Dear USAT,
I am one of the 1200 athletes who were disappointed last weekend. I appreciate your communication with us and I believe that you are primarily concerned with our safety. That being said I respectfully disagree with your decision to cancel Nationals and to open up Worlds to all who showed up for packet pickup.
Triathlon is by nature a risky sport and we are deciding to incur risk any time we train or race. Rarely the odds catch up with us and we get hurt or even killed doing our sport. While I agree with your decision to cancel the swim which could have been truly dangerous, I do not think it was appropriate to cancel the rest of the race. All of us have ridden our bikes in the rain and most of us have fallen. In signing up for this race and signing the waiver we are accepting these unforeseen risks. In this case that would mean managing your speed around the corners. Undoubtedly some of us would have dumped our bike on Sat and may have even gotten hurt but that would have been related to our skills, excessive speed in relation to our skills and our freedom and responsibility to race within our skills. There would have been ways to limit the amount of people on the course by letting people go off in a less frequent TT format. I would like to think that we are the best AG triathletes in the US and could have made an informed decision for ourselves.
There were many options to consider in choosing a team to represent the US in HI. I feel you have chosen the one of the worst. By allowing every one to go, you are essentially making this a meaningless event. Unlike some of our top athletes, I have been training for years (with my VO2 max of 59) to qualify legitimately for this race. I will be damned if you are going to just hand it to me. I would have been much happier if you just used your discretion and chose a team based on our reputations/past results or took 16-20 from Shreveport. This may or may not have included me but would have at least maintained the integrity of the team and more importantly the identity of the team as "the best" (with whatever inherently flawed selection process that entails.)
I feel you ultimately had our best interests at heart and I harbor no personal animus; I just think your decisions here were poorly thought out.
I am one of the 1200 athletes who were disappointed last weekend. I appreciate your communication with us and I believe that you are primarily concerned with our safety. That being said I respectfully disagree with your decision to cancel Nationals and to open up Worlds to all who showed up for packet pickup.
Triathlon is by nature a risky sport and we are deciding to incur risk any time we train or race. Rarely the odds catch up with us and we get hurt or even killed doing our sport. While I agree with your decision to cancel the swim which could have been truly dangerous, I do not think it was appropriate to cancel the rest of the race. All of us have ridden our bikes in the rain and most of us have fallen. In signing up for this race and signing the waiver we are accepting these unforeseen risks. In this case that would mean managing your speed around the corners. Undoubtedly some of us would have dumped our bike on Sat and may have even gotten hurt but that would have been related to our skills, excessive speed in relation to our skills and our freedom and responsibility to race within our skills. There would have been ways to limit the amount of people on the course by letting people go off in a less frequent TT format. I would like to think that we are the best AG triathletes in the US and could have made an informed decision for ourselves.
There were many options to consider in choosing a team to represent the US in HI. I feel you have chosen the one of the worst. By allowing every one to go, you are essentially making this a meaningless event. Unlike some of our top athletes, I have been training for years (with my VO2 max of 59) to qualify legitimately for this race. I will be damned if you are going to just hand it to me. I would have been much happier if you just used your discretion and chose a team based on our reputations/past results or took 16-20 from Shreveport. This may or may not have included me but would have at least maintained the integrity of the team and more importantly the identity of the team as "the best" (with whatever inherently flawed selection process that entails.)
I feel you ultimately had our best interests at heart and I harbor no personal animus; I just think your decisions here were poorly thought out.