Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence?
Quote | Reply
It has been well established that, when it comes to aero bikes, disc brakes are worse than rim brakes in every sense. They are heavier. They are slower. They are expensive as all fuck. They aren't compatible with our existing equipment infrastructure. Aesthetically, they look downright terrible. The new Cervelo dentist bike effectively comes with four derailleurs, strapped all over the frame, which is defiled further by sloppy routing and mechanical cables and shit. What a nightmare.

At any rate, disc brakes are here, and there is simply no going back. Cannondale's P4x, Parlee's jawn, Cervelo's P5 BryanD edition, Diamondback's Andean -- they have officially arrived, so welcome to a new era in which rim brake-based frames and wheels are as good as irrelevant. You just bought a Dimond Marquise? Congratulations, you're a common moron. Show me a man who just dropped $2k for a Zipp Super 9 for racing this year, and I'll show you a man who just lost $1,000 in equipment equity.

One year from today, the most expensive equipment that you presently own will be worth shockingly little. Like tubulars and 26ers before them, rim-brake frames and wheels will be swept into the bowels of the classifieds, rendered obsolete by this new standard that has been forced upon us by the cycling industry generally and stan specifically. There really is no going back.

We as consumers are left with a pretty shitty choice. You can pay through the nose right now and acquire first generation product that broadly blows (but will undoubtedly become significantly better in six or twelve or eighteen month's time), or you can stand pat while your 808s depreciate in value down to approximately the square root of zero. Either way, it's going to be expensive. The only thing that is possibly worse than being an early adopter right now is being a late one.

So how will the rest of you navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? Storm the exits now or later? If you aren't buying now or in a year or so, you better be saving your shekels, because your old equipment won't be worth shit by the time you try to join the rest of us (i.e. the majority of us, who have already succumbed to this inferior braking system).

Welcome to the future. It's worse than the past. It's slower. It's heavier. It's expensiver. You better hold on to your wallet, because whether you like it or not you're about to get fleeced.
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [PubliusValerius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I'm gonna keep my P3 rolling with Magura hydros on an aluminum Flo90 rear with Catalyst cover and Flo60 carbon front until someone comes up with an integrated bike and wheelset that is obviously faster.

I appreciate you stirring things up in the meantime.

Scott
Last edited by: GreatScott: Jan 8, 17 19:10
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [PubliusValerius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Didn't read your wall of text but I won't move to disc brake for road training/racing until it is common enough that I can get neutral wheel support during road races.
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [PubliusValerius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
It has been well established that, when it comes to aero bikes, disc brakes are worse than rim brakes in every sense PV states his opinions as facts.

FTFY ;P


I really see two ways to go. If you are the kind of person with lots of disposable income who only keeps bikes a few years then jump right in. You might be buying the equivalent of a BetaMax or a plasma TV, but you'll be able to get the improved tech when it comes out. For those who keep their equipment a long time (my road bike is from '04), just stick with the existing stuff until the disc brake designs get sorted (full hydro, aero designs, standard rotor diam., standard thru axle or QR).

ECMGN Therapy Silicon Valley:
Depression, Neurocognitive problems, Dementias (Testing and Evaluation), Trauma and PTSD, Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [PubliusValerius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Not really sure if you actually believe what you write, or are truly just trying to be an asshole.....or both.

But.....when I walk through transition at any race, big or small, a good majority of the bikes there are -not- latest and greatest. If disc brakes are here to stay, which maybe they will be, I honestly think you are grossly over-estimating how quickly the general triathlon population will switch to them.
Electronic shifting has been around since roughly 1992 (Mavic Zap), and the more popular di2 for, I don't know, 10+ years?? Yet there are still plenty of folks using cable shifting.

I'm sure you'll pick apart my response.....but, you are wrong. Rim brakes/wheels will be around, and available, for many many years to come.
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [Titanflexr] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Or maybe you've just got 5 bikes and 8 wheel sets, there's just no room (for the moment) for something new.

