Coordinator for the Galveston County OEM.

Days before the triathlon, the Galveston County OEM called up TEXSAR. TEXSAR quickly responded, ready to deploy 11 members. The joint Galveston County-TEXSAR IMT was tasked with providing for the safety of all participants and the public at all times; searching and securing the designated area; and managing a coordinated interagency response effort that reflects the makeup of Unified Command. The objectives were completed, and the triathlon proceeded without any major incidents.

The triathlon was a very positive experience for Galveston County, TEXSAR and all other agencies to integrate their resources. More than 150 people participated in providing safety for the event, including over 60 law enforcement officers and 50 volunteers.

Participating agencies in the 2013 Kemah Triathlon Operation included: The Galveston County Office of Emergency Agency, The City of Kemah, Kemah Police Department, Kemah Volunteer Fire Department, Clear Lakes Emergency Medical Services, Texas City Police Department, Galveston County Road and Bridge, Galveston County Parks Department, Galveston County CERT, Galveston County Amateur Radio Club, Alpha SAR, Montgomery County SAR, and TEXSAR.
Quote Reply