Thanks Francois. I think. It's called a sandwich as in "ian sandwich" or francois sandwich. etc... pretty common reference up here in igloo land.

---

Ian MacLean
http://www.imfit.ca
Success comes when fear of failure goes

I usually refer to hooking up with 2 girls at once as HEAVEN, hehehehehehhe

---

_____________________________________________

I have horrible back problems but I have zero problems staying in an aero position for 180k. Why? Because I ride steep and because I train regularly in that position. Simple as that.....Gerard

dp 2 guy, 1 girl is definitely a sandwich.



:|

Actually the one kid I know who did it said it was good, but not as great as he thought it would be. ( I wasnt involved so I can't vouch either way) However, if I'm going to screw someone, I'd better have their full attention.

sandwich is a specific position - 2 guys, one girl, one in the pink, one in the sink. It's like a turbo shocker.



What this has to do with triathlon, I have no idea.

You already got my FULL attention just looking at that fine booty, very nice.

---

_____________________________________________

I have horrible back problems but I have zero problems staying in an aero position for 180k. Why? Because I ride steep and because I train regularly in that position. Simple as that.....Gerard

Slowly, but surely, the Slowtwitch forum is approaching the entertainment value of famous web sites such as urbandictionary.com or even (with a little help in the wine thread) moderndrunkardmagazine.com ...

Awesome!
Dre'

---

-----------
...

That drives me crazy--not the thought of you and your roommate together--the grammar. It should be "my roommate and me". It sounds wrong, but it is right. Remove the words "my roommate and" and say it. You will see immediately that the "I" is wrong. That is a handy way to do it that will lead to the right result about 99% of the time. It will bring your standardized testing scores up 20 points.

You are very right. If I was industrious, I would chane my post. And btw, my grammer section on my standardized tests was almost perfect. I apparently just fail to use my mad skills

...and how did the spelling section go for you?

that is wrong aint it monk.

True, in a sense, but this usage has 2 things going for it...1 - most people think that it is correct so in time it probably will come to receive official acknowledgement; 2 - as a piece of communication it is effective, ie you know what the person means.

But don't get me started on the benighted apostrophe....

---

kiwipat

per ardua ad astra

very well, although you would never be able to tell. I think I got a 700 on the verbal section.

Yeah--True in the sense of being, actually, true.

I guess my kiwi mate fulla spends too much time watching porn and not enough time practicing :-)

im a lawyer bro, grammar is my life.

if they have big enough boobs, the sandwich with 2w, 1m can be fun though :-)
nothing in sandwich says there should be a pe... ;-)

(ok...thread is rated R, kids under 18 and Tibbs, leave the room ;-)

1. Me too. 2. That may be a bit extreme.

But I still start Internet sentences with "And" and "But". In this thread, maybe also "butt".

I may have to dump my girlfriend because she is the worst offender of this "my friend and I/my friend and me" thing. Has them reversed about 100% of the time. GRRRRIND, GRRRRRIND, GRRRRRIND.

But there are probably some things about me that bother her.......naw. Probably not. I can't imagine what they could be. Hmmmmmm. I'll keep thinking and keep you posted.

But I still start Internet sentences with "And" and "But".

Monk,

I used to think this was wrong until I started seeing literature published by Ph.D's containing sentences which begin with "And" and "But". Enlighten me.

Caleb

Actually, I think for legal and other technical documents, the semantics of any text is more important than the grammar. Now, grammar is a most useful and loyal servant of semantics, and things can get hellishly confusing when the grammar is sloppy, but for all that I do believe that it is possible for a text to be ungrammatical yet semanticly coherent.

Not to get too technical on it, of course.

---

kiwipat

per ardua ad astra

And if I could, I would. But I can't.

And I am not sure why it is wrong. But I'm sure it is.

I agree both my parents are lawyers and I was always tought that in vertain situations in is ok to start w/ and.

The "me" and "I" issue is NOTHING compared to the "their, they're, there" issue.

---

______________________________________________
Father Kevin

http://www.churchofcycling.org

'and' 'but' 'or' are all conjunctions - they are designed to join two sentences (more accurately, clauses) together. If all you have is one sentence or clause, with one subject and one verb, then you don't need a conjunction, and especially not at the start of the sentence. But language is fluid, so now it is not seen as such a crime to begin a sentence the way this one did. Inelegant, perhaps, but not really incorrect.

---

kiwipat

per ardua ad astra

Wow! This thread went way weird in a hurry...

---

Ian MacLean
http://www.imfit.ca
Success comes when fear of failure goes