Thanks Marca for taking the time!
Completely agree with what you are saying.
I believe this could lead to many people reacting to the mainstream advice on sports nutrition. Hopefully for improving their health and still have fun and perform at their maximum ability.
We tend to take this sport so seriously than we sometimes do anything to achieve our goals or dreams. Sadly, our many times health gets in the way and we realize that once we leave the sport as mature adults that can't response to sugars and high-carb diets as they could in their 30's or 40's while exercising many times per week.
It's just enough to look at retired athletes from other sports and easily notice that they couldn't cope anymore with the habits they had at their peak. Growing a belly is probably the least of their health problems when they're in their 60's.
Thanks again for your valuable opinion!!!
marcag wrote:
chetatkinsdiet wrote:
So funny you bring this up- a bit ago I saw some twitter stuff on this and I engaged a bit with the questions. FYI I'm @jpschust in this thread. https://twitter.com/Sci_Tai/status/1410697506980171776 Interesting thread and your point is valid
There is probably 0 value in wearing a CGM on race day (for a non diabetic)
However, there are many people that would benefit from knowing if their glucose response was a little off. Not for training reasons but for general health reasons.
Many times people asked me if I could take a glucose reading "just to see" and they were quite high. Not diabetic crazy high but over what they should be.
It just seems like total BS to put it on Jan and make triathletes think they need this to do IM.
let me put in another way. If tomorrow, Apple makes it appleWatch measure blood glucose and you can read it by simply wearing the watch, this has MUCH more benefit to the general public than the IM athlete. BTW, I bet we see this in the next few years. Blood glucose by NIRS.
A triathlon Youtube channel for busy triathletes:
https://www.youtube.com/...WTx0rqYv2t8uRR1c7AFA