RowToTri wrote:
maybe Embrunman with 5000m of climbing over 188km, but I suspect a TT bike is probably still better there.
https://www.embrunman.com/en/long-distance/ If the course goes back down after it goes up, unless it is all very very technical on the descent, the TT bike is going to be faster.
I passed someone who was on a road bike while going down Lefthand Canyon the other day. A 3500 ft descent that averages 4% or so for most of it with the sharper turns recommended at 20mph for cars. I am not a particularly skilled or brave descender and I can do almost the whole thing in TT position without touching the brakes. I stopped to wait for a friend and the road biker caught up and stopped and marveled at my skill to handle a TT bike on the descent. I told him that TT bikes handle a lot better than most people give them credit for and it is actually a much faster bike on lefthand than a road bike. He seemed skeptical.
The bike elevation stated on the Embrunman's website is incorrect. It's around 3500 m. Although I took the safe approach and used my road bike (with clip-ons) when I raced it, there are many parts of the course where the use of a tri bike is justified. The 2023 race took place yesterday and the winner (Arthur Horseau, who made the headlines here after the Lanzarotegate earlier this year) broke the course (and race) record aboard his TT bike, in 5h30 and change.
If you want a 5000 m of elevation bike course in France, you have to go to the Altriman, in the Pyrenees. It's constantly up and down, technical, on average to bad roads, I can't picture myself using a tri bike there and I doubt a pro would use it either. I should ask Sam Laidlow, who is a local to the course.