But I'm thinking about it. Maybe when I turn 65...
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [PubliusValerius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I will wait until the standards converge or at least until a decent package from a reputable brake maker shows up. Cable disc brakes are, in a way, the worst combination of rim brake and disc brake features (and one argue that the Magura hydraulic rim brakes, on aluminum brake tracks, are the best). It would be nice to see roadbike and/or TT bike hydraulic brake master cylinders done in an aesthetically reasonable way.

Less is more.
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [PubliusValerius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply

Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [PubliusValerius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I don't really give a shit. I'm riding a 8 year old bike with 20+ year old Zipp 440 wheels. Sure I might be giving up a couple of minutes, but what-evs.

Hey, but feel free to be outraged. That's your right.
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [PubliusValerius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
This is hilarious.

Your argument about the merits/demerits of disc brakes is not worth responding to in my opinion. If you ever ride in an environment where there are technical descents, there simply is no comparison--disc brakes win out right every single time. If you don't, it's fine that you don't need disc brakes, but your needs are not everyone's needs. And as you said, they will get better and the trade-offs will be even fewer. Furthermore, by moving the weight to the center of the wheel as opposed to the rim, there is every reason to believe this will contribute to disc brakes ultimately being faster. http://www.cyclist.co.uk/...weight-vs-hub-weight

As for depreciation....I have no idea who buys bike parts as an investment. As you pointed out, it's not a good one. You rail against technological change based on depreciation? We'd still be using stone wheels if society followed your few. I'd say people who have bought wheels and frames in the past few years are in a very good position on the development chain. The gains from discs are, as you claim, marginal. So aside from descending they aren't losing much. And if they ride their equipment and maintain it, just as they get old and need replacement, the market will be supplied with matured technology and better data from which informed decisions can be made. As for used prices on goods such as carbon wheels and frames....I'd point you to the idea of a "lemon market." Goods such as this that can hide flaws are priced in the used market as though all of them are lemons. Many consumers, myself included, won't buy this type of product used unless I know it's provenance through a very trusted source...e.g. buy wheels off a friend I know personally. It's not just technological change that drives down the value of second hand cycling parts.

Finally, "we as a consumers are left with a pretty shitty choice..." Really? No rim brake bikes on the market that you could choose...and disc brake bikes that someone else could choose? See...a few years ago we did not have that CHOICE.
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [PubliusValerius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
It took me a minute to figure out what you meant by "Cannondale P4X".

I'm an equipment whore so I've decided to hedge my bets by selling one of my tri bikes and all of my rim brake wheels except my 404 NSWs. Depending on how Cannondale specs their new tri bike I might be interested in one of those. It's a good looking bike and the geometry *looks* appealing. Why would I pick one up? Because I'm an equipment whore and I'm a sucker for through-axles (totally unnecessary, I know, I just like the idea).

I saw a P5X in the flesh for the first time two days ago. It almost looks worse in person. Cervelo has produced some gorgeous bikes in the past so the aesthetics of the P5X tell me it was truly a data/purpose-driven design. The fact that they weren't able to make it materially faster than the P5-6 tells me we've reached peak aero (for frames).
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [PubliusValerius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
PubliusValerius wrote:
It has been well established that, when it comes to aero bikes, disc brakes are worse than rim brakes in every sense. They are heavier. They are slower. They are expensive as all fuck. They aren't compatible with our existing equipment infrastructure. Aesthetically, they look downright terrible. The new Cervelo dentist bike effectively comes with four derailleurs, strapped all over the frame, which is defiled further by sloppy routing and mechanical cables and shit. What a nightmare.

At any rate, disc brakes are here, and there is simply no going back. Cannondale's P4x, Parlee's jawn, Cervelo's P5 BryanD edition, Diamondback's Andean -- they have officially arrived, so welcome to a new era in which rim brake-based frames and wheels are as good as irrelevant. You just bought a Dimond Marquise? Congratulations, you're a common moron. Show me a man who just dropped $2k for a Zipp Super 9 for racing this year, and I'll show you a man who just lost $1,000 in equipment equity.

One year from today, the most expensive equipment that you presently own will be worth shockingly little. Like tubulars and 26ers before them, rim-brake frames and wheels will be swept into the bowels of the classifieds, rendered obsolete by this new standard that has been forced upon us by the cycling industry generally and stan specifically. There really is no going back.

