claudio1826 wrote:
What would be the world champions criteria?
WIll there be some qualifying races and then a grand finale? Or do you become world champ by getting points at different races?
If the second one, it is basically who pays more is the champ
IMO, 70.3 Worlds will still be the target for top AGers. I have to say I really enjoyed Lahti experience this year, despite having to stay 1 hour driving away from the location and that my bike is not back yet
And also, longer swim, shorter bike and shorter run. For me, no thanks
My understanding is that the PTO/WT AG world champs will be a one-off race that athletes qualify for via rules set out by their home country governing body. That you didn’t know this shows that PTO have much to do with the marketing of their AG event. It’s early days I guess but they really need to get it right with the Oct announcement they’ve said is coming. If they aren’t able to announce their 2024 pro race series with dates/venues and say race ‘X’ will have the AG world champs alongside then they will have missed a key moment to try to catch AG-ers attention as they start to plan their 2024 seasons.
I’m expecting qualification to work pretty much as it does currently for other WT AG group middle/long distance races. In the case of GB, you submit a race result from a qualifying race of your choice (various criteria for what counts as a valid qualifying race, but think IM 70.3 or other reasonably competitive event). A finishing time within 115% of the AG winner time is required for your application to be considered. British Triathlon then picks up to 20 athletes in each AG (mostly this is in order of the lowest % times vs the winner in their qualifying race, once ‘pre-qualified’ athletes have been picked (those who finished strongly in the same championship event the previous year + the national champion).
I think the criteria for other nations is different from GB. But regardless, I expect PTO/WT will just leave this with the various governing bodies to operate their own criteria. So, it seems like the PTO/WT world champs for AG will be similar to IM 70.3 world champs, just with a different way to qualify (and likely more like 1500-2000 athletes competing vs 6000 in Lahti).
If PTO/WT are smart, they will keep race fees similar to the current WT AG races, which are quite a bit cheaper than IM. I know some good athletes who do WT AG euro/world champs, but not IM world champs due to the very high IM race fees. I don’t disagree with you that currently top AG-ers target IM 70.3, but I also think some miss it due to the high cost. Not sure if PTO/WT can/will keep the costs low enough to attract these athletes.
You may well be right about IM 70.3 world champs, there’s a good deal of history/brand there, Lahti looked great and reports from my team mates were very positive (I was supposed to be there but tested +ve for covid the day I was supposed to travel … very 2021!). I’m just saying the Ibiza experience was strong enough that I think there’s a chance the landscape shifts towards the PTO/WT race, especially if at the pro level the PTO series consistently draws the best athletes vs 70.3 races (some evidence of that already this year).
Time will tell!