spudone wrote:
trail wrote:
spudone wrote:
If you aren't getting what I'm saying, windschatten: stop with your bullshit biased posts.
I posted something similar, and agree with it. But deleted it because I think we should respect the OP and leave this thread to be about his son and not a vaccine squabble.
I'm fine having the squabble in another thread.
I just wanted to make it clear what he was doing because it already got the response he wanted from SDG. It is underhanded fearmongering. Germany's decision was increasing vaccine access to children, and it had nothing to do with myocarditis. Windschatten shouldn't have posted on this thread at all.
I think you are out of line to insinuate I had any other intention but to inform about the newest development on what other countries decide in regards to vaccinating juveniles.
Granted, this may not be the best thread for posting it (emotional bias and such), but that conclusion was reached also factoring in the myocarditis uncertainty, so I think it is relevant.
Eyeballs is good (I am sure the OP agrees). But unfortunately that simple factual post also gets the eyeballs of those who can't help themselves to behave like immature juveniles, at best.
That's ok. I can ignore that. It is part of the deal to be subjected to the vomit from biased judgemental zealots.
What is more concerning (and what I can't let slide) is that you make up some story about what the factual bulletin actually states.
In fact, what you made up about the bulletin and about the current stance of the Robert Koch Institute (equivalent of CDC) is in no way even remotely close to the truth.
So my perspective who here smears feces all over the place doesn't paint a pretty picture about your house.
.
Last edited by:
windschatten: Jun 10, 21 17:35