We as consumers are left with a pretty shitty choice. You can pay through the nose right now and acquire first generation product that broadly blows (but will undoubtedly become significantly better in six or twelve or eighteen month's time), or you can stand pat while your 808s depreciate in value down to approximately the square root of zero. Either way, it's going to be expensive. The only thing that is possibly worse than being an early adopter right now is being a late one.

So how will the rest of you navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? Storm the exits now or later? If you aren't buying now or in a year or so, you better be saving your shekels, because your old equipment won't be worth shit by the time you try to join the rest of us (i.e. the majority of us, who have already succumbed to this inferior braking system).

Welcome to the future. It's worse than the past. It's slower. It's heavier. It's expensiver. You better hold on to your wallet, because whether you like it or not you're about to get fleeced.


LOL nice wall o rant, glad we have all heard your OPINION.


Jim

**Note above poster works for a retailer selling bikes and related gear*
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [PubliusValerius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
PubliusValerius wrote:
It has been well established that, when it comes to aero bikes, disc brakes are worse than rim brakes in every sense.

Except for the sense that they stop faster, but you listed so many facts i can understand why you would have skipped the most detrimental point to your argument. I agree for the most part, i think disc brakes suck as well. They look terrible IMO. Its not something i am looking forward too but i am sure eventually it will be the normal and we will forget about how things used to be and get used to how things are.
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [PubliusValerius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Easy, I will not buy a disk brake bike. Canyon or P5 are in my future.
But go ahead and enjoy spending your money anyway you want!

Team Zoot So Cal
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [Karl] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Karl wrote:
Easy, I will not buy a disk brake bike. Canyon or P5 are in my future.
But go ahead and enjoy spending your money anyway you want!

Better yet, all you guys who buy disc brake bikes...I'll buy your second hard wheels and fast bikes at firesale prices...everyone wins. Last time I checked almost no one is going faster than Mark Allen's 8:07 in Kona on Zipp 440's and a Huffy


Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [Darren325] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Darren325 wrote:
If you ever ride in an environment where there are technical descents,...

I do...in fact, I just rode up and down the Gibraltar Road climb today ("Queen Stage" of the 2016 Amgen TOC) ...because I can :-P

Quote:
there simply is no comparison--disc brakes win out right every single time.

Actually, they don't...then again, I'm comparing to a "best in class" setup of Hydraulic calipers on Hed Jet+ Blacks w/Turbine brake tracks. They work just as well (power AND modulation) as my disc-braked road(ish) bike, and do so with no noise AND no signs of overheating, something I can't say about the discs. In fact, I have a couple friends with disc-braked road bikes that also agree that down the steepest, most technical descents, the discs tend to fade (as compared to their rim-braked road bikes)...so apparently it's not just me.

Quote:
Furthermore, by moving the weight to the center of the wheel as opposed to the rim, there is every reason to believe this will contribute to disc brakes ultimately being faster. http://www.cyclist.co.uk/...weight-vs-hub-weight

I'm calling BS on that 50g at rim vs 50g at hub "test report". Do the math. Compare the differences in rotational inertia of those cases and then compare them to the TOTAL inertia of the bike+rider system. In NO way is the difference in rotational inertia 20% of the total inertia, as it would need to be to account for that 4X vs 5X acceleration time. My quick back of the envelope puts that rotational inertia difference at more like 0.1% of the total, worst case. Not buying it.

BTW, since regular wheels are typically significantly less mass than an equivalently designed disc brake wheel, any rotational inertia "gain" from moving mass to the center can't come close to countering the sheer additional mass in the first place. Sorry...those are the facts.

http://bikeblather.blogspot.com/
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [Tom A.] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
In other threads Pubes about peak aero being reached already, so why do you need to buy new shit anyway ?

