That's basicly what I remember... What might also be noted is that the study used glucosamine sulphate NOT Glucosamine HCL ... The HCL version of GS has not been tested (if at all) as thoroughly as GS. The HCL version is what most people find on the shelves in Walmart's and other discount stores. It's much cheaper. But hasn't been proven to work. Some have theorized that the HCL version may not be as effective and would require a larger dosage (Why? because the HCL is a much bigger molecule - I know of no research to back this up)... so, basicly you will need to spend more than you might think. So, the real question becomes - is it cheaper if you need to use more and it may not work as well?

I stopped using GS and CS because prescription drugs are actually cheaper for me than the non-prescription GS/CS. What gives? It's call a really good Prescription Card (and quit a few Doc friend's samples). Also what makes GS and CS less appealing for me is the newer generation NSAID's. They have fewer side effects than the older NSAID's and actually do work quicker and faster. (for me at least) CS and GS take a MUCH longer term usage to take effect. In short, the newer NSAID's are (for me) actually cheaper and more effective within a shorter period of time.

However, I do believe that CS and GS have a place on the athlete's shelves. But, it's use should be placed on the same level as prescription drug use.

FWIW Joe Moya