ziggie204 wrote:
I noticed they didn't bother to include any of the UCI add-ons that were planned and taped earlier this week, I think they realized it was already hard enough and they even gave them some fresh grass on that up-hill and that off camber after the plunge that I would have really appreciated myself on Friday :)
Did you race?
I think my Friday (Morning) race was the best conditions of the weekend. Slick enough to be a bit technical, but not to the point where sections were unrideable. Although, ripping around during the relay Thursday night was a hoot; so tacky and fast.
We knew Saturday evening that the course would not use the UCI sections and that sections would be widened to give fresh-grass options. The officials were certainly thinking about ways to improve the "rideable" to "slog through the mud" ratio. In my opinion, they really didn't add much to the party as they were not technical enough to make a difference in standings nor long enough to make a difference in lap times. I'm surprised they even existed in the first place as Keegan usually designs more significant pro-only sections. On Sunday they just would have been another section to run.
Sunday was in many ways worse than Saturday because it stopped raining. Most mud on Saturday was very wet and didn't stick much. Many riders were opting not to pit regularly. Bikes were quick to wash. On Sunday the mud was more similar to pudding. Not the peanut butter that we get here in Colorado, but with all the water content bikes were very heavy. Pitting every half-lap was mandatory and the run up the hillside to pit 2 was with very heavy bikes. One issue though was that the pit-lane was significantly slower than the race-lane. We were handing bikes directly to the shoulder to help keep them clean a bit longer and save energy.
This course, especially in the mud, reminded me a lot of the Valkenburg course. Lots of elevation change, lots of running through mud. Some people were grumpy as this course favored a certain type of rider and most races were blow-outs because of that.
As for Katie winning; it was very uncertain prior to the race, but given the conditions there is no one in US Cyclocross with as much experience in those conditions.
Personally I was happy to see JPows in 5th for a course that historically does not favor him. Climbing + Mud is a double dose of kryptonite added on top of being sick, one of the best rides of the day.
In my opinion, best ride of the day status goes to one of our junior female riders whom in her year racing CX was 4th in U23 race at 16 years old (17-18 females race in the greater U23 category with a seperate podium) .
Ironically, the sun came out when we were packing after the Men's elite race on Sunday...
Now I need to watch the streaming video as I have no clue what happened despite being there all week...
I talk a lot - Give it a listen:
http://www.fasttalklabs.com/category/fast-talk I also give Training Advice via
http://www.ForeverEndurance.com The above poster has eschewed traditional employment and is currently undertaking the ill-conceived task of launching his own hardgoods company. Statements are not made on behalf of nor reflective of anything in any manner... unless they're good, then they count.
http://www.AGNCYINNOVATION.com