RFXCrunner wrote:
Personal theory- Crowie is getting up there in years (can you believe he is 38?), he doesn't have a ton of really productive time left to win world championships. Orbea is having issues giving him something they promised, so he picks a stage that the industry will notice and the public (for the most part) will not to make a bit of a scene. Shake something loose and get the equipment he needs NOW, not a year from now.
I work with a guy who is a top flight Masters runner (current national champion for Masters HM), and he certainly admits he started seeing diminishing returns after his mid 30s. I have an inkling Crowie may have that in the back of his head. How many Konas does he have left to not take every opportunity to win?
This is more or less my personal opinion too.
I also think that if Orbea can't get him something to be competitive, they need be kicking the ass of their R&D and engineering and prototype manufacturing team rather than letting their star miss out on championships. They are the ones at fault here, not Craig. You can't send your star into battle handicapped. If you can't keep up with the other bikes in the design and manufacturing competition, you better give him a carte blanche to find some faster weapons for race day.
This is lose lose for Orbea unless they come up with a better bike before Kona (personal opinion of mine). If they were crazy enough to sue Alexander for breach, they probably lose more sales than the revenue upside they would make from a pro athlete with limited financial means (compared to the lost revenue from all of us not buying their bikes for first giving Craig a slow bike and secondly sueing him after being too slow on execution to keep pace with their bike peers).
Again, this is all peanut gallery commentary based on this thread only. Today, the only think Craig said at the post race press conference is that this topic is too early to comment on and I respect his statement and will wait to hear the entire story.
Dev