shady wrote:
Dan Funk wrote:
tucktri wrote:
arkmann wrote:
Class. He probably held back on the last 5 or 6 miles.
Oh Christ do we need to start a thread for the sanders apologists now? Everyone was talking 2:3# in a full ironman this week. Now he runs 2:44 with no swim and it's because he held back? Right.
Just for shits and giggles del corral last year swam about 55 rode 4:15 and then ran 2:37.
Hate on Canucks!
But congrats on the win. Guy is a beast. Would have loved for the pros to have swam though for him.
X2. The irrational exuberance for this guy is something to behold. But good for him for being fast... so quickly. It's kind of hard to believe.
'
Irrational exuberance'? Well lets see. In the span of ~6 years he goes from drug addict sleeping on a couch all day to one of the top runners in the sport and mixing it up with Olympians with fastest bike/run at 70.3 Worlds .
Then today he solos a 4:12/2:44 in his IM debut!! All this in his second (first?) year as a Pro and the fanboys are being 'irrational'?
Ok then Mr Funk.
.
.
Um... yeah. Did you read what I wrote? "Good for him being fast...
so quickly. It's kind of hard to believe."
It's irrational to think that in such a short of time someone could go from being a drug addict sleeping on a couch all day (your words) to mixing it up with the fastest people in the world. It's irrational. It doesn't make sense. And forgive me, but the past 20 years of endurance sports have taught me to be skeptical of such anomalies. Because to an anomaly...there is almost something
shady going on. (sorry, couldn't help myself).
Look, I'm not trying to derail the Sanders Express here. You can't get in the way of fanboys and their object du jour.
But, unless you're logging in from North Korea, I assume you understand and respect the notion of freedom of expression.
So I urge you to keep expressing your views. And I will express mine. The beauty of a place like the Republic of Slowtwitch... they don't have to agree with one another.