wintershade wrote:
ThailandUltras wrote:
AMC wrote:
Is there something wrong with these HITS races (race direction, course, athlete treatment, etc.)? Feels like the subtext on a lot of posts I've read suggest some issues - I haven't raced one though so have no first hand experience. As an LA guy I love the idea of racing somewhat local, so am curious....
..
The subtext is a result of M-Dot snobbery.
They are low budget,poorly attended events without all the bells and whistles that people seem to need to make a "race" worthwhile.There is also no "You are an Ironman!" at the finishline so many think the effort isn't worth it.I love small events like these from time to time as they can be a lot more social and community connected.
I completely disagree with your “snobbery” point. It’s just a completely different race day experience to line up with 2500+ athletes, run through streets lined with cheering spectators, etc etc vs doing a race on an empty course that feels more like a supported training ride.
I enjoy the local Olympic Distance race with 100-200 competitors just as much as the next guy. But when it comes to doing an all day 140.6 mile “A” race once or twice a year (let alone if you’re a 1 and done bucket lister), clearly the market has spoken. People want a production. So you can wax nostalgic all you want about the good old grassroots days but as far as I’m concerned the bigger the better for full distance IM.
..
Why did Challenge in North America fail? Ironman snobbery,that is why.It has little to do with the size of the event,it is the almighty logo that people love to tattoo on their bodies.
Last edited by:
ThailandUltras: Sep 11, 20 14:07