Reposting from the crickets thread.
pad y = 582
pad x = 456
do you know how that compares with how you're currently riding?
Pad Y = 537 (this is pad included)
Pad X = 505
I've been told I am a long torso type, but really feel like I am more on the even proportioned side. I like to be low and stretched out and ride further back on the my saddle than the measuring point, which because of how the nose rolls off on my Dash it would lead me to think it might be skewing my number?
I don't think the numbers generated are that far off, but I also struggle finding integrated front end bikes that fit me without running under-mount extension setups. So, buying a bike with 580ish stack range would probably make it hard for me to hit my 535ish number.
My YouTubes
Slowman wrote:
found it. you slipped by me. what i get is: pad y = 582
pad x = 456
do you know how that compares with how you're currently riding?
Pad Y = 537 (this is pad included)
Pad X = 505
I've been told I am a long torso type, but really feel like I am more on the even proportioned side. I like to be low and stretched out and ride further back on the my saddle than the measuring point, which because of how the nose rolls off on my Dash it would lead me to think it might be skewing my number?
I don't think the numbers generated are that far off, but I also struggle finding integrated front end bikes that fit me without running under-mount extension setups. So, buying a bike with 580ish stack range would probably make it hard for me to hit my 535ish number.
My YouTubes