In Reply To:
I agree. There is no balance or rhythm in the arrangement. Its just thrown together. I am thinking that the ficus is going to be a center piece with the ferns being accents. I am a bit stumped because I am inclined to put the ferns up high. But that would really create asymmetry.
Arrangement is a whole new huge subject. I agree with your instincts. Whatever you do... stick to odd numbers of plants... be aware of the light needs of the plant. Think balance (I think you already know that judging by your asymetry comment). If you can raise the ferns above the floor... especially boston ferns with hanging fronds... it is good IMHO. It also helps the plant to avoid being eaten by a cat or a small child if you ever get a cat in the future.[/reply] Cliff. I think I glossed over this the first time. I forgot that you wanted me to keep odd numbers. I was thinking that symmetry required pairs. I guess there could be symmetry with a triangle or hexagon. What was I thinking? Are odd numbers really that important? Can this be the root of our problems?[/reply] Jeff... been away for awhile. Doing some work. The odd numbers thing is one of only two things I remember from a landscape design course I did for a year. The other was the Liberacci ratio and numbers. Apparently they have done surveys or something... and found that odd numbers of plants looks better than even numbers. It looks more natural or something. I usually take this a step further and prefer plants with odd numbers of branches and odd numbers of leaves. I don't bother counting the leaves on a fern... but will count the fronds. Ficus trees are difficult because they lose leaves a lot. If it isn't in a central position... I usually leave it with even numbers of leaves because a leaf will naturally fall off pretty quickly.
And balance is not the same as symmetry. Symmetry you want to avoid. Balance has more to do with overall silhouette mass being balanced along a wall. So if you have a ficus at one end of the wall... you want to have other plants (or furniture) that balance that mass at the other end. Symmetry would be getting another ficus to balance the wall. That doesn't look right. Your room will start to look formally man made... like the matching lion statues on each side of a staircase.
The Liberacci ratio is about 0.62 or near to that. It is the ratio of numbers that are side by side in the Liberacci series. If you ever want a plant to fill a vertical space... then use the Liberacci ratio to let you know how high to make it. It has something to do with the ratio being a common proportion in nature... like the ratio of width of spirals in a seashell or snail going outwards... or the ratio of male genital length to length of one's feet. The Liberacci numbers (and series) are 1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34,55,89,144,233... etc. You'll notice that any number in the series is the sum of the preceding two. A lot of things in nature... like the number of seeds in the middle of a daisy or sunflower are always Liberacci numbers. Also the number of petals. If you can use Liberacci numbers... it looks more natural and pleasing to the eye.
And btw... Cusack got 780'd. You probably know about it. Relief. I think he was set up. Voldey has just left the position vacant. I think he's got a few of his assists filling the gap.