So they are carbon clinchers... They seem to appear exactly the same as their old carbon fairing counterparts but lighter.

Front
Flo 45 CC $549 Flo 60 CC $549 Flo 90 CC $549

Rear
Flo 45 CC $599 Flo 60 CC $599 Flo 90 CC $599 Flo Disc CC
$949

Chris, I didn't. I have yet to take a look at the details. Even if they were the same though, I'm sure they would be as great as the old ones which I love. I'll have a look at the aero details tonight.

Edit: Had a look and stand corrected, they are not the same and they do seem to be an improvement over the previous models. I have a question on your "Time Savings with Flo Wheels" table. The 60, 90, disc aluminum+carbon are being referred to as 2016 whereas the 30 is still 2013. Did anything change for 2016 on the 60, 90, disc Alu+carbon models?

There is no mention of heat dissipation/heat resistance. Would they be suitable for long, technical descents in 100-degree heat?

I was really impressed when I looked through the site this morning.
Obviously, I can't speak for the validity of the aero claims (don't worry, I trust you!) but it seems that you've really paid attention to what the clued up athlete wants to see in aero marketing and data dissemination.

Thanks! That was the goal. We had a strong feeling that the old "80% of your time between 10 and 20 degree of yaw" wasn't right, so we wanted to prove that it wasn't, and then create a product that worked specifically for the yaw angles we did find.

I especially likes the interactive drag graph where you could tailor which wheels you can see. It was a nice little touch.

Glad you like it. That took some serious tinkering but I got it to work. It's a feature I always wanted as an athlete so it only made sense to put it on our new site.

New 45mm CC faster than first gen 90mm FLO wheel.
That's got to make them an attractive prospect amongst roadies!

That is also the goal ;)

Do you have a time speed difference table of the new vs old flos? I see the graph but a dolt. I talk in seconds ;)

Also love those cycling jerseys!

Congrats on what appears to be a very nice, new product line fellows!

Just finished up reading the aerogeeks first look: http://aerogeeks.com/...eel-line-first-look/

Quick question around your yaw findings when out on course:

What kind of typical cruising speeds were you cycling at to get these results? 16, 18, 20mph?
Obviously wind conditions on the day etc will have their own effects, I'm just trying to work out what sort of skew I should apply for my own riding. Faster = less yaw etc

Congrats on the new products, first they seem awesome, second they are very well introduced with all the information available at the same time !

I do have a couple of questions :
1- I saw you molded the shape of the GP4000S II 700x23 on the FLO30 to get it right and then develop your wheels around it. Very smart. My question about that process is : did you take into account the shape the tire might take from the 17mm internal width of the 45mm carbon clincher which is your minimum internal width if I read correctly to the 19.4mm internal width of the FLO30 and the new carbon/alloy model ? Or was the difference small enough between 17 and 19.4mm that it did not really matter (big difference going from 15 to 17mm but then differences gets smaller when going bigger).
2- Since lower yaw angles were getting higher in the priority list, I'm sure Attack 700x22 or the narrow Supersonic 700x23 were tested in your 20 tires pre-test, how did they compare at lower yaw angles to the GP4000S II 700x23 you ended up choosing ? Since the 45 is narrower at brake track, is it possible that those narrower tires make more sense on the 45mm model but you standardized with one tire (actually two 700x23mm models) just to keep the information easily readable ?
3- Per you own specs and graphs the carbon clincher disc is 40gr lighter but also slightly less aero than the carbon/alloy disc, would you recommend the carbon/alloy disc most of the time (it also has the wider internal width which makes the 40gr extra weight even easier to accept) and only recommend the carbon clincher version to the custommer wanting to save the very last gram ? I would pick carbon clincher all the time for all rims just because I'm not a fan of the big holes in carbon/alloy (don't want to start the debate, it's just a personnal preference) but since the discs are the same kind of construction in both carbon clincher and carbon/alloy I honnestly wonder which one I would pick.

Looking forward to reading your answer, and congrats again... I was not sure I needed new wheels but I think I do ;-) !!!

I could be wrong but it looks like the nipples are outside of the carbon which is different than that they had before being under the fairing.

It probably just looks like it cant tell for sure.