CU427 wrote:
Hmmmm....
So do I HAVE to be a triathlete to earn the benefits that are discussed in this article?
Or can I simply just find an activity: Triathlon, CrossFit, Hiking, Rec Sports etc. that allow me to set goals, maintain a good active lifestyle, at a
that I can sustain for a lifetime I am not disagreeing with what Dan wrote, but it seems almost as if I need to be a triathlete to distance myself from prescription drugs, high blood pressure, etc.
I would be a bit more interesting to see how triathlon compares to other active life ventures and where the percentages lie with regards to whats mentioned in this article. That would be a bit more persuasive rather than comparing against the sedentary public.
Did you actually read the whole article? Because, Dan does touch on those points. Yes, you CAN do something else. The main points are: 1. Do enough, 2. Do it hard enough, 3. Have some variety. There's nothing special about Tri, except that it encourages both #1 and 2, and of course demands #3.
Quote:
Furthermore the timing of this article on back to back weekends with 3 deaths in races. With 2 of those being in the swim, older athletes, yes we can say that there time was near. However, this article fails to bring in the risks of being a triathlete and exposing yourself to situations of higher risk (open water swimming), though with the intent of this article I understand why. But it doesn't dismiss the notion that the benefits of health in this article can be done in activities that reduce your risks of swimming in open water, cycling on open roads with vehicle traffic, etc. Yes every activity has its share of risks, but I would argue that triathlon has more open risk then other sports/activities that can be done by the general masses.
You really need to learn about publication bias. Just because you hear about it more, doesn't mean its happening more. Also, just because there is a short term cluster of events doesn't mean its a long term trend that requires swift and decisive corrective action.
The article address this, as well. It really seems like you didn't read the whole thing, or skimmed it really fast. The death rate in triathlon is somewhere between 1 - 1.5x that of other endurance sports...depending on which stats / study you put the most stake in.
As my Physician likes to say, "Life is dangerous, almost nobody gets out alive." The ODDS are much better that you will live a longer, and have higher quality of life as an athlete (even a "high risk, thrill seeking, death defying" triathlete) than not. But, there aren't any guarantees. BTW, I've decided that I'm going to be in the "defiant" group that DOES get out alive.
PS: people die doing everything...including sitting still on the toilet. But, if
you aren't comfortable with
your risk swimming in open water, then don't.