Slowman wrote:
it is, nevertherless, the policy. best warm yourself up to it. kiley and i have traded a number of PMs. the test is not going to be published here unless i'm convinced that the test is done correctly. there is plenty of time and opportunity to convince me of that, and what will convince me is not onerous. if the test is husbanded by somebody (or somebodys) who know what they're doing, and the protocol and process is sound, then i have no quarrel hosting its publication.
Dan.. what I hope is a fair question. Are you going to apply that policy universally? We have seen plenty on here that doesn't meet this new standard.
EDIT.. ignore me, this has been covered. I only got a few posts into the thread and my astonishment overtook my patience.
Would love to get your thoughts on the P5x white paper, though.