bgarrood wrote:
No problem.
The data is recorded to a fit file at 1Hz. To keep things simple this is just offloaded from your Garmin in the usual way. The device itself doesn't store any data.
Here are the channels recorded in the FIT file record data in our CIQ app (includes the "Aerobody" body position sensor data).
Wind yaw angle, in degrees
Wind speed, in kph
Barometric pressure
Air density
Rider power as used by Aerosesnor
Power expended through aerodynamic drag
Power expended through road slope
Power expended through rolling resistance
Head height from aerobody, in cm
Chest height from aerobody, in cm
30 second (or as set in ACS CIQ app) rolling average CdA
Cumulative average CdA over lap
Slope can be backed out from barometric pressure and air density (i.e. change in elevation from one datapoint to the next is just
delta elevation = - airdensity x gravity x change in barometric pressure
negative because as you rise the pressure falls.
You can then get grade by dividing by change in distance.
Hope that answers your question!
So I read the manual on the website and your post above and it occurs to me that your device is sufficiently accurate to use the “real time” estimates of CdA, where these “real time” estimates are the values taken from a 500 to 1000m out and back run.
The Notio would provide real time CdA values, but you really had to do the post-processing in Golden Cheetah to get useable results because the real time estimates could be all over the map. My guess on the differences in the two instruments is the Aerosensor’s measurement of elevation (I think Notio used slope, which made it very sensitive to how level you got the device during the install).
So my question is whether you can or should use Golden Cheetah to refine the estimates if you are using a looping coarse or a velodrome.