There is a letter to the editor in the latest Triathlete mag, written by a young triathlete obviously struggling with high race fees and closed out races. While I can certainly understand his frustration, I have to disagree with his derision of "yuppies" and "posers" coming out to crowd his beloved sport. Certainly the sport continues to grow at a rapid rate, faster than new races can be organized to spread the load. We've all probably experienced the frustration of closed registration a few times in recent years. But is this bad for the sport? Should we come down on "yuppies" and "posers" flooding the races?
NOT ON YOUR LIFE. This idea reflects an immature view of the sport and the world at large. These same "yuppies" and "posers" are the grassroots support on which our sport is built. Without them attending races and regenerating popularity for the sport, the opportunities for the elite racers (of whom this young writer must think his is or at least will be) would be sparse at best. The $$$$$$$$$ that they pour into their individual pursuit of the sport, for whatever personal reasons, provides the capital for the biz to keep forging ahead. If the "yuppies" and "posers" didn't by their new Kilos, P3s, T1 suits, and Polar HRs, etc. those companies wouldn't have nearly the capital to reinvest in discovering the "next level" of gear. Young mister budding triathlete wouldn't have the choices he currently has. Without them, new IMs wouldn't stand a chance of coming to fruition. IMH wasn't built on the strength of the pro athletes. IMoo isn't a success because of the pros.
So what do the rest of you think? I don't think the guy is wrong for feeling frustrated. Heck, I am frustrated with closed races too since I often can't sign up way in advance due to uncertainties with military service. But I think we need to guard against elitist thoughts like this. While I am certainly more than a little competitive, at least AG-wise, I find more satisfaction these days helping a friend or aquaintance to finish their first tri or du than I do landing on another podium, especially if they are younger.
NOT ON YOUR LIFE. This idea reflects an immature view of the sport and the world at large. These same "yuppies" and "posers" are the grassroots support on which our sport is built. Without them attending races and regenerating popularity for the sport, the opportunities for the elite racers (of whom this young writer must think his is or at least will be) would be sparse at best. The $$$$$$$$$ that they pour into their individual pursuit of the sport, for whatever personal reasons, provides the capital for the biz to keep forging ahead. If the "yuppies" and "posers" didn't by their new Kilos, P3s, T1 suits, and Polar HRs, etc. those companies wouldn't have nearly the capital to reinvest in discovering the "next level" of gear. Young mister budding triathlete wouldn't have the choices he currently has. Without them, new IMs wouldn't stand a chance of coming to fruition. IMH wasn't built on the strength of the pro athletes. IMoo isn't a success because of the pros.
So what do the rest of you think? I don't think the guy is wrong for feeling frustrated. Heck, I am frustrated with closed races too since I often can't sign up way in advance due to uncertainties with military service. But I think we need to guard against elitist thoughts like this. While I am certainly more than a little competitive, at least AG-wise, I find more satisfaction these days helping a friend or aquaintance to finish their first tri or du than I do landing on another podium, especially if they are younger.