Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Wheel dilemma
Hello guys,

I’m currently looking for an upgrade for my ~2008 clincher Aeolus 5.0s (10 -> 11 spd, '14 Cervelo S3). I must say that I was very happy with them.

I’m looking for fast, but also training wheels (~3000 miles per year). I don’t mind the trouble of tubular tires, if they allow me to compete and also train faster.

I ride 95% on flats, but windy roads.

I’m pretty light (55 kg), but the roads here are really bad.

My maximum budget is 1500$ CAD, but lower would be even better. I therefore have a some options looking at the current market:
- HED Jet 5/6, clincher version, 2012, 1700g (ouch), around 900$,
- Bontrager Aura 50mm, clincher version, 2013, 1750g (double ouch), around 650$
- Easton EC90 Aero 58mm, tubular version, 2012 but brand new rebuilt hub, 1350g, around 800$
- Mavic Cosmic SLR, clincher version, 2014, 1600g, around 1500$
- Zipp 404, tubular version, 2013, , 1450g, around 1500$
- Zipp 606, tubular version, 2010 but converted to 11 spd (how? Not sure…), 1400g, around 1000$
- Hand built 50mm, clincher version, 2014 (0 mile), 1350g, Sapim CX-RAY plays (2,3mm X 0,9mm), Alchemy ORC 20/24 hub, around 900$
- Hand built 60mm, tubular version, 2013, 1450g, Chris King R45 Ceramic hub, around 900$

What would you choose and why?

My current preference is the Easton EC90 Aero tubular, because it's pretty light, much cheaper than the Zipps, looks really good, and the hub is brand new.

Thanks a lot,
Yan
Last edited by: Xcessiv: Sep 12, 14 6:47

Edit Log:

  • Post edited by Xcessiv (Big Pines) on Sep 12, 14 6:38
  • Post edited by Xcessiv (Big Pines) on Sep 12, 14 6:45
  • Post edited by Xcessiv (Big Pines) on Sep 12, 14 6:47