All of cycling is a completely arbitrary challenge. Using a compact with 32 is harder than using an extended range AXS which is harder than using a triple with a granny gear or an MTB with super low gearing. Which one of those doesn't count to Everest on?

Here's another hypothetical for people: For those of you who are opposed to turning TDS down, are you also in favor of minimum grade requirements for an IRL Everest? Because that's the same thing. A 3% grade will allow you to spin up even with normal road gearing, but you're going to be on that 3% a long damn time. I don't think anyone really thinks that 175W at 90rpm feels the same as at 45rpm, but if we're comparing irl to virtual, it has to go both ways too. There are always tradeoffs. What, should irl everesting have maximal cadence and minimal grade average now too?

If you make one aspect easier, you make another aspect harder. TDS might allow you to spin a lower wattage at a more comfortable cadence, but that lower wattage is going to necessitate additional time. That's no different than choosing a shallow grade to climb. Every rider will optimize for their strengths, irl or not.

---

JustinDoesTriathlon

Owner, FuelRodz Endurance.