monty wrote:
But USADA is going to get really hurt here, and now most likely a ton of retroactive medals being taken away and awarded to next in line. And so many times that other single athletes have been popped for what they claimed was inadvertent, and sometimes actually proved so, but were all made public with the positive.. ... Do you mean WADA, and not USADA? I think that this has created a lot of negativity and some of the posts made by the athletes (particularly the GB team members) has been quite spiteful, which speaking for myself, detracts some of the enjoyment and excitement I had for these games. Swimming was on quite a good run since Sun Yang has been out.
I am not sure more 'transparency' is actually always that beneficial. We certainly don't have transparency on TUEs, which are regarded as 'legal doping'. I mean many of the fittest athletes in the world have multiple TUEs (I have heard some athletes having up to 8 or 9).
But a real problem with this is that there is no consistency - we probably assume that cases of contamination involve a provisional suspension and then a process to establish the contamination. However, how many cases don't we hear about it where the national federation sweeps in and does an investigation and then notifies WADA. Cynics may say that Swimming Australia has been quite silent / non-combative in its public statements because it has adopted a similar approach (investigating, then notifying WADA - rather than provisional suspension).