I'll keep riding my Twinblade until the thing falls apart, if you don't have the legs you won't win shit anyway.

devashish_paul wrote:
Last time I checked almost no one is going faster than Mark Allen's 8:07 in Kona on Zipp 440's and a Huffy


Like i said, it's all in the legs and a decent fit, you don't need new shit every couple of years. The guys on world tour cycling teams seem to go pretty fast on nice clean basic set ups.
Last edited by: TriguyBlue: Jan 8, 17 18:51
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [devashish_paul] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
The Huffy was a nice bike.

Nevertheless, I don't count times from the 1990s against those from today. It was a completely different era.

'It never gets easier, you just get crazier.'
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [PubliusValerius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
How about buy and ride whatever you want?

Make Inside Out Sports your next online tri shop! http://www.insideoutsports.com/
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [PubliusValerius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Quote:
One year from today, the most expensive equipment that _I_ presently own will be worth shockingly little. Like tubulars and 26ers before them, rim-brake frames and wheels will be swept into the bowels of the classifieds, rendered obsolete by this new standard that has been forced upon us by the cycling industry generally and stan specifically. There really is no going back.


Firstly, I don't believe Personal Vendetta.

But if you change the personal pronoun in this screed, it becomes clearer that PV is just having another rant about the cost of triathlon. Second hand has always been the way to get into the sport for people of limited means, and will remain so.

My dad owned a second hand yacht (which he swapped for his cheap fishing boat). As far as hobbies go, this one isn't too bad.

'It never gets easier, you just get crazier.'
Last edited by: georged: Jan 8, 17 20:03
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [PubliusValerius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Actually, I like to diversify..... and invest with caution.

For playing around in the dirt I bought a mechanical disc equipped steel bike last year....single speed cross is just better with good brakes, and in the mud and muck disc brakes win, hands down.
I have exactly two wheelsets for that bike (and won't buy more unless they break). Most fun ever!

For ALL my road riding and time trialing I will stick with rim brakes until the day I have to upgrade (I have plenty of NOS parts to keep me going for a long time).
They just work, are light, aero and easy to adjust / service anywhere (you can get pads from a Huffy to work on a DA rim brake shoe if you need to).

In 45 years of riding on the road I did never experience a situation that good and well adjusted rim brakes of any kind couldn't handle. I have ridden high end hydraulic disc brake equipped bikes Off Road and I am underwhelmed....(horrible return on investment, IMO).

So no, I am not getting fleeced anytime soon. But that's maybe because I have been around the block before when/as new technology was introduced.
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [PubliusValerius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I buy bikes pretty infrequently and ride them into the ground. My next couple frames will be rim brake frames and if I have to hunt to find new old stock frames to buy I will. I'm also looking forward to prices dropping pretty aggressively on wheel sets. I also ride those till their dead. So a disc brake roady (no TT bikes) is a long way off.
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [PubliusValerius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
You seem to have an ever-increasing appetite for attention. How can I help? Do you need a hug or something?
Last edited by: trail: Jan 8, 17 21:48
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [georged] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
georged wrote:
The Huffy was a nice bike.

Was it really a Huffy or a rebranded frame?

-------------------
Madison photographer Timothy Hughes | Instagram
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [PubliusValerius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
PubliusValerius wrote:
Either way, it's going to be expensive. The only thing that is possibly worse than being an early adopter right now is being a late one.

Like many, I'll have to disagree with you. It's like keeping hold of a good quality car; once you (or the original buyer) takes the initial depreciation hit, you're better off sticking to your guns, until trickle-down makes the newer 'better' stuff more affordable. In the meantime, what you drive or ride will still do you good service.

Case in point are my Zipp tubular wheels - funny old thing, I can still get top quality tyres for them....

29 years and counting
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [Timtek] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Timtek wrote:
georged wrote:
The Huffy was a nice bike.


Was it really a Huffy or a rebranded frame?

Pretty sure that he got sponsored by Huffy, but this was a one off custom by someone else not Huffy. We could not buy this bike commercially if we tried. Coming back to this thread, I really think that all the people who will dump fast superbikes and fast wheels to upgrade to disc brake'd bikes will offer the rest of us an option to buy into today's high end at a bargain!
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [PubliusValerius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
This is a bit of an obvious strawman PV.

