"Thus, I must assume that Landis did call Lemond. The attempt to intimidate Lemond reveals to me that Landis and his group were afraid of Lemond's testimony."
I think there's a jump in logic there. Even if Landis did call him, it wasn't necessarily for purposes of intimidation.
Besides, even if he's afraid of LeMond's testimony, that wouldn't mean that he's guilty. If one assumes that he's innocent, there are still good reasons why he would not want that kind of testimony.
-----
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I--
I took the one less traveled by,
Which is probably why I was registering 59.67mi as I rolled into T2.
I think there's a jump in logic there. Even if Landis did call him, it wasn't necessarily for purposes of intimidation.
Besides, even if he's afraid of LeMond's testimony, that wouldn't mean that he's guilty. If one assumes that he's innocent, there are still good reasons why he would not want that kind of testimony.
-----
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I--
I took the one less traveled by,
Which is probably why I was registering 59.67mi as I rolled into T2.
Last edited by:
Rob C in FL: May 18, 07 11:12