McNulty wrote:
3. Pros who dope now: dumb asses who know better but roll the dice anyway to get a stage or race and get paid more. They just suck, but are mostly inconsequential.
There's another two categories I think. There are pros who exploit the gray areas, e.g. those who used Tramadol when it was legal, or (use)d corticosteroids legal out of competition as training aids. "Legal" but not healthy. As in if I had a kid who was a promising cyclist, I wouldn't want them entering a sport where powerful drugs like that are a regular part of the training regimen. It's not hard to name guys who almost certainly fall into this category.
And then there are just the plain smart dopers. Not the dumb-ass, poor Columbian or Italian conti pros (or Tyler Hamilton) who idiotically light themselves up until they glow at night. But the guys who systemically exploit gaps in anti-doping, and will almost certainly never be caught.