There has been a feud between the CIA and the WH, with Dems throwing in with the CIA.
ok so where does fitzgerald fit in?
The CIA says she was classified; other sources say she was not.
what source says she was not classified that is more credible than the cia and patrick fitzgerald? <- please answer this
None. I think he's a well-meaning zealot. Perhaps you are too.
so you have no reason to think fitzgerald is a zealot, but you think it anyway. why?
Which means what?
it means that your attempt to compare the starr investigation to the fitzgerald investigation is inherently flawed. there is ample evidence that the starr investigation was nothing but partisan war. you have yourself admitted that you have absolutely no reason to believe that fitzgerald is some kind of political agent. yet you choose to believe it anyway, completely without cause other than it fitting your pre-determined conclusion.
ok so where does fitzgerald fit in?
The CIA says she was classified; other sources say she was not.
what source says she was not classified that is more credible than the cia and patrick fitzgerald? <- please answer this
None. I think he's a well-meaning zealot. Perhaps you are too.
so you have no reason to think fitzgerald is a zealot, but you think it anyway. why?
Which means what?
it means that your attempt to compare the starr investigation to the fitzgerald investigation is inherently flawed. there is ample evidence that the starr investigation was nothing but partisan war. you have yourself admitted that you have absolutely no reason to believe that fitzgerald is some kind of political agent. yet you choose to believe it anyway, completely without cause other than it fitting your pre-determined conclusion.