In Reply To:
Why is it silly? The tire is the same size from bead to bead, but on a 23 mm wide rim, the total circumference of tire and rim is greater by 4 mm. That would seem to me to be an indisputable fact. Granted, the incremental volume doesn't sound like much, but it IS incremental.
I just did some back-of-envelope math and, unless I'm way off (which I'll acknowledge is possible), I'm coming up with about an 11% increase in area inside a cross-section of a 20c tire on a 23 mm rim compared to a 19 mm rim. I assume that translates directly into an 11% increase in volume. There's some slop in there with regard to rim edge height and how it overlaps the tire bead, but I can't see it changing more than +/- 2 points on the 11%.
That actually seems like a lot of additional air volume to me -- more than I initially expected before I crunched a couple of fast numbers.
OK...take the math one step further and calculate the percent volume of the ENTIRE tire and rim internal volume displaced at the contact patch.
edit: Then, contemplate what an increase in internal air volume, given a fixed tire "span",
means to how a pneumatic tire operates...
http://bikeblather.blogspot.com/