Rim brake wheels and brake components will not vanish overnight. The frames will probably go first if this becomes the new norm. There's no reason to fear being forced to update existing equipment against your will unless you're involved in competition where it becomes mandatory (e.g. if UCI dictated that all road racers MUST use disk brakes).

I do lots of my riding on hilly terrain that's very often wet. I weigh ~82kg. Disk brakes would be welcome on many of those rides. Not essential, but an improvement over my current, good quality, properly adjusted, cable actuated rim brakes. Rim brakes are easy, light and convenient. Disk brakes have some drawbacks but are a more reliable solution, especially in wet conditions. They're brakes, I'm a lot less interested in their weight or aesthetics than their performance in allowing me to stop the bike as and when I want to.

Aesthetic objections are rather silly. Deep section rims looked silly compared to minimalist box section ones, until they became common amongst the pros, and now people can't get enough of them. STI levers looked chunky compared simple brake levers on road bikes but down tube levers have now become a rare sight. Aesthetics are mostly a matter of familiarity and association. You'll get over it.
Form driven by function should be the philosophy behind any good mechanical design.
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [PubliusValerius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
How will YOU navigate through an empty ST with no one from the industry left to brake down your expertise ..

*
___/\___/\___/\___
the s u r f b o a r d of the K u r p f a l z is the r o a d b i k e .. oSo >>
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [PubliusValerius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
PubliusValerius wrote:
So how will the rest of you navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? Storm the exits now or later?

I waded through a lot of BS to find what you were asking.

Just like when MTB's changed from rim to disc brakes, I bought because I needed (wanted?) a new bike but the change in brake design was irrelevant to the timing of my buying. It'll be the same with road bikes getting disc brakes, I'll just change when I'm about due for another bike. Yep my Zipps wont be transferable but wheel design has probably improved faster than bike designs anyway.
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [Slunnie] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Slunnie wrote:
Yep my Zipps wont be transferable but wheel design has probably improved faster than bike designs anyway.
And if it hasn't, you can just change the hub & spokes on your wheels.
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [PubliusValerius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I like disc brakes... I also like that there might be an unloading of rim brakes wheels and other stuff.

I'm probably a few years from getting a disc brake TT bike. I'll let the industry get sorted and ride the wave of parts being sold by those that are going to disc brake wheels.
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [PubliusValerius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
As my current ride ages, I will enjoy the superior aeroness and the fact my bike already has disc brakes 700c wide. When I finally do upgrade, I will enjoy the better braking in emergency situations and the rain. The only constant is change. Getting worked up about it is needless suffering.

----------------------------------------------------------
Zen and the Art of Triathlon. Strava Workout Log
Interviews with Chris McCormack, Helle Frederikson, Angela Naeth, and many more.
http://www.zentriathlon.com
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [PubliusValerius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I'm still dealing with the move from 10 to 11 speed bikes. I have one 11 speed and three 10 speeds. I'm thinking of upgrading another bike to 11 speed for easier rear wheel interchangeability but have no plans to go to disc brakes. I'm pretty sure there will be plenty of rim options for years to come.
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [HuffNPuff] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
The answer is easy. Enjoy the firesale prices on "obsolete" gear that is marginally (if at all) worse. From a mountain bike perspective, there were great deals to be had on non tapered, quick release, 26" forks and wheels. Since shifters are affected as well as frames, forks, wheels, etc, I bet you'll be able to build up a bike for half the price.
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [PubliusValerius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I take offense to the "dentist bike" reference! Thats like CEO money!

2024: Bevoman, Galveston, Alcatraz, Marble Falls, Santa Cruz
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [devashish_paul] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
The early 90's... some pretty fast performances in those years. *cough*


devashish_paul wrote:
Karl wrote:
Easy, I will not buy a disk brake bike. Canyon or P5 are in my future.
But go ahead and enjoy spending your money anyway you want!


