jayski wrote:
turdburgler wrote:
jayski wrote:
It is outrageous to blacklist a race due to the participation of Lance. Whatever you think of his manner or intimidatory tactics he was the best cycling athlete of his generation. Everyone was doing it, he was best. He was a hell of a triathlete before as well so why are people so negative about him but less so about Hutthaler (sp), Weiss, Toni Colom etc who have torn up tri despite being multiple time dopers.
I think it seems like the outrage is very much a North American thing. I lived and went to uni in the USA (coming from across the pond) and when I was there I noticed this. It seemed very strange and even more so, there seemed to be excess vitriol toward Armstrong. I get a lot of it and I do not condone doping at all. I think culturally attitudes are different in Europe though. We have seen drugs in endurance sport for a long long time. Do we want it? No, but Americans in particular really seem to hate their Lance. Lance was an asshole and his peers were not for the most part; that is why I think the vitriol lingers, but he was also a better athlete than his also doped peers. I don't know why people care what some retired athlete does for fun these days.
I agree with pretty much all of that!
A question to my American friends - do you hate Justin Gatlin? As far as I am concerned he is ten times worse than Lance. No contrition, multiple doping violations, no honesty, no apology, blatantly doping when he won in London at the world champs. Lance : hung out to dry. Is Justin treated the same way?
I like Gatlin in the same way I like Vino. It's not that I like them. I like that they are blatant that they will dope until gettting caught, sit out their ban, come back, dope some more, win some more but they are largely up front about what they are doing. They treat doping like triathlon pros treat drafting.....push the grey line and get max benefit and try not to get penalized and then win as much as you can and if you get caught, just take the penalty and go back to playing.
The difference between doping and say drafting is that in doping, you cannot see what cheating is going on behind in the scenes, whereas drafting is in full view. WE as fans are more forgiving of rule bending that goes on right in front of our face. It's called "smart racing". We as fans and fellow athletes detest rule bending and breaking that goes on behind our back, thus we detest doping and that is understandable....Vino, Gatlin and others, they don't think that behind the back cheating is any different than on the playing field stuff. To them it's all one big grouping.
I don't love that they dope. I accept that in THEIR VALUES that is how the game is played and they don't really care what white collar people like you and I think. They are there to earn a living and not please us.
Lance's flaw is that inside the peloton he was fairly open with all his doped peers about what is going on.....just keep it inside the peloton....the moment anyone went outside the Peloton, Lance went balistic on them. Guys like Eddy Merckx, Fignon, Indurain, Delgado, Roche....all doped to the gills with the dope of the day. They played the game exactly like Vino and Gatlin.