Triathlon Forum
Login required to started new threads
Login required to post replies
Re: Which sub-$2,000 tri bike saw the best improvements for 2006? [anonymo_8]
[ In reply to ]
I was just going to put in a vote for the '06 Dual.
Tom Demerly
The Tri Shop.com
Tom Demerly
The Tri Shop.com
Re: Which sub-$2,000 tri bike saw the best improvements for 2006? [Tom Demerly]
[ In reply to ]
Pretty hard to ignore Dura Ace on that frame for less than $2K. You have to be happy with those wheels and aerobars though. I would be I suppose.
Last edited by:
jameshinton: Oct 11, 05 13:32
Re: Which sub-$2,000 tri bike saw the best improvements for 2006? [anonymo_8]
[ In reply to ]
I know this board is over-the-top with/for Cervelo, but if that bike is priced at under $2,000 - what more do you need really!! Throw some race wheels on that baby and that bike will be on par or "better" than a number of the bikes that will be ridden by finishers in the top 10 in Kona on Saturday.
Fleck
Steve Fleck @stevefleck | Blog
Fleck
Steve Fleck @stevefleck | Blog
Re: Which sub-$2,000 tri bike saw the best improvements for 2006? [Fleck]
[ In reply to ]
Does anyone know if cervelo is going to have a cheaper dual than the DA model this yr? I haven't seen any specs for it, does it exist? The DA dual is a sweet deal, but i'm a poor college student and ~$1500 is about the max I can handle.
Re: Which sub-$2,000 tri bike saw the best improvements for 2006? [Fleck]
[ In reply to ]
But how much of this bike will really be Dura Ace?
bar-ends - yes
FD- yes
RD- yes
chain/cassette - ?
cranks - ?
bb - ?
brake calipers - ?
I still think the bike is a good deal and may even buy one myself, but at what point can you call this a DA bike instead of a bike with some DA components?
I know Gerard and co. want to get the most marketing bang from the DA label, and I'll bet they'll succeed at that. And I can't blame them for trying to keep their costs low by substituting parts where they feel they can get equivalent performance for lower cost (although I don't like the FSA cranks). But without the cranks/bb/brakes I don't think it's reasonable to call this a DA bike.
Truth in advertising and all that...
bar-ends - yes
FD- yes
RD- yes
chain/cassette - ?
cranks - ?
bb - ?
brake calipers - ?
I still think the bike is a good deal and may even buy one myself, but at what point can you call this a DA bike instead of a bike with some DA components?
I know Gerard and co. want to get the most marketing bang from the DA label, and I'll bet they'll succeed at that. And I can't blame them for trying to keep their costs low by substituting parts where they feel they can get equivalent performance for lower cost (although I don't like the FSA cranks). But without the cranks/bb/brakes I don't think it's reasonable to call this a DA bike.
Truth in advertising and all that...