Better yet, all you guys who buy disc brake bikes...I'll buy your second hard wheels and fast bikes at firesale prices...everyone wins. Last time I checked almost no one is going faster than Mark Allen's 8:07 in Kona on Zipp 440's and a Huffy

Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [PubliusValerius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Disc brakes in triathlon could signal a split between tri bikes and TT bikes for a while. For one to win out, UCI will have to allow non double-diamond geometries and disc brakes, since I'd imagine bike companies sell more bikes for tri than straight TT. Some people obviously want to do both, so that will limit their choices for new bikes in the future.

For TT, it actually makes more sense to remove one brake altogether than switch to discs. The weight, aero penalty, etc. make them an even worse argument for TTs. If UCI allowed disc brakes, I doubt many teams would switch since they spend so much time in the wind tunnel and weighing components that the data would drive them against disc brakes.

If this is the point in which tri and TT bikes diverge, then equipment will not be rendered useless. There will be a secondary, albeit smaller, market in TT. If UCI allows disc brakes and TTers adopt them, then I agree, we're all f**ked.
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [PubliusValerius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
PubliusValerius wrote:
It has been well established that, when it comes to aero bikes, disc brakes are worse than rim brakes in every sense. They are heavier. They are slower. They are expensive as all fuck. They aren't compatible with our existing equipment infrastructure. Aesthetically, they look downright terrible. The new Cervelo dentist bike effectively comes with four derailleurs, strapped all over the frame, which is defiled further by sloppy routing and mechanical cables and shit. What a nightmare.

If the above part of your prediction/assumption is true (slower/heavier), then I would think the opposite would actually occur....current superbikes and accompanying accessories that fit these bikes (wheels that you mention) would might actually increase in value.....certainly not become obsolete and devaluate as your premise indicates. Personally, I feel pretty good about currently owning the last model P4 with two sets of wheels (Zipp900/404 and Enve 8.9s) and if I ever want to sell it, don't think it's going to depreciate any more than it already has. If pros start demonstrating significantly faster times on these new disc equipped bikes, then I might start to worry.
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [NordicSkier] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
NordicSkier wrote:
The early 90's... some pretty fast performances in those years. *cough*


devashish_paul wrote:
Karl wrote:
Easy, I will not buy a disk brake bike. Canyon or P5 are in my future.
But go ahead and enjoy spending your money anyway you want!


Better yet, all you guys who buy disc brake bikes...I'll buy your second hard wheels and fast bikes at firesale prices...everyone wins. Last time I checked almost no one is going faster than Mark Allen's 8:07 in Kona on Zipp 440's and a Huffy


I'm going to give Mark Allen in 92 the benefit of the doubt that the super stuff that Indurain, Rominger, Riis, Bugno, Chiapucci, Delgado and crew were on starting in 91 (when they left Lemond behind) )was not quite in Kona 'yet' by 92. Mark's performance was in line with his own performance 89 and 90 and that's the year that Lemond won the TdF purportedly before the peloton went on the EPO superjuice.

So I know that Dan is more liberal with accusations now, but if you're talking 92 in triathlon you probably need to be more careful....performances from 1994 till today, well we have no clue who was/is on what.
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [devashish_paul] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Not accusing anyone. Not giving anyone a pass either.
EPO was introduced in 1989. No test until... 2001?

Modern equipment has HUGE advantages over the old stuff... so when I see these old times that were so fast compared to modern times, I have to wonder.
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [NordicSkier] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
NordicSkier wrote:
...

Modern equipment has HUGE advantages over the old stuff... so when I see these old times that were so fast compared to modern times, I have to wonder.

Or makes you wonder if the so called advantages of new equipment are exaggerated...
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [SBRcoffee] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
SBRcoffee wrote:
NordicSkier wrote:
...

Modern equipment has HUGE advantages over the old stuff... so when I see these old times that were so fast compared to modern times, I have to wonder.


Or makes you wonder if the so called advantages of new equipment are exaggerated...

Take the most dubious wind tunnel claims and scale them back by half.... still a big advantage.
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [PubliusValerius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I'm navigating it just fine. I only road ride now doing the occasional Gran Fondo when I have time. However, I ride regularly with a pretty serious group of Master's cyclists who are members of my Club - there are a couple of Provoncial and National Masters champions in the group.

