Kay Serrar wrote:
gphin305 wrote:
chaparral wrote:
TMI wrote:
JSA wrote:
Your cartoon is the exact reason why Dershowitz spoke up today and blasted Mueller and the exact reason why Dershowitz's comments today were not a flip-flop from his earlier position.Sean Davis at The Federalist is certainly a biased pundit, but I found much of his take on Mueller's presser to be spot-on.
https://thefederalist.com/...led-the-rule-of-law/
Quote:
Nationwide bar rules governing all practicing attorneys in the United States also explicitly prohibit Mueller’s display during Wednesday’s press conference.
“The prosecutor in a criminal case shall … refrain from making extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused,” states Rule 3.8(f) of the American Bar Association’s rules of professional conduct.
Multiple federal agents and prosecutors reached out to The Federalist after Mueller’s press conference to express dismay at the former FBI director’s behavior.
“I’d have been crucified under this rule for a ‘not innocent’ comment about an uncharged party,” a former federal prosecutor told The Federalist. “I literally cannot fathom holding a press conference to say that an uncharged person was not innocent.”
“I wish these former FBI directors would learn their lessons: keep your mouths shut unless you’re referring a case for prosecution,” Jeff Danik, a retired FBI supervisor, said during a phone interview with The Federalist on Wednesday.
If Mueller didn't find enough evidence in Vol. II to come to the conclusion that obstruction had been committed, what more evidence are we expected to find? Testimony from McGahn?
Here's what another person who has been following this debacle thinks about "Volume 2"
https://www.breitbart.com/...ys-a-complete-fraud/
You really do have no shame to post that link. It's an intellectually vacuous article about the view of a Conservative radio pundit, speaking on FoxNews, posted on Breitbart.
[faceplam]
Here, how about this link.......the real Robert Mueller. Starting to sound like "Volume 2" might be good for placing in your bathroom?.
"Strip away all the tortured legalese and intellectual incoherence, it all boiled down to one thing - Mueller saying, "I can't prove he did it, but
he did it." He talked about "another process," and with that weak, pathetic attempt to hide the explosive nature of what he was really saying, Mueller called on Congress to impeach the president. What Mueller did at his press conference wasn't justice. It wasn't the rule of law. It was a smear -- false statement designed to cause material harm to President Trump, delivered with malice ... President Trump should sue Robert Mueller for libel."
Next: Let's open a corruption investigation into the business dealings of Mueller and Comey in their swampy trips around the revolving door. Let's investigate those Lockheed Martin contracts. Let's investigate those client relationships at Mueller's swamp law firm where he had a conflict of interest.
https://www.foxnews.com/...ulous-never-trumpers