1 yes
2 no she does not talk at lenght about it in fact not at all what procedures happened after race day . she talks a about what happend on race day and then that she got news on the 30th december she won the race .
3
i guess it would be a bit hard for her to say what outside assistance she got when she says she got no outside assistance ....
she says that she never got a penalty from an official .
she says she did not get outside assistance.
says lead bike volunteer for the run reported outside assistance to officials after she had crossed the finish line
to me this sounds strange but we will never get the proper answer that is clear as they obviously have signed a NDA agreement .
but i would be inclined to say, had and official given her a penalty she would never have made it to the flower ceremony in the first place , but she did,if i rember correctly that was 30 min after she crossed the finish line and i guess only a competitor could have made a protest within the hour and since no athlete has come forward that is unlikely , hard to say if this is all correct but we have no evidence against it .
she also claimed that they did not want to tell her what they thought the infringement was to justify the dq..
anyway 2 versions from 2 sides .
my 2 cents, i guess ,the final sentence that the outside assistance had no impact on the result was more to keep face for both sides .
Thoes won, this is the only clear thing , and the other side was not thrown under the bus.
2 no she does not talk at lenght about it in fact not at all what procedures happened after race day . she talks a about what happend on race day and then that she got news on the 30th december she won the race .
3
i guess it would be a bit hard for her to say what outside assistance she got when she says she got no outside assistance ....
she says that she never got a penalty from an official .
she says she did not get outside assistance.
says lead bike volunteer for the run reported outside assistance to officials after she had crossed the finish line
to me this sounds strange but we will never get the proper answer that is clear as they obviously have signed a NDA agreement .
but i would be inclined to say, had and official given her a penalty she would never have made it to the flower ceremony in the first place , but she did,if i rember correctly that was 30 min after she crossed the finish line and i guess only a competitor could have made a protest within the hour and since no athlete has come forward that is unlikely , hard to say if this is all correct but we have no evidence against it .
she also claimed that they did not want to tell her what they thought the infringement was to justify the dq..
anyway 2 versions from 2 sides .
my 2 cents, i guess ,the final sentence that the outside assistance had no impact on the result was more to keep face for both sides .
Thoes won, this is the only clear thing , and the other side was not thrown under the bus.