Runless wrote:
Shit like this is frustrating. He is the American mile record holder. Disappointing? Really? Not everyone's career path peaks perfectly at 28. Let's be happy he moved American miling forward and hope he can excel in whatever he does next.
Yeah, he wasn't a championship runner in the sense of bringing home medals, but that is understandable. It's hard to have that level of energy AND be able to control it perfectly. I think Webb may have shown better range from 400M-10000M than any other US runner. Maybe there has been one or two better, but not sure about that. People think he's a headcase, but he was running at a very high level from about the age of 14-15 until his peak 8-9 years later. To expect him to continue to improve another 6-7 years past that in not reasonable for someone who matured so fast. To be as focused as you have to be at the international level to stay competitive is not possible for most people that long; the brain just gets bored. The "7 year itch" is a reflection of our desire for new stimulus in whatever walk of life.
As for him getting trounced by the fast runners as Monty suggested, that's certainly possible, but I would be at least a little surprised if he trained/raced seriously for a year and that was still happening.
I would have thought he'd be a better cyclist than a runner given his BMI and the fact he has 46.xx 400M speed.
His physiology is very different from Verzbicas, who gets better as the distance gets longer. Webb was obviously best at the 1500, but his next best event was probably the 800, although he didn't race it quite as often and with the same focus. For ITU, I think his physiology is perfect.
If you go back to 2005-2007 before he got fried, that's probably a better indicator of what he could do in triathlon IF he found the fire again. He likes to workout a lot, but has made it clear he doesn't like to run high volume. Triathlon could be really good for him as a competitive outlet and whether or not he wins anything big isn't too important.