My ride is a 7 year old Cervelo R3 with a, 10-speed Dura-Ace 7800 gruppo (exposed shift cables - the horrors). I ride a modest amount. Keep it well maintained. I have no problem hanging with the group on hard training rides.


Steve Fleck @stevefleck | Blog
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [PubliusValerius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I will navigate it by not worrying about it.

Feeling left behind because one has a perfectly functional older generation product is a conditioned response to being bombarded by marketing. Also, stop worrying about what other people think. If they are judging because you got an old bike then they aren't friends and their opinion doesn't matter.
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [SBRcoffee] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
SBRcoffee wrote:
Not really sure if you actually believe what you write, or are truly just trying to be an asshole.....or both.

But.....when I walk through transition at any race, big or small, a good majority of the bikes there are -not- latest and greatest. If disc brakes are here to stay, which maybe they will be, I honestly think you are grossly over-estimating how quickly the general triathlon population will switch to them.
Electronic shifting has been around since roughly 1992 (Mavic Zap), and the more popular di2 for, I don't know, 10+ years?? Yet there are still plenty of folks using cable shifting.

I'm sure you'll pick apart my response.....but, you are wrong. Rim brakes/wheels will be around, and available, for many many years to come.

agree with this. It's definitely a pretty good majority of bikes that are not latest and greatest. My 2014 cervelo p2 is probably newer than a lot of bikes. Bikes/wheels also lose their value pretty quickly anyway.
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [ZenTriBrett] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Quote:
The only constant is change. Getting worked up about it is needless suffering.

Very true.

Quote:
“True happiness is to enjoy the present, without anxious dependence upon the future, not to amuse ourselves with either hopes or fears but to rest satisfied with what we have, which is sufficient, for he that is so wants nothing.
Seneca.

'It never gets easier, you just get crazier.'
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [PubliusValerius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Thank you for presenting an interesting side to the different debate topics on ST during this usually slow time of year. Withthat, there are three major flaws in your initial post that jump out to me: 1) the rate at which the buying public (not pros) will switch to disc brakes on a tri/tt bike, 2) the idea that I have to spend lots of money to prevent the loss of a smaller amount of money, and 3) the notion that the value of parts is going plummet in value as the market shifts to disc braking.

1) As has been pointed out in previous posts, the general public is not that quick to change standards, especially when it will cost thousands of dollars. Examples include 10-11 speeds, mech to electric shifting, aluminum to carbon frames. If the disc brake sky falls, it will take 5-10 years, if it falls at all.

2) Trying to argue that spending money now to save a little bit in the future is a good idea if it involves retirement accounts are rental properties. But just a rough calculation has a high end bike around $8,000. A used value would be around $4,000. If it becomes obsolete, maybe $0. A new disc brake bike is around $10,000. Calculate about a loss of 50% of value to depreciation to $5,000. Worst case to best case is still a $1,000 less of a loss by the rim brake bike owner.

3) There will be a market for most parts, especially high quality parts for the foreseeable future. Just trying to determine what all has to fall into place for disc brake bikes to become the dominate species shows the likelihood of your speculation playing out if very slim.

-edited for initial pleasantries

While a few thousand $ might sound like a lot, it is not enough to get most of us in this sport too riled up.

Oui, mais pas de femme toute de suite (yes, but I am not ready for a woman straight away) -Stephen Roche's reply when asked whether he was okay after collapsing at the finish in the La Plagne stage of the 1987 Tour
Last edited by: Vincible: Jan 9, 17 14:19
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [PubliusValerius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Considering I still have a healthy stock of 20mm Records and Cronos, I reckon I'll be fine. Be nice to pick up another P5, or even a P3, as a training bike when it's cast aside.
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [windschatten] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
windschatten wrote:
Actually, I like to diversify..... and invest with caution.

In 45 years of riding on the road I did never experience a situation that good and well adjusted rim brakes of any kind couldn't handle. I have ridden high end hydraulic disc brake equipped bikes Off Road and I am underwhelmed....(horrible return on investment, IMO).



