Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Re: Interesting Article - Interview with an age grouper caught for an inadvertant doping violation [TheStroBro]
TheStroBro wrote:
She would need to get the supplement independently tested and then sue the manufacturer for restitution. Otherwise naming the supplement is just slander.


Why is it slander? It's not a contaminated supplement issue. It's right there on the label. And it's perfectly legal, only banned if you're competing under the WADA umbrella. Slander means you say something false. According to her statements she could name the pre-workout drink with Nelumbo nucifera on the label and not say anything false about it. It'd be a good public service in case it's a popular pre-workout drink in some circles among people who are tested.

SaltStick has sodium in it. That's not a slanderous statement by me.
Last edited by: trail: Nov 19, 19 10:17

Edit Log:

  • Post edited by trail (Dawson Saddle) on Nov 19, 19 10:17