I thought that this was a fascinating read and wanted to share. Plus, it has the obligatory Trump angle making it irresistible for LR consumption:
"A few years ago, a team of British researchers decided to revisit the facts of King George III’s madness with a new analytic tool. They loaded some 500 letters written by the king into a machine-learning engine and laboriously trained the system to recognize various textual features: word repetition, sentence length, syntactical complexity, and the like. By the end of the training process, the system was able to predict whether a royal missive had been written during a period of mania or during a period of sanity."
I wonder what it might find in looking at Trump's lifetime "literary works".
https://www.wired.com/...ficial-intelligence/
"100% of the people who confuse correlation and causation end up dying."
"A few years ago, a team of British researchers decided to revisit the facts of King George III’s madness with a new analytic tool. They loaded some 500 letters written by the king into a machine-learning engine and laboriously trained the system to recognize various textual features: word repetition, sentence length, syntactical complexity, and the like. By the end of the training process, the system was able to predict whether a royal missive had been written during a period of mania or during a period of sanity."
I wonder what it might find in looking at Trump's lifetime "literary works".
https://www.wired.com/...ficial-intelligence/
"100% of the people who confuse correlation and causation end up dying."