styrrell wrote:
I'm still gonna guess that Mavic didn't put nearly as much effort into the shape as Zipp does. Why do you guess that? I'm not a huge Mavic fan, but they are giant company compared to Zipp, and have produced many many innovative products over the years. Some big hits and some big misses. Not just my opinion, I will loosely quote a high-ranking Mavic person from the last year or two (source unknown):
"Mavic puts above all important on weight, then considers factors such as rolling resistance and aerodynamics"
Now, I'm sure Vaughters slapped some sense into them, but Zipp, Hed etc has put aerodynamics #1 for the past 15 ish years, sounds like Mavic is just now getting their act together.
-Physiojoe
-Physiojoe
Instagram: @thephysiojoe
Cycling coach, Elite racer on Wooster Bikewerks p/b Wootown Bagels