Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Re: Yet another law that doesn't apply to King George [jhc]
Amy certainly did weigh in, and backed down from her simplistic analysis when challenged. It is in the archives. Other attorneys (STP?) weighed in even more clearly that the issue was quite complex, your simplistic ranting not withstanding.

I think the only purported attorney who didn't back down was Johnny Quest, who also opinied that the Congress changes the Constitution by passing laws. Loved that one. I still don't believe he is an attorney by the way, but who knows.

I never said Re: Sealed Case addressed the differences between citizens and non citizens. In fact, I specifically said it drew no such distinction. The quotes in the various threads are not in the context of noncitizens, or even in the context of the particular case at hand, but a general overview of the law.

Edited to add this quote from Amy, just a couple posts below the post you reference: " There have been a lot of good arguments made since I last checked in. And I certainly don't need to add to the legal debate."
Last edited by: ajfranke: Jan 5, 06 12:19

Edit Log:

  • Post edited by ajfranke (Dawson Saddle) on Jan 5, 06 12:19