I've ridden about as long as you. I commuted 20km each way to high school for several years (when snow didn't stop me), and in addition to MOP IM training for almost a quarter century, I have cycle commuted (25km round trip) to and from work virtually every day for 16 years now, from freezing to boiling, sun and rain. 95% of my riding has been entirely safe, using rim brakes. 4% has been butt puckering fear inducing commuting or training in the rain. 1% has been much safer commuting in the rain on my hydraulic disc hardtail MTB.

When the savings account and space in my bike shed allows, I will get a hydraulic disc equipped road bike so that ALL my riding is as safe as it can be 100% of the time.

TriDork

"Happiness is a myth. All you can hope for is to get laid once in a while, drunk once in a while and to eat chocolate every day"
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [NordicSkier] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
NordicSkier wrote:
The early 90's... some pretty fast performances in those years. *cough*
It was the rinsed cottage cheese
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [devashish_paul] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
devashish_paul wrote:
NordicSkier wrote:
The early 90's... some pretty fast performances in those years. *cough*


devashish_paul wrote:
Karl wrote:
Easy, I will not buy a disk brake bike. Canyon or P5 are in my future.
But go ahead and enjoy spending your money anyway you want!


Better yet, all you guys who buy disc brake bikes...I'll buy your second hard wheels and fast bikes at firesale prices...everyone wins. Last time I checked almost no one is going faster than Mark Allen's 8:07 in Kona on Zipp 440's and a Huffy



I'm going to give Mark Allen in 92 the benefit of the doubt that the super stuff that Indurain, Rominger, Riis, Bugno, Chiapucci, Delgado and crew were on starting in 91 (when they left Lemond behind) )was not quite in Kona 'yet' by 92. Mark's performance was in line with his own performance 89 and 90 and that's the year that Lemond won the TdF purportedly before the peloton went on the EPO superjuice.

So I know that Dan is more liberal with accusations now, but if you're talking 92 in triathlon you probably need to be more careful....performances from 1994 till today, well we have no clue who was/is on what.

The doctor on Lemond's team in 1989, Dr. Van Mol, gave EPO to at least one rider on the team in 1988 after diagnosing him with anemia. LeMond claimed he had anemia in 1989 during the Giro, but I am sure that was just a coincidence. After all, like Sgt. Schultz, LeMond saw nothing amiss with his rivals who were all doping in the 80s. Doping in cycling started with Armstrong, dammit, and that is why LeMond had to use his 1970s knowledge of exercise physiology to figure out Lance was doping instead of first hand knowledge of a sport where doping was as normal as putting air in tires.
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [PubliusValerius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I can't believe this thread has made it 3 pages without a single reply from you. People are way too sensitive here.....

Bravo sir..... golf clap......

blog
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [PubliusValerius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
still running a 7spd drivetrain on my road bike, have not had any trouble finding parts for it.. nice and cheap, the way I like it.
still have tubulars on the race bike too, though if racing IM I would reconsider.
for bleeding edge tech, there are still a good number of discless frames available, and I'd be very surprised to see them disappear. Obsolescence may be problem for the fashion-conscious but it isn't anything I worry about..
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [stevej] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
stevej wrote:
I can't believe this thread has made it 3 pages without a single reply from you.

Troll Index (TI) is calculated as number of replies divided by number of posts by the OP. So adding posts to your own thread rarely helps your score. That said, I've seen some excellent two-part trolls before, where an OP is able to come back and bring a thread back to life and more than double the number of replies.
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [PubliusValerius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
My bike is 12 years old and I just bought new brake pads, homie. I'll stay with what I have, but thanks anyway.
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [SBRcoffee] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
SBRcoffee wrote:
Not really sure if you actually believe what you write, or are truly just trying to be an asshole.....or both.

Nailed it right on the head! Pubes, that's gotta hurt. lol!
Quote Reply
Re: Welcome to the disc brake era. How will YOU navigate rapid equipment obsolescence? [PubliusValerius] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Disc brakes remind me of 3D TV's a few years ago. Only time will tell.

But we are a resourceful bunch and will figure it out. In the meantime I'll keep rolling hydraulic.